MovieChat Forums > 10,000 BC (2008) Discussion > This movie is garbage.

This movie is garbage.


The writing is terrible, the acting is terrible, the story is terrible. The characters have fake accents and speak obtusely for no particular reason. Like why does anyone refer to the mammoths as "four-legged demons" when they already have a word for them? Everyone has perfect teeth and perfect dreads or shaved heads. The lazy makeup looks like someone smeared a bit of coal on the actors' faces.

I don't understand why anyone defends this movie. Even if you pretend that it's pure fantasy, it's just so obviously bad. I'm intensely aware that I'm watching bad actors speaking bad lines with bad accents. I'm completely unable to suspend my disbelief. I don't know anything at all about the time period, but I know that it looked nothing like this. It's not even bad in an entertaining way, it's just dumb.

reply

Absolutely agreed 100%

reply

I mean its not a 10 but for a simple action fantasy its not that bad.

reply

Historical inaccuracies aside, I love this film for the time period. I have a thing about Mammoths, and the Saber-Tooth cat was really cool. On that end, I take into account that this is a movie and not a documentary.

As far as the people and the acting...Well, I'm the camp of "it's so bad it's good." This is 10,000 year old cheese on a cracker, as one critic put it. It's just fun, and doesn't need to be any more than that.



Hollywood is a place where they'll pay you $50,000 for a kiss and 50 cents for your soul.

reply

*characters have fake accents*
As opposed to actual mesolithic accents?

*speak obtusely for no particular reason*
They speak closely to natives living in a hunter gatherer society, how should they speak?

*Like why does anyone refer to the mammoths as "four-legged demons" when they already have a word for them?*
The four legged demons are the horses/horsemen not the mammoths.
Jesus.

*I don't know anything at all about the time period, but I know that it looked nothing like this*
How dumb are you

reply

If you didn't like this movie, fine.
No one will force you to watch it ever again, so I guess that you managed to move along with your life.
This was only supposed to be a cheesy fantasy adventure.
So it was never meant to be a highbrow Oscar bait.
But if that was what you wanted, then I can see how you became disappointed by "10 000 BC".
I liked it well enough though for what it was back when I saw it.
Because I could just relax and go along with the ride.
The hate for this movie reminds me of how many people feel about Michael Jackson's "Moonwalker".
It was only a silly thing for kids, that MJ did to amuse himself and his youngest fans.
But people act as if they expected it to be some flawless Oscar-sweeping masterpiece for adults.
And I feel that "10 000 BC" has gotten a similar undeserved backlash.
Someone decided to make a cheesy fantasy movie about pre-historical hunter-gatherers just for the fun of it.
And nobody had promised anybody that they were making a documentary.
It is not even meant to be a "serious" movie, that will make much sense from a historical point of view.
But it seems like some people just can't accept that some movies are just supposed to be silly entertainment.

reply


The writing is terrible, the acting is terrible, the story is terrible. The characters have fake accents and speak obtusely for no particular reason. Like why does anyone refer to the mammoths as "four-legged demons" when they already have a word for them? Everyone has perfect teeth and perfect dreads or shaved heads. The lazy makeup looks like someone smeared a bit of coal on the actors' faces.

I don't understand why anyone defends this movie. Even if you pretend that it's pure fantasy, it's just so obviously bad. I'm intensely aware that I'm watching bad actors speaking bad lines with bad accents. I'm completely unable to suspend my disbelief. I don't know anything at all about the time period, but I know that it looked nothing like this. It's not even bad in an entertaining way, it's just dumb.
Are you saying that it isn't 'pure fantasy'? Got news for you: it is.

As to your main point; I'll grant that it wasn't the best film I've ever seen, but it is also far from the worst.

reply

Not sure if you realise this, but he wrote that long ago on IMDB, so there's a fat chance that he will ever notice this!
The movie wasn't that good anyway, a typical Hollywood over-exaggerated story. With absurdly huge mammoths and sabre tooth cats 3 x as large as they were. Oversize woolly mammoths working in the Egyptian desert(!). It doesn't make any sense at all. This is the kind of story a little kid will come up with after having read about mammoths, sabre tooth cats and terror birds as well as some conspiracy theories about ancient Egypt and Atlantis. Just put it all in the same mix and stir. Just ridiculously stupid in every way. At least they didn't include dinosaurs, but they could as well have done that. This movie doesn't have the cheese factor of something like One Million Years B.C., but it is THAT kind of movie.

Still, I do own that movie on DVD, I have to admit.

reply

Yes, I do realize the age of the OP. I was just putting my comments in.

Would it surprise you to know that I am in basic agreement with both you and the OP on the movie? Quality-wise, I have seen much better films.

But, like I say, I have also seen much worse.

Now, I have hated some very popular films and loved some that many others hated. It is opinion; that's all it is.

You take care and thanks for responding.

reply

Yeah it's pretty bad. I'm not even talking about the historical accuracy;anyone going into a Roland Emmerich movie expecting that is an idiot.

It's just badly written and directed. ONE MILLION YEARS B.C. has almost 4 decades of age on this movie but was far more entertaining.

reply

I believe that you have to go into this movie without expecting anything more than a bit of cheesy fantasy.
That is probably the only way to be able to enjoy it.

reply