MovieChat Forums > The Tudors (2007) Discussion > Bizarre casting choices

Bizarre casting choices


Besides the casting of a young man to play Henry VIII into his fifties without age makeup or padding, what's with the choices for the women in this series? Why cast a very attractive woman and have her described as looking "like a horse"? Why have a character (Catherine Howard) who is supposed to be sexually irresistible played by an actress who isn't especially pretty, as actresses go, and is far from sexy (the best thing you can say about her breasts is that she has two of them, side by side)?

And regarding the men, who's that bozo in season 4 who talks like he's holding a cocktail wienie in his mouth and keeps glancing toward the camera? I can't watch him.

reply

Agree. The series perhaps was trying to play against stereotype, but at what cost?

"What is TRUTH?"
I WANT AN ErJen1 SIGNATURE, ALSO.

reply

@OP

There are several examples of what I consider to be poor casting choices, but the biggest one (some pun intended) is Henry. He's supposed to be an imposing figure, yet JRM did not come across that way; he came across as a whiny little biatch. Very distracting.

Love isn't what you say or how you feel, it's what you do. (The Last Kiss)

reply

"And regarding the men, who's that bozo in season 4 who talks like he's holding a cocktail wienie in his mouth and keeps glancing toward the camera? I can't watch him."

I read that, thought for about two seconds, then laughed out loud. Earl of Surrey, no? We called him sausage mouth too. But I did enjoy his depiction.

reply

Well, if you WANT to be historically accurate... for starters, Katharine of Aragon and Henry VIII should both be redheads. Anne Boleyn should not be gorgeous... and her eyes should be brown. ;)

reply

lmao @ talks like he has a cocktail wienie in his mouth.

reply

Jonathan Rhys Meyers should have NEVER been cast as King Henry VIII. Why cast a thin brunette for the role (at least dye his hair - sheesh!) always got to me. Stephen Waddington, who was cast as the Duke of Buckingham, is the splitting image(or maybe even a better looking version) of the real Henry VIII. He should have been given that role, not Jonathan Rhys Meyers! :(

reply

I absolutely loved JRM as Henry. They were doing something different and not the usual fat repulsive pig people think of as Henry or the typical red haired Stephen Waddington or even Damian Lewis in Wolf's Hall. They actually did add red to his hair..he wasn't a ginger, but he was auburn and you could see the red tint in certain episodes. They needed a Henry with sex appeal and sex scenes against someone like Natalie Dormer as Anne.

He was supposed to be at his peak of youth, health, virility, and power as the series starts. They didn't really age up anyone until towards the end. He certainly got Henry's personality. They did something that hadn't been done a million times before and that's why people loved it.

Richard Burton was not a red-headed Henry in "Anne of the Thousand Days" (and was sexy as hell)

Eric Bana was sexy as hell as Henry in "The Other Boleyn Girl" and didn't look a thing like Henry.

The show wasn't a documentary or historically correct. It was a sexed up series based on history. The clothes and jewelry were not authentic to the period.

If you want something further to the truth and you haven't seen it, then try the BBC series from the 1970s "The Six Wives of Henry VIII" with Keith Michell. That is the show that is the closest to history and absolutely brilliant.


I once gave a link to this before, but Amazon has a boxed set of the "BBC's Tudor Collection" which includes the mini-series "Shadow of the Tower" (based on Henry VIII's parents Henry VII and Elizabeth of York)/ The Six Wives of Henry VIII with Keith Michell/and Elizabeth R with Glenda Jackson.
Remember us, for we too have lived, loved and laughed

reply