MovieChat Forums > El orfanato (2008) Discussion > Am I that desensitized?

Am I that desensitized?


Everyone seems to love this movie. It is at this moment a 7.6. This was the least scary movie I have seen in a while with the exception of campy horror.

I understand the horror was not the point of the film, but don't put it in a horror setting if you aren't going to utilize it. It was awesome for a Lifetime movie. Beyond that I was very bored. So this begs the question do you all love it because it was something different, or is it because you genuinely found it scary and I am just numb to these films now.

Tough times don't last. Tough people do.

reply

Everyone seems to love this movie. It is at this moment a 7.6. This was the least scary movie I have seen in a while with the exception of campy horror.


You're confused. People don't love this film because it's scary, but because it's a brilliant piece of film making.

Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!

reply

Not necessarily. Don't base sensitivity on one movie.

I didn't find the movie scary. A few scenes had me jump. My friends found it terrifying. They're easily frightened in general.

I just found this movie to be artfully crafted and brilliantly written. It's scary in a different way. I'd say haunting or chilling is the right word. It's a haunting thought that a) you can unknowingly and unintentionally harm or even kill someone you love b) you can become so absorbed in the unknown that reality doesn't mean much to you anymore.

reply

I don't watch movies in order to be scared because I don't especially like to be scared. But I watch certain movies despite the fact that they will try to scare me. That said I've watched a number of scary mystery thrillers and series because I love the mystery aspect and the atmosphere (Sixth Senth, The Gift, What Lies Beneath, The Village, Sleepy Hollow...). Sometimes I even watched stupid horror movies because of certain actors (Nightmare on Elm Street, House of Wax). I don't believe those two movies scared me at all. So even though I don't understand why some people watch movies in order to be scared I'm not THAT squeamish.

I was certainly scared very much by "The orphanage". The film even managed to make me scream once - when she was in the cupboard with the secret door and suddenly a ghostly arm appeared at the door and closed it. I don't know if a movie has ever made me scream before this one... They most certainly used the horror setting very well in my opinion.
Cheep scrares like the mangled face or the bloody fingernail didn't much bother me but the times when the screen went black for long long seconds alone made me more than nervous. I wouldn't have managed to watch 10 minutes of this film alone and was very glad that I had company... Right now I would call this the most scary movie I've ever watched.

I guess it's different for everyone.

reply

I thought it was scary at several points, and the acting was very good (apart from the actor who played the husband, who looked like he'd rather be elsewhere). But the beginning of the film could have been a lot better to build more sympathy for the characters, because the kid just came across as bratty and the mother came across as slightly cold.

Overall, it wasn't as good as Orphan (2009), which had a completely different story but has similarities and was much more engaging and satisfying to watch.

And I think the method of using a horror/supernatural setting for a movie which is more about drama was done better in Take Shelter (2011).

'pay the man'

reply

Its "Introductory Horror", Hollywood (yes, I know this movie wasn't done in Hollywood, but stay with me on this) has all kinds of "introductory" movies. Like Number 23 is a "introductory psychological thriller", The Others and The Orphanage are introductory horror movies. Only the Oprhanage is not done in hollywood

They are great for people to start in the genre and dig deeper, they are great movies BUT they are botherline "non-genre". And I feel that ultimately, these kinds of movies leave a lot of "holes" open in their plots. It's not a "plot hole" In the sense that it is something that clearly contradicts, but something that if you really try to think about it, you won't be able to create a "whole story" that feels satisfying.

There are many moments in the movie that only work in the context of "what the viewer" knows at this or that moment; if you think about it after watching the whole movie, probably it won't fit that well.

reply

The Others and The Orphanage are introductory horror movies.


I like how I could recommend it to friends, or my parents, due to not a lot of the gratuitous gore. I could name a only a few "horror" movies I'd ever re-watch, let alone recommend. The movie's more of a creepy murder mystery (with a mother who seems to be losing her mind) than a full-on modern gore-fest. And the gross parts are tacked-on to purchase the "R" rating. I also like it because it seriously reminds me of The Changeling, one of my favorites.

It does seem to have "holes", even the opening credits have nothing to do with the story. Maybe there was a spontaneous producer or director... "Hey let's throw this in!" or "Let's throw that out!"... "Don't worry, the film's still good..."


-----------------
Incredibly Handsome Master Of All Villainy

reply

the opening credits have nothing to do with the story
I saw the credits as tying in the movie two ways. 1) In the scene where Laura realizes there's a hidden door she first starts tearing at and peeling off the wallpaper. 2) This is the sort of movie where if you watch it two or more times the layers peel off and you understand more of the story/plot.

reply

I absolutely agree with the OP. Very disappointing, not scary at all, not thrilling, not interesting overall. A boring experience.

And for those who ask:
THE RING is a scary movie, THE OTHERS is a scary movie, The Orphanage is NOT!

Moreover, the story reminded me of a french movie, Saint Ange (2004), which IMHO is far better.

P.S. It was advertised as a horror movie in my country.

reply

Your opinion on what's scary isn't factual though. It's different for everyone.



I'm the grim reaper, lardass, and you're my next customer.

reply

I thought the film was good but quite slow

reply

THis is kind of only loosely a horror movie, it was more of a phycological drama, which if you was watching while thinking it's gonna be a scary horror movie might not be what ya looking for! I quite liked it and found it eerie and a cool plot line but the first time i watched it was with mates when we was drinking and expecting a scary movie and i didn't appreciate it or watch it properly. glad i watched it again!

reply

[deleted]