MovieChat Forums > The Number 23 (2007) Discussion > 23 reasons why you are allowed to hate t...

23 reasons why you are allowed to hate this film


1) If everything adds up to 23, who gives a fXck?
2) What's with the dog?
3) Jim Carrey shouldn't do sex scenes.
4) His child was unrealistically good at math.
5) It left the misconception that an insane asylums are good places to pick up dates.
6) The wife was weird.
7) The kid had a bad hair cut, it was 2007 not '87.
8) Jim Carrey didn't talk through his ass.
9) Since when should movies teach lessons about guilt?
10) Wait there isn't 23 reasons, I guess that proves the movis wrong.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

haha, funny & true...

reply

This movie was fantastic 9/10

reply

Reasons movietrashers is a retard

1) He's a fetal alcohol baby

reply

2) We wasted 2 precious hours of our vacation in Rome watching this film...and now are wasting another 15 minutes of our vacation in Cali writing come-back comments on IMDB

reply

1 reason why you would waste 2 hours watching ANY movie while you're on a vacation in Rome:

You're dumb.

Dude, you're in ROME!! WHY ARE YOU WATCHING A MOVIE! lol

reply

Don't feel bad. The cops make won't let me stay in one town long either.

reply

The better question is why you would bother watching any two hour movie in Rome?

reply

I'm sorry for those who enjoyed this movie but, ugh...



Jim Carey playing something the least bit scary.. no.



And all the 23 connections got extremely painful to listen to after awhile.. they beat that point relentlessly into the ground...


OK acting in general, but no.

reply

hahaha, people actually like this movie, ahahaha


reply

I know! People actually have different opinions than you? Your opinions aren't fact?

Wait, that's not shocking at all, actually.

reply

I thought it was pretty good, wouldn't watch it more than 2 times, but it definitely wasn't a waste of time.

I am the phantom... My real name is Jerrryyyyy.

reply

Although the movie wasn't that great, your reasons are a bit retarded.

On a different note, I did think Jim Carrey did a good job with the serious role.

reply