The leading female character is a made to look like a plain Jane. But also a plays a b***h. The leading male character is kinda like a snot nosed, weak minded loser. They don't necessarily have to be good looking, but I would like to follow someone that has some control of the situation. Give me one or the other. Why would I want to spend 90 minutes following these unlikable characters when they probably can't even save them selves as they are being stepped on by the people they are trying to save?
The little bit of saving grace is that at least the gore level is up to par with the other movies.
Well you are entilted to your own opinion, but I actually thougth that the cast where the most likable. (FD's where too straight forward, and FD2s where the 2nd most likable even though it was a better film) I actually thought it was good how the characters where so realistically handled.
And calling them "ugly" is a bit harsh as it is aimed at the actors, not the characters themselves.
"Well you are entilted to your own opinion, but I actually thougth that the cast where the most likable. (FD's where too straight forward, and FD2s where the 2nd most likable even though it was a better film) I actually thought it was good how the characters where so realistically handled.
Did...did you see the same movies I did? By straight forward, do you mean one dimensional? Because the characters in this are pure stereotype and are so over the top that no one can take them seriously. And the fact that it took FIVE unlikely freak accidents of five people all related too each other to convince anyone that Wendy and Kevin were telling the truth is not realistic at all.
I found them to be anti-stereotypes myself (i.e characters who start of seaming like their going to be a stereotype, but then distancing themselves from it) and I took them seriously, because I have seen far worst acting, (if that's what you mean by them being "over the top).
I do agree to some extent about the characters not realizing that Wendy was right, but in the films defence she had no direct back up for it - how can you directly prove that Death is "alive" (in a sense) and making sure that those who should be dead die, without sounding like a complete mental patient? In FD Alex found himself in trouble with the police on a few occasions, in FD2 it wasn't an issue because Clear backed up the story and one of the survivors was a cop. Had Wendy pressed the issue, she probably would have either been seen as mad, or as if she somehow engineered the deaths her self (unlikely, but the filmm could have found away) To be honest the way this film jumped from deaath to death with any direct "feed back" from anyone other than the main cast (and one character when another died) was one of the few things I felt this film got wrong.
Anyway, like I said, people are entitled to their own opinion ,and this is mine.
I respect your opinion, but the characters were clearly stereotypes. It just goes beyond opinion into fact. The tanning girls were a couple of bimbos, Frankie was a perv with a video camera, Lewis was an arrogant jock + token black guy, Ian and Erin were cynical goths. These are all lame stereotypes. What I meant by OTT is that they are also exaggerated to the point of campiness. For example, Lewis is "the arrogant jock" so he must lift weights while saying things like "I always win, Death is afraid of me" (who says that??). Since he is also black, he also has to say "Dat's what I'm talkin bout".
Anyone with common sense would be able to piece together that something was going on. Four people that the characters all know have died in ridiculous ways in just a couple of days in the order they would have died if they all stayed on a roller coaster that ended up crashing which one of them predicted would happen which is the exact same scenario that happened a few years earlier only with a plane, complete with pictures that clearly foreshadow the previous deaths. The people still questioning it after Frankie's death were retarded.
You're exactly right about the characters - stereotypical, and paper-thin, no depth to them at all. But what's even worse, most of the deaths were either predictable or just not that horrific, even the first premonition. The Token Black Guy's death was cleverly done, and the final scenes in the subway had all the horror and intensity that was missing from the rest of the movie.
When there is no more room in Hell, The Devil will reapply to the Zoning Commission.
Carrie was using Kevin for sex, didn't care about him at all, and knew about the proposal when she was going to dump him. The Ashes used a tragedy as an excuse to go tanning Frankie tried to score at a funeral, along with being a complete perv Lewis complained about how boing a funeral was and acted like a complete douche all film Ian told Wendy to kill herself while Erin laughed/grinned (I like them... But they're NOT likeable/particularly sympathetic) Julie just acted like a raging bitch all film until the subway, when she was suddenly not a bitch. Even her "likeable" scene with Wendy in Wendy' bedroom started with Julie being a bitch.
Wendy was likeable. Kevin was likeable. Jason was likeable. And umm.... I guess Perry wasn't unlikeable
I think the two leads in 3 are better than the leads in 2, but the rest of 2's cast is better. The original is my fsvorite overall cast. I still haven't seen 4.
They went for the sterotypical high school characters. Wendy is suppost to be a control freak. Carrie is suppost to be a bitch. Ashley and Ashlyn are suppost to be the dumb preps. Lewis is suppost to be the hardass jock. Ian and Erin are suppost to be the loner goths. Frankie is suppost to be a pervert.
These characters beat TFD any day.
Italy's shaped like a boot for a reason...so they can stick it up your ass. - Don Vito
You know, you bring up a point there (and it's quite ironic of it all coming from a goth). These characters weren't even working together as much as the ones from part two with ANY effort whatsoever. Its like they were aiming for having lame excuses to let everybody die so fast and not have a chance to help in time. What a shame...
I'd rather cast these bunch of loonies than the one from The Final...Which was MUCH worse!
"I call myself future names for a reason; no one in the world is like me." - Nicholas Harmon
I don't think any cast is as bad as the cast in the fourth one. When your character names consist of the MILF or the Racist, that is all lazy writing. It's like the 4th movie took everything people hated about the 3rd film and made it more cartoonish than it already was.
Don't any of you people realise the underlying comedy of it all? Seriously? Maybe since it was based around high school and high school kids, they went after the stereo types to lighten up the mood a bit.. If you look at it, FD3 has held up amongst the others in intensity and makes you hold your breathe at points. And it is amazingly gory :p I also find that this FD had the best, most creative deaths.. the Tanning Beds? Nails? Drive through? Amazing. I think you guys are just taking it to seriously lmao. I bet you still don't think this after FD 4. Oh god, now that movie was a mess.
I thought this was a typical attractive cast. Gina Holden has looked better in other roles, and I thought she looked like Kimberly from the last one in this.
The actresses that play the tanning bed girls are much prettier in real life too, without those awful bangs and fake looking tan.