MovieChat Forums > Ratatouille (2007) Discussion > 3 gaping plot holes with the ending

3 gaping plot holes with the ending


1. With the amount of time Linguini spent in the kitchen with Remy controlling his movements, watching what Remy was having him make, you would think by the end of the movie that Linguini would have learned how to cook some of those things and he wouldn't have been hopelessly lost without Remy, unless he was a complete idiot.

2. The health inspector says to Skinner over the phone it would take him 3 months to go to Gusteau's to conduct his inspection, unless "somebody cancels their appointment." However, he shows up pretty much the next day, meaning, unless he was just speaking figuratively to Skinner, that every single person who he had an appointment with for the the course of those 3 months cancelled within a day, which has snowball's chance in Hell of happening. And since when do restaurants schedule appointments for the health inspector to conduct their inspections? Don't health inspectors usually show up unannounced, to catch those in violation with their pants down? That's pretty much what he does at Gusteau's, which leads me to...

3. The health inspector has Gusteau's shut down, upon discovering that rats have been in the kitchen. So, Linguini, Collette, Ego, and the rats start their own new restaurant, that has its kitchen run by rats. But if the health inspector comes in unannounced to catch them with their pants down, like he did with Gusteau's, the place will only stay open a year, if not a month, before it gets shut down, too. What a depressing ending.

reply

1. his an idiot
2. he was speaking figuratively
3. Who cares?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9n2UyctImKs

reply

wrt: "Who cares?"

Yes. That's what's operative here. Ratatouille achieves something rare in narrative: Its myth is truly compelling. In the face of that beautiful mythic payload, little nitty-picky oversights like that pale.

--
And I'd like that. But that 5h1t ain't the truth. --Jules Winnfield

reply

1.yeah i tought so too. + he was the legendary cooks son

2.yeah i agreet. but in the same time,if he comes unannounced,of course he would say 3 months,because then they wouldnt have cleaned up if he come earlier.

3. yeah.

reply

1- He didn't pay much attention and could not memorize and improvise as well as Remy did.

2- I don't recall the amount of time between Skinner's call and that inspection. If it was really a day, perhaps he was just being grumpy and not really serious. Or maybe he just decided to show up as such a request was really unusual. Or maybe Skinner offered a bribe at another phone call we never get to see.

3- Perhaps Ego later explained that the rats were doing it, and people accepted it as long as they were kept clean.

"You keep him in here, and make sure HE dosen't leave!"

reply

This is one of my favorite Pixar films. The funny thing is, I can give many, many reasons why I like it, but this really only touches the surface and doesn’t fully explain why it affects me as deeply as it does. I agree that the story structure is a tad unwieldy and there are a few plot holes and strange contrivances, but none of this stops me from loving this movie.

If you watch the extra features on the DVD (or read interviews, Wikipedia, or whatever), it’s evident that the film had a troubled production history, so that likely explains at least some of the story flaws. Here’s my take on the problems you mention:

1. This one really bothered me the first time I saw the film. I came into the movie not knowing anything about the story other than its most basic elements, so I was expecting that Remy would not only become a famous chef himself, but that he also would, in some way, teach Linguini the art of fine cooking. Needless to say, that didn’t happen, and it bugged me at the time that Linguini seemed to experience so little character growth.

My opinion is a bit different now, though, and I think I understand Linguini’s character and motivations better. Linguini is introduced in the film as an awkward, scared, not very bright, totally incompetent kid who is thrown into a situation WAY over his head. Remy provides him with the opportunity to look like he actually knows what he’s doing and, as a result, keep his job and survive (okay, in a figurative sense) to the next day. Linguni is happy to go along with this strategy; without it, he would fail, since he has no natural talent for cooking. I think the reason he can’t absorb anything that Remy is “teaching” him is twofold. Firstly, he is just trying to get through each arduous day at work without revealing Remy. That would put a lot of pressure on anyone, especially someone as frightened and insecure as Linguini. Secondly, he has a major crush on Colette, so he is constantly distracted by her while Remy is directing him to make these amazing dishes. At the end of the film, he is in charge of the restaurant, but without Remy’s guidance, he’s completely panicked and unable to think straight, even if he HAD remembered a few things about cooking. I appreciate the scene where Linguini finally tells the truth about Remy, at the same time standing up for himself and exuding confidence that he’s never really shown before. What Linguini actually gained from Remy was confidence--not cooking ability or intelligence--so I think this is Linguini’s real character arc.

2. I agree with what other posters have been saying. The health inspector probably meant it in a figurative sense. Otherwise, I’m at a loss to explain what was going on.

3. This is another one that I can’t completely explain. The first time I saw the movie, I thought it was a monster of a plot hole. Still, in a film where rats can read, make boats and musical instruments, cook food, use a live human as a puppet, and so forth, I guess an apparently popular restaurant full of rats shouldn’t be too hard to accept. Anton Ego also seems to have a fair bit of clout, so even though Remy says that his review of Gusteau’s cost him his credibility as a critic, there must be lots of people who would still support him. Maybe there was some underhanded dealing that allowed an exception to be made for Ego.

reply

[deleted]

The third point is an interesting one to consider (although these aren't plot holes....really?).

It's possible Linguini and Remy "go public" with their secret.....but if they did that and people were fine with it, I doubt Gusteau's would've been shut down in the first place.

I would think the rats would have a system in place where they could quickly hide upon the inspector's arrival. When the inspector knocks on the door, the rats know what to do and head for their hiding place. As long as restaraunt is kept clean, the inspector wouldn't know and it would be fine.

reply

1)
Linguini doesn't really have the skills to cook. Plus, I don't think the events of the film took place long enough for him to learn much. He learns some of the basics from Collette, but it's largely Remy who has the skills- Linquini is mainly the puppet.

2)
Yes, it is a one in a billion chance that the Health Inspector would have a cancellation so soon, but to me, I didn't really think much of that. Besides, I can't help but wonder about some of the underlying workings on BuyNLarge, humanity, and the spacecruisers in 'Wall-E.' Plus, very few people acknowledge the implausibility for Muntz to still be alive in 'Up.' Almost every Pixar film has a few things where you either go with the flow, or just complain.

3)
I figure Anton Ego is in on the secret as well, as Remy mentions he's taken on the role of a 'small business investor.'

Besides, I figure it's largely Remy and Collette doing the work, and Remy's family doesn't actually come into the kitchen as a fail-safe.

Besides, how many people are going to believe that 'a rat can prepare food for human consumption?'


"Thanks, guys." "So long, partner."

- Toy Story 3 (9/10)

reply

Let's say my answers may totally contain bias because I am a huge fan of the movie. However, if you don't mind reading...

1. the movie's about such kind of sheer irony, for one thing. The biological son of the "God of cooks" is totally ignorant in cooking. His purpose in the movie is to serve as a human shell to deflect all the human stereotypes and prejudices against a cooking rat. While on the other hand, Remy, the last one on the earth to lawfully inherit Gusteau's legacy, was actually the spiritual inheritor to everything Gusteau believes, thus becoming somewhat a Jesus-figure in the main story arc (thinking about how Jesus was a carpenter from Nazareth). Besides, "everyone can cook" is just a fundamental statement in Gusteau's "gospel", to which Gusteau himself explained, "although not everyone's equally gifted". I fell in love with cooking since watching Ratatouille, and I know that lots of my friends still find cooking a pain in the arse even though they were quite inspired by my story about how a nerd can learn to cook better than most of his neighbours.

The ending of the movie, in my opinion, is very touching in the way that Linguini can finally drop the pretensions, and allow Remy to shine in cooking with more freedom and more appreciation. You may notice that the story kinda began with all kinds of misplacements, like Remy had to endure the family requirements while what he truly desired was to become a cook; Gusteau's legacy ending up in the wrong hands, that is, Skinner's hands; Linguini got involved in the situation that was way over his head; Anton Ego continuing his career as a critic although all he represented at the time were gloomy, hypocritical, tasteless and did no good to anyone--including himself. The main story is about how to survive all these stereotypes, hypocrisies, prejudices and pretensions. It's really bittersweet if you consider what Remy had to go through. Just think about how much all these had changed in the course of the movie, and I guess your attention won't be too much on this "plot hole".

2. Isn't that the point? The inspector said he will probably come in 3 months, but showed up immediately to catch whatever he wanted to catch.

3. I don't know how the bureaucrats work in French, but here in China, they totally can shut your restaurant down in no time if they really want to do so. Although the inspector along with Skinner were likely to sound crazy when they accuse Linguini and guys of "letting hundreds of mouses cook", they are likely to hire alternative means to enforce their interests, too. Besides, did anyone mention the fact that they were duct-taped and locked away illegally?

Hope it helps.

We scare because we care.

reply

Yep I cannot add anything to that you summed it up perfectly it was a heartwarming and immensely enjoyable movie in a world where disaster, death , violence , foul language and nudity seem to be the norm in movies - sometimes its nice to just forget all that and just float off into fantasy land - unfortunately some people dont have the fantasy/on switch.

As to the three main points - who thinks these things up? its a cartoon animation , a movie , fun - who cares about small inconsequential issues like those - the idea is to loose yourself in the movie and just enjoy!!!!

I dont have to add that the animation was some of the best I have ever seen in a cartoon/animation/pixar film - Definitely my favourite animated movie.

Love the morality lessons at play - I.e. Dont steal and always be honest and good things will come your way.

For playing to children AND adults its a good lesson for life.

Kinda reminds me of the era in which movies were larger than life ie. Wizard Of Oz.

Even the title of the movie was clever.

Everyone I know gave it a 10/10 - women in particular seem to just love it and I can see why.

reply

its just a kids movie, it doesn't need to make sense, if you are seriously are Looking this much into it, then you need to get a Life

Snootchie Bootchie

reply

[deleted]