Is interesting the question. Both dealings are illegal and both products kills but I would say drug dealing is worse because drugs serve no purpose whereas guns serve a purpose: to defend and/or kill!
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" ALBERT EINSTEIN
Well, you can kill me in a few seconds with a gun, but you cannot kill me with marijuana. You can't even kill me with "hard" drugs unless I'm stupid enough to choose to start abusing them myself, which I'm not. (Do you know many really smart people who started doing crack, meth or heroin? Me neither.)
I have seen enough to know I have seen too much. -- ALOTOshare
"Do you know many really smart people who started doing crack, meth or heroin? Me neither"
okay buddy, go on believing that.
Sh*t is as sh*t does
It isn't a matter of belief. I asked if you knew (and I meant personally, not whether you knew of someone, such as the miscreant celebrities we all hear about) any really smart people who had started doing the more dangerous drugs. I did know one guy about 30 years ago, who was no genius but not a complete idiot, who snorted more coke than he should have. He soon realized it and cleaned himself up. But no, none of the really smart folks I've known ever were dumb enough to get into the more hazardous chemicals.
I have seen enough to know I have seen too much. -- ALOTOshare
Hard to say as both industries are heavily interlinked. Organised criminals tend to have their fingers in many pies. Whichever is the lesser evil, it's still supporting the other!
I'm going to go for drug dealing as war would still take place without arms dealers, people would just use sticks and stones. But there would be far fewer junkies if it wasn't for the drugs trade.
=================================
The Space Shuttle Discovery, Kenny Loggins style: http://youtu.be/3krnu1p58d0
none is evil in essence, it depends on circumstances, and they shouldn't be illegal, but they could be unethical sometimes, you are brainwashed. the only reason why the evil governments of the world make them illegal is to make the prices high and make more prophet for their own pockets. use your imagination!
share"Whereas guns serve a purpose: to defend and/or kill".
Indeed - killing is the only purpose guns exist. So it`s not exactly a tough task to figure out their presence in the world is quite a bit less desireable.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
drug dealing is worse because drugs serve no purpose whereas guns serve a purpose
drugs serve no purpose
Definitely arms dealing! No one forces someone to take drugs, they do it voluntarily; if it's not victimless, the victim at least chose to do that to themselves.
Arms dealing on the scale of this movie results in governments being overthrown and people being massacred. It's not like arms dealers sell one person one gun, that could be rationalized as self defense. These guys perpetuate violence on a massive scale.