MovieChat Forums > Moartea domnului Lazarescu (2005) Discussion > THIS MOVIE IS NOT A COMEDY!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...

THIS MOVIE IS NOT A COMEDY!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!


Why is this movie in the top 50 comedy movies on IMDB? Like I said in the title this movie is not a comedy it is a social satire or a tragedy but it sure isn't a comedy

reply

This film is not a comedy nor a satyre...it reflects the pure truth about romanian hospitals and health service, and I don't think any romanian could look at this film and see a comedy (even a dark one)

reply

Well it's funny at some points.. When the doctor sais that "We can't have a good conversation here", while the poor pacient was incoherent.. Or the doctor asking for a croissant after refusing to operate the pacient.. Or the light automatically switching off on the stairs while talking to the neighbour... It's loaded with humourous situations... especially during the first hour...

The medical system in Romania is actually even worse that depicted in the movie.. In the movie the doctor refuses bribe which is very rare..The Romanian doctors actually do accept bribe in reality..

reply

Most probably, the producers chose to market The Death of Mr Lazarescu as a comedy, also. They wanted to make money outta man's tragedy. :P For those of you who don't deem the authors of 'The Death...'capable of doing so, please double check the alternate poster of the movie (not the one shown at Cannes, with the two cats on a bed, but the one featuring the medical staff laughing about old fart Lazarescu, which I saw at TIFF). The Death of Mr Lazarescu is a sad, crude, raw, dark, realistic whatever film about humans, however, it doesn't lack in the humor factor. There are quite a few lines and scenes adding to that. The bulb that goes on and off, the portrayal of some characters, some moronic lines, even the neighbors pissed about the cats pissing all over the old man's place, even the irony the authors put in the old man's name, etc.

Although not being even remotely as good as Kaurismaki's or Solondz's, Puiu's humor it's struggling its way somewhere in there.

reply

Absolutely agree. Must be the most ridiculus use of the word "comedy" I've ever seen

reply

The review quotes on the DVD box called it a black comedy. This is the worst misrepresentation of a movie I've ever seen. Going by the box I was expecting something along the lines of Hitchcock's The Trouble With Harry. Black humour around the death of an individual. What I got was a frustrating boring ordeal of a movie that I had to switch off after 90 minutes.

reply

I agree.

Perhaps in its native country more of the dialogue comes through in a comedic sense, but the American version I saw had few comedic moments. Sure the front of the DVD box calls it a black comedy, but the back proudly proclaims it is the most acclaimed comedy of the year. Just comedy.

Now, I thought it was a great movie. Deeply moving. Thought provoking. But the sustained frustration I felt made it more of a tragedy, not a comedy. A tragedy in the oldest sense of the word: I know the ending (from the title) yet cannot believe that we'll be unable to avoid it.

reply

I just saw it on rented DVD a few hours ago. The DVD box advertises that it's a comedy and makes a big deal about it. I think some people are grasping at straws here, trying to justify what appears like a clerical error (advertising that it's a comedy when it obviously isn't).

Many horror, drama, scifi/fantasy and love movies often have light-hearted moments, and sometimes even outright laugh-out-loud comedic bits. But even they aren't classified as comedies. Even as far as comedic bits in a non-comedy, this movie has sparingly few, and they are hardly "laugh-out-loud" moments.

It seems the some folks are trying desparately to justify this labeling error, but claiming that such things like the hall light that kept going off by itself, or a sarcastic comment that somebody made could justify the comedy label.

If the move was NOT labeled a comedy, do you think anybody would be advocating that it ought to be?

I liked this movie VERY much by the way. But during a lot of it I was really wondering when the funny would start. I just randomly picked the movie off the shelf based on the cover proclaiming it to be some bigdeal comedy that won awards and that lots of critics praised. I'm half Hungarian so such culture is of interest to me somewhat, which is also partially why I picked it.

f-erenc

reply

I also was waiting for the laughs. I played some of the director's interview on the US DVD and he himself says that it's not a comedy.

reply

Just finished watching it for the first time and this was my first thought. It is no comedy.

reply

If you've read and enjoyed Joseph Heller's book, "Catch 22", you'll probably find this film funny. I think that there are many similarities between the dialogue and the way it is used in this film and in Heller's book. In other words, crazed, absurd and hilarious. For me this film is a tragi-comedy. The 'comedy' part being in the dialogue and small details of the moment (like some of the mobile phone conversations, or the absurdity of flirting in front of cancer patients), the 'tragi' part being that this crap no doubt really happens to people in the hands of state-run enterprises, like hospitals in Romania, the UK or wherever every day. A great tragi-comedy for our time, in my eyes.

reply

I think that there is some irony in their use of the word "comedy" in advertising the movie, knowing very well what we do expect from the word "comedy".

However, it is as much a comedy as a "comedy of errors" is.

Let's not forget also the references to Dante's "Divina Commedia" : Lazarescu's middle name is Dante and there are two characters (unseen) named Virgil.

reply

Yes of course, Dante going into hell, and Lazarescu is a reference to the resurrection of Laser in case anyone missed that (!) I don't know my Virgil well but I imagine it also has to with traveling, returning to your home i.e. the Aeneid/Oddysey.

It is not a comedy. But it has some very dry and offputting stuff that can be classified as humour yes, which can be conceived as just laughing through tears at the absurdity of life and humanity e.g. as some of the other posters said like Beckett or Bergman. It also reminded me a lot of Fassbinder, also not someone generally associated with humor, but I recall the scene in Fear Eats the Soul where after she marries the black Moroccan guy she wants to go to celebrate at the restaurant where Hitler used to have lunch and neither of them are fazed when they do.

I found it mildly humorous how the neighbour's wife kept insisting he try her moussaka even while the guy was blowing chunks.

Outstanding film overall.

reply

>I don't know my Virgil
One of Dante's characters is named Virgil.

reply

You can watch this filme as you want, you can't tell people how to react: for me, this was a tragic comedy, or a day a day life comedy and tragedy, and I laughed a lot - but always a laugh while shaking my head. You should smile, that's a refugee to escape from everyday's tragedies.

reply

Thank you andre giao, it is definitely a comedy. It's what comedy should really be - totally confrontational about the profound absurdity of human existance. That's what Becket's about, Swift, Chaucer, Chekhov, any decent satire. We're so used now to toothless comedy, or if it is black then it's cruel and cynical. Real comedy stares into the abyss and realises that the only honest reaction is helpless laughter, the laughter of release. We're all so bloody po-faced when it comes to illness and death, which is exactly why this underworld of awful hospital environments is so powerful: humanity so scared of dealing with its own mortality that it hides it away and leaves jaded proffesionals to do the dirty work behind closed doors. I was KNOCKED OUT by this movie. I laughed becuase it was so bloody accurate, so truthful about human beings and how they REALLY behave in the face of death and decay. If you want a prettified, sentimental vision of death and dying, watch another saccharine Hollywood movie where some well made-up star dies beautifully surrounded by beautiful, heroic, compassionate doctors.
The incredible power of this movie is how the wreck that Lazarescu starts out as, somehow ends up exuding a kind of tragic grandeur, even as he becomes more and more incoherant and absurd.

I'm not Romanian, but I've definitely been in hospitals like this - they're ALL like this to some extent. They look and smell like toilets because that's what we insist on them being - places we dump human waste. The people that work in them ARE heroic, but, like the nurse here, their heroism is sometimes deeply buried in great swathes of exhaustion and despair and self-preservation.

I won't go on and on, because I'm aware that the general reaction to this movie is obviously bothering me!
Look up the meaning of the word 'absurd', it's one of the most profound words in the English language.

Rant over.

reply

Is George Carlin a Comedian?

reply

Is Bucharest a city?
Is this a trick question?

reply

the poster is sarcastic. nobody said this is a comedy. the quotes on the poster are fake.

reply

[deleted]