This movie was NOTHING like the book

I didn't want to say that because I thought I got serious fan vibe off these people (like I would get death threats) but yeah totally agree. The book was appalling.

Stop being precious, what makes a good book doesn't always make a good film

My only complaints are the mis-casting of the Camerlengo and Hassassin. They should never have cast Ewan MacGregor as the Camerlengo because the character is supposed to be Italian, however, since MacGregor is Irish they had to change the Camerlengo's nationality to fit the actor and by doing so his part in the story no longer makes sense. And as for the Hassassin, he was described in the book as a "mountain of a man" so I thought the actor was way to scrawny and also his accent was way off. I didn't mind some of the other changes though, infact I appreciated that they had Langdon save the last preferiti (papal candidate) from drowning in the fountain because unlike in the book, this time there were actually other people present in the square that night, and also the ending where, unlike in the book where they give Langdon the Illuminati crossed keys iron as a lone (and what exactly is he supposed to do with that?!) they finally give him the book he needs from the archives to finish researching the book he was currently writing (well thank you!). They also could have placed the Camerlengo's suicide on the Pope's balcaney like in the book instead of at the entrance to the catacomes and they also should have cast the head of CERN (the old man in the wheel chair) in the movie instead of combining him with Leonardo Vetra. Other than those few annoyances I didn't mind the movie but the book is definitely better.