The animation makes it impossible to watch. Either do an actual animation or do live action. But stop with this sloppy overlay format.
shareI disagree, I think it's brilliant and perfectly captures the drug-induced storyline...
shareIt would've been way stronger had they only used it during the drug scenes. I think the only reason it was used was because Linklater needed a way to make the morph suits look convincing, and so he could make Austin look like LA.
shareruins a possibly good movie.
proof?
- this did REALLY poorly
- no one else is doing this, or even bothering to try
- seems more like an "ART" film... you know, not a good enough story so they have to shroud it in something for misdirection? Don't get me wrong, I LIKE the story, but probably not eveyone got what it did storywise.
I GET they wanted it to put you in the feels of a drug tripper.... personally, i think that failed. just looks like really bad cartooning. much better fx could have given you a drugged up feeling
Whatever. I'm watching it again because I liked the story. I'll pretend it is a piece of shit "indie" film and cut it some slack for the garbage visual.
Agreed with all points but won’t watch it again.
sharei watched it. skipped forward a few times.... too much banal talking about nothing to seem human, evading the plot. I recalled I liked the ending, but now it lacked ALL impact. it could have been a 30 minute show and would have been more entertaining. the rotoscoping was still pointless
shareno one else is doing this
Ha! Who'd WANT it? kinda pointless and too niche. weird flex, fb films
share[deleted]
I think they called it Rotoscope.
I didn't like it either.
I wish I had not seen it.
Reading the book was good enough.