MovieChat Forums > The Tree of Life (2011) Discussion > Whether you loved it or hate it, please ...

Whether you loved it or hate it, please explain why.


I'm definitely full of conflicting feelings regarding this film and I came to imdb seeking exposure to other peoples' thought processes. Unfortunately, within most threads I've looked at all I've found is comments like these:

"This is a unique and beautiful masterpiece and one of the best films ever made."

or....

"Worst. Film. Ever.
End of story."


People rarely actually explain why they liked or disliked the movie. These are the most specific comments I have found on either side, and it's comments like these that I want to request in this thread:


"The film transcends categorization because it attempts to encompass the grandeur of not only human life, but of ALL life" (still pretty vague but honestly the most specific comment I found on the positive side).

or...

"I see little worth in a film with no structure, no plot and no coherence. I see little skill in filming a 20 minute sequence about the start of the world narrated by whispered nonsense and injecting it into a random part of the film. The only good thing was some nice visuals, but that doesn't make it unique."



What these people have done is provided reasons for their opinions. I challenge everyone in this thread to post your opinion of this film, and clearly EXPLAIN why you feel that way. I'm dying to actually understand everyone's opinions and thought processes. This is not a place to debate whether this was a good or bad film or to convince others the way they think is wrong, this is a place to express YOUR OWN opinion and then clearly explain why you feel that way. No cop-outs aloud.


I'm curious how many people are actually capable of defending any of their positions on this film.

reply

Wow, this film divides opinion like no other! We watched this with our (adult) daughter last night and the result was one early bail out and two who stuck with it and got something out of the film. If the pre-'evolution' scenes had continued much longer I'd have bailed out too but during the wonderful 'evolution' scenes I settled down with genuine intrigue and then, for me, the true story started with a wonderful dreaminess and cinematic style before a short but stunning finale that allows the viewer to interpret the total film and draw their own conclusions. I've seen better films but not many that have really made me think about what I've just seen.

reply

One of the worst movies I've watched, frankly.

This movie is what you get when switching channels furiously between interstellar imagery (ripped off from the Hubble telescope), a family soap drama, BBC World imagery (ripped off again from their source), more family drama on the Salt Flats?

When I saw all the images I recognized from BBC Yellowstone and BBC Planet Earth, I was like OMG. I almost switched off my TV during the 1st and 2nd act, but the 3rd act did intrigue me. However, after the family was shown moving house, the 4th act was a messy disaster again.

I can understand why some people would love this movie, I'm guessing the religious kind who rarely watches BBC Planet Earth, National Geographic or have no interest in interstellar imagery.

Unfortunately, I'm the exact opposite, so half the imagery in the film I've seen before, (as a ripoff no less). And the religious themes are pretty heavy-handed. The family drama? Pitt was great in his role, the others did a decent job, but Sean Penn was just moping aimlessly around most of the time like waiting to knock off. His parts were so dull.

And this film could have easily been 1 HOUR SHORTER. There were a lot of repetitive takes: i.e. less shots of nebulas and exploding volcanos, plus near the end there is a dream sequence where the mother lets her son out of the house to a 'desert'. There was at least 3 takes of that scene. Grrr...

reply

I didn't like it simply because I found it boring. I can understand why it got some acclaim but, seriously, I was struggling to keep awake for it.

reply

It's been a while since I saw this film, but what made me dislike it is it makes little to no effort in explaining itself to its audience. It gives 20% then lets the audience draw their own conclusions for whatever the 80% means. The director then takes credit for the creativity of the audience.

Speaking of drawing conclusions, the only thing I "got" from my first viewing (like a lot of people) is it tries to contrast a tiny speck of humanity and what it means to be human against the vast, mysterious, and ever-evolving universe. While that's a workable premise, I felt the director wasted too much time on something that could be explained succinctly. Once you got the idea, you could pretty much just leave the theater and experience the world yourself.

reply

Well it's funny you say that for this director in particular. Terrence Malick is known for taking basically no credit other then putting his name on it. He never goes to award shows and doesn't do any interviews.

It's just the nature of life. It never explains itself no matter how hard we try for it to do so. There is nothing to "get". It just is. All we can do is wonder what it all means, which is exactly what this movie wants to achieve.

The movie is very personal to the director, so asking for an explanation is the same as me asking you to "explain" your life story.

reply

If you enjoyed this film, you would probably like Love (2011). They are quite similar that I dislike both equally. Flashbacks, reality, fiction, space and finally viewer confusion. Time sink.

reply

FWIW.. I connected with some parts of the film at a very intimate emotional level.

I have kids. If you dont have little kids yes, maybe you won't understand this.

There are scenes in the beginning of the film where the Pitt and Christinsin characters are new parents. The way it was filmed totally captured the feeling of that experence for me.

The feeling of bringing a first child into the world is fascinating and overwhelming. Its indescribable. To feeling to witness a new child that is yours, that has your genes, that has slight discernable traces of your features and your traits be brought forward in front of you into the world. The feeling that overcomes you as a new parent is you never want to leave this child ever -- and you dread every time you get reminded of the truth that you will one day have to die and you will have to leave them and never see them again and that is just the way life is.

There is also the scene where the new born child is growing up and shots of the feet and curtains. Totally captured the feeling of bringing up a new child in the world and the feeling of loss when you think back and ask yourself, "where did the time fly and go and what was i doing? I swear they were a new born just yesterday and they could barely stand up.. why did I not spend more time with them when they were growing up at that age -- I will never be given a chance to re-live that ever again" and the regrets that go through your mind every ones in a blue moon.

Stuff like that.

it hits right at the heart strings.



"Oh, Mama, can this really be the end, to be stuck inside of mobile
with the memphis blues again"

reply

This is my favorite movie.

I respond strongly to films with religious/spiritual themes (i.e. The Seventh Seal, The Passion of Joan of Arc, Balthazar) and that is certainly one reason I love this film. Never has a movie made me want to be a better person like this one.

The communicative possibilities of film fascinate me. Few filmmakers attempt to convey an idea or a story primarily through images, but that is precisely what Malick is doing here. The images have great meaning, such as the dinosaur who chooses not to eat that other dinosaur, which I take to be the first act of grace on our planet. Sure the images are beautiful, but they serve a purpose, which may be lost on people who are too precipices with the film's visual beauty.

Many claim this film is 'too personal' and cannot be appreciated by the general public, but I felt in the scenes of Jack as a child that I was watching myself grow up. I felt the wonder of childhood and the loss of that innocence again, which I found to be apowerful and impactful experience.

The film is different. It's like Malick was filming poetry where everyone else was filming prose. A lot of people don't like Frost, Cummings, or Eliot, but that doesn't mean they weren't masters of their craft. Watching this film is like reading great poetry; it is evocative and often difficult, but beautiful if you are open to it.

Also shout out to the soundtrack, which I think is beyond perfect.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]