MovieChat Forums > Hitch (2005) Discussion > Eva Mendes as Sara Melas: (SPOILER)

Eva Mendes as Sara Melas: (SPOILER)


....was miscast. Prior to Hitch, I have enjoyed everything that Mendes has been in. I think she's a fine talent: attractive in the way men tend to like more than women, funny, and an above average film actress. But the character in this film posed a problem for Eva because with all of these excellent qualities, the character needed something that Eva couldn't provide: a likeability factor that is a natural part of an actress' personal on-screen persona. This is not just about good looks or acting talent, this belongs to the individual actress and his hers and hers alone. And not a lot of female film stars have this. Think a young Meg Ryan, or Audrey Hepburn, for example. In her prime, Meg Ryan could play an ax murderer and the audience would find it hard to not like her. Her character in Sleepless in Seattle wasn't the nicest person in the world. She was basically cheating (if only mentally) on her fiance, and she was a bit of a patronizing nag to him. Still, we rooted for her and Tom Hanks to get together. Why? Because Meg has or certainly had that 'je ne sais crois' that just pops off the screen and makes the audience like her.

The character of Sara Melas needed an actress who had that quality. (Don't ask me who fits the bill today, seeing as the producers had such rigid racial requirements.) Perhaps, their first choice of JLo was better. And not because Jennifer is better looking than Eva or even a better actress. But JLo has a higher likeability factor and just might have made the character of Sara Melas more appealing and understandable that Hitch would have fallen in love with her.

I give credit to Eva. She tried awfully hard. But she was clearly uncomfortable in this role. And I don't think the director helped her get it either. He made her turn the bitch part of Sara up too high. And Eva didn't know how to reign it down with the cutesy aspects of Sara's personality which might have endeared the audience to her. But a lot of that has to do with the character the writer created. Although his basic idea is good, very appealing and a lot of fun, he trapped himself in the creation of his main conflict by creating a character like Sara that was going to be hard to like. Face it: what's to like about a gossip columinist who makes their living being nosy and then sharing it with the rest of the world in spite of how it may hurt people. These people are SCUM! Nobody really likes them even if we feed on the gossip they put out there. Especially when you juxtapose her with a loveable character like Hitch who is honestly trying to help guys get the girl they love. Hitch is CUPID for men. The character Casey makes a good point when she wonders if he helps women. Women like Casey could use a female Hitch to help them out, which he, in fact, does at the end of the film.

When Sara gets all self-righteous with Hitch, based on erroneous info, about what he does, it's a classic case of the pot calling out the kettle. Actually, worse, because the audience LIKES what Hitch does, and not what Sara does for a living. (Maybe this is why JLo turned the part down, given her history with the tabloids. She probably felt, I hate these people, no way I want to play one.) To make the Hitch/Sara relationship work, the role called for an actress who we can't help but liking no matter what her character is. Eva simply doesn't have that as part of her assets. But I can't help but feeling that as good as the script was, the writer trapped himself by creating a character that would rely so heavily on the actress' personal persona/charisma to make it work.

The toughest scene in the movie was the scene when Sara goes to Hitch's apartment and acts really bitchy. Eva played it way too bitchy, when it really was a scene about her being hurt, disappointed and even heart-broken. If you watch Will Smith in this scene, he, too, is uncomfortable. He was like, 'this broad is so bitchy I don't even like her now.' So how could we root for them to get together. When characters like this fight in a movie, their fight is suppose to be fraught with sexual tension, it's a substitute for love-making. In a comedy like this, the audience is supposed to be laughing at them, because we know what's really going on. In this scene, by the time they were throwing the salad, it really wasn't funny anymore.

But my biggest criticism is reserved for the writer. Finally, the script was too self-conscious about trying not to be a corny love story. It's clear the writer was trying to say, my people are cool. At the end, when Hitch tells Sara: "I love you!" Her response is: "If I say it back now, it will sound stupid." Excuse me? Sara needs to say it back. We need to hear Sara say it back! By trying so hard NOT TO BE CORNY, he made Sara a bitch to the end. Why should we want Hitch to wind up with a broad like that? Wrong move, writer and director, too. It's the freakin end of the movie. Hearing a character say "I love you" is like the pay off pitch. Sara not saying it back, sounded stupid!

But the movie still made $300 million +..... WTF do I know?

reply

and this is why this thread has no comments

reply

Actually, I agree with you, mzladymoon-1. I didn't like Sara/Eva from the start because she tried to hard. Plus, she was supposed to be a very serious journalist but she's a gossip columnist? Not to diss gossip columnist, but that didn't really enforce the idea of her being the best journalist.

Thumbs up with you said about young Meg Ryan. You nailed it.

"When Sara gets all self-righteous with Hitch, based on erroneous info, about what he does, it's a classic case of the pot calling out the kettle. Actually, worse, because the audience LIKES what Hitch does, and not what Sara does for a living."

Exactly! I sympathised more with Hitch, but something else was this: why was she even angry with him? Sure, I see that she thinks he caused her friend to be hurt, so far in the movie, there was nothing to show that dating doctors were bad. Her attack on him seemed unjustified, even with what happened to her friend. (On a side note, I think her friend was played too soft and kinda air headed.)

JustJosh.org

reply

Thanks for your comments. I was hoping that someone out there would understand my point of view. I like coming to this board to read the what people are feeling about movies. There seemed to be this concensus that Eva lacked something in the role. And so I decided to have my say. It's alright if no one responded.

I think the studios get away with a lot of murder and what's good about the imdb board is we're able to call them on it. The movie made money for the following reasons:

1. Will Smith
2. Great premise/story idea
3. Will Smith
4. Kevin James
5. Will Smith
6. Eva Mendes' body
7. Will Smith

Just because it made $300+ doesn't mean it's above criticism. Sara's character had some big problems that had it not been for the great premise, Will Smith's likeability factor and Kevin James' humor, not to mention that Eva Mendes is nice to look at (which means a lot to the guys taking their girlfriends to the movie. They really could care less if Sara's a - B-word rhymes with Hitch, as long as Hitch gets to bang her in the end.)

Story-wise I was not satisfied. Sara getting angry at Hitch was one of the all-time contrived moments in film. It simply didn't make sense given what she does for a living and the fact that what Hitch does isn't bad at all. The love doctor didn't have a BAD reputation. It was just that one guy who was a jerk and I think her dizzy girlfriend just confused the whole thing. I can't believe that jerk told her that Hitch helped him.

And the end: Sara should have said I love you! Even if she had to cough it out.

reply

lol yup

reply

I think Eva Mendes was an OK choice of an actress, but I think other Hispanic/Latina women could have filled the role easily also. Some names that come to mind are Rosario Dawson or Eva Longoria. I know that Rosario Dawson is still in the "up-in-coming" category as an actress, but I think she contains the "likable" factor that the original poster had mentioned. Eva Longoria would have the likable factor also, just because of the fact that she is on one of the most popular American television programs at the time Hitch was made.

I think that Jennifer Lopez would have been a poor casting choice. She is too full of herself, and doesn't play vulnerable too well. Sara Melas had a vulnerable side that needed to be portrayed. I think Eva Mendes pulled it off gracefully, but like the original poster stated, she overplayed the bitchy part.

All in all, I think the movie did not particularly suffer because of Mendes' acting, but it could have been improved.

How long till this goes away?

reply

[deleted]

I don't get why it should be an actress of Latin-American origin playing Sara Melas, it is just stated that she was of Spanish origin (that's in Europe, as far as I know)and Spaniards don't look like her, any actress could have done it, an white actress with dark hair would be closer to the "typical" Spanish woman

Everything you know is wrong!
(Watch more TV)

reply

she was a hateable carachter, mad at the world for no reason at all...hot, but unlikeable in every way....

reply

> Story-wise I was not satisfied. Sara getting angry at Hitch was one of the all-time contrived moments in film. It simply didn't make sense given what she does for a living and the fact that what Hitch does isn't bad at all. The love doctor didn't have a BAD reputation. It was just that one guy who was a jerk and I think her dizzy girlfriend just confused the whole thing. I can't believe that jerk told her that Hitch helped him.

Yeah, would have been much more interesting to see Sara continue with her clever skills of investigating people and not just jump to conclusions with Hitch. It was stupid to follow her friend's assumptions. Maybe gossip columnists really do believe the *beep* that they write! They could have done more with her career choice. I enjoyed watching her, though. I didn't find her unlikeable, particularly. Just her motivations were out of whack in the script. It was corny and uninteresting that people would set aside their brains and stay in love with someone if it doesn't make sense. I would rather see it sewn up neatly, making perfect sense.

reply

I totally agree with what you said about the fight scene. It wasn't funny or entertaining; there was bad feeling behind it. Mendes being a bitch is REALLY bitchy.

I thought the writers were pretty good though. And I don't know if what you said about the movie making $300 m dollars was ironic or not, but you can't judge the quality of a movie on how much money it makes....

And about the racial requirements - I think it would have been a better idea to cast the best and most likeable actress regardless of race. I know that sounds a little a) obvious and b) pretentious, but it's totally true. Then maybe we wouldn't have been stuck with the annoying Eva Mendes.

reply

[deleted]

Those are the hormones talking, pal.

reply

I didn't like her in that role either. I agree that she wasn't very "likable". Despite being pretty, I had a hard time believing that a character like Hitch would try so hard to woo someone like her.

reply

[deleted]

You know how I know you're gay? You don't like Eva Mendes.

I've been drinking green tea all goddamn day!

reply

mzladymoon-1,

I respect and understand your thoughts about Eva Mendes playing Sara Milas in this role. But I must, with all due respect, disagree. I think that Eva played the part very strongly and really showed the audience that "brick wall" that she has put up to block her from meeting someone so when Alex Hitchens (Will Smith) breaks down this "brick wall" we understand truly how much of a "lady charmer" he is. Also, I think it was the director and the filmmaker's intention to make her so stubborn that we can't really like her too much and it shows her personality in a realistic way, not just some fairy tale "princess".

reply


I respect and understand your thoughts about Eva Mendes playing Sara Milas in this role. But I must, with all due respect, disagree.

This is just plain funny.

pardon my abruptness, but
a seven nation army couldn't hold me back

reply

"(...)certainly had that 'je ne sais crois' (...)"

that made my last five minutes.

she's got that "i don't know how to believe"

reply

[deleted]

the first poster is right.
The actress was miscast. A romantic comedy is all about likability and she is not that likable. To the viewer, Hitch is just too good for her. Even as the heroine is rejecting the hero, which always happens in the beginning, there has to be some charm there, some promise of softness. The actress was lacking in that department. She seemed a hard person.

That scene in Hitch's apartment was wrong. The actress seemed really mean, really a disagreeable person. She was too angry for romantic comedy. Not a person you would like a nice guy like Hitch to end up with.

reply

Agreed! I love the movie but watching how that character interacts with the others irritates me. Right from the beginning, she reeks of self-interest, over-simplification (she's a gossip columnist, after all), ethical flaws and other things which men find NOT sexy. She sees men as predators and women as victims. It’s all black and white, with women on the right side of course. No wonder she’s single by her own fault. Not that she WANTS to be single. The things she says about relationships is just rubbish. If she really believes that, she’s likely to end up a lonely and bitter old maid, believing her own garbage that if she ended up like that, it’s the men’s fault. And she says she’s a “realist”? Give me a f…break!!! What about all the women who wouldn’t share her point of view and are actually happy in their relationships? They are wrong and deceive themselves, and self-righteous and stuck-up Sara Melas is obviously right, anyway, because she a “realist”?! Well, Ms Melas, we don’t all share the same reality. Just thinking there are actually women who behave like that makes me want to spread those words Hitch says during the speed dating scene (explaining why he does what he does). I feel more sympathy for Albert (who wouldn’t?) or even finds Sara’s boss more likeable than her. Instead of bitching about ‘male ego’ and what men do wrong “because they are men”, she should do some introspection and realise that women are surely no better. We are just different.
That's why I don't find this character likeable and wonder how Hitch ends up with her, anyway. “And there's only one person that makes me feel like I can fly... That's you”. He seems to be the easily forgiving type of guy: she has just destroyed his career by her reckless and selfish so-called “search for truth” without checking her sources and only as misguided revenge. Like clipping Cupid’s wings with her article. After all, she’s only a man-hating and vindictive gossip columnist (only exaggerating a tad). I know, it’s a just a character from a movie, but there are women like her in the “real” world.
“Any guy can sweep any girl off her feet, he just needs the right broom”, rightfully says Hitch. Sara Melas is the kind of girls who’d get ready to break that broom of yours without thinking twice about what you have to offer. And Hitch lives in New York. I mean…there are loads of nice girls who would give any presentable man his "fighting chance".

=============================
"I just want to be inspired."

reply

I absolutely agree with what the majority has already stated. I absolutely LOATHED Eva's character and could not believe WHY Hitch likes her to begin with and wishes to fight for her. There was absolutely no likeability about her at all. She's mad at Hitch while she's the one writing dirt on people on the daily basis and ruining lives and careers? The OP is right. If it was any other actress but Mendes playing Sara Melas, just imagine the young Meg Ryan, we would be definitely rooting for Hitch and Sara to get together in the end, for the tension to finally resolve and to see the kiss and feel the relief and happiness. I felt nothing like that. I just kept thinking "Why the *beep* does Hitch like her so much to begin with? She just ruined his career and was a total bitch throughout the whole movie. Teh *beep*

Glad I'm not the only one. This was a very lovely movie but because of the horridly unlikeable female character it went from 7 to a 5 score for me.

Procrastinators unite!........tomorrow

reply

[deleted]