MovieChat Forums > The Box (2009) Discussion > A hateful screenplay

A hateful screenplay


****spoilers abound****


Leave aside the messiness of this screenplay--typified by the "comforting" ending with its 'oh, we'll see each other in heaven' emoting, which mixes poorly indeed with the idea that the instrument of this Divine Providence is an entity that thinks nothing of making zombies of people, manipulating events to make people poor and frightened (so they'll be more likely to fail their moral test), and maiming children.

Beyond all that, this screenplay contains some loathsome and revolting messages.

Number one for me: the message that it's better to COMMIT MURDER and to leave a child effectively parentless than for that child to be blind and deaf. As if being blind and deaf were almost literally 'a fate worse than death.'

How delightful for people who are actually blind and deaf to get kicked in the head by the popular culture yet again. How hateful of Kelly to provide them with this kick in the head. (Yes, even blind and deaf people manage to find out what's in movies. They are not inanimate objects. They are people who don't deserve this sort of thoughtless treatment.)


Number two: the "woman is the downfall of mankind" message. Yes, I know that Kelly's defenders (against the charge of misogyny for having all three 'button pushers' shown in the movie be women) cite the line spoken by the police chief. But what is SHOWN is what counts in a movie. I could almost guarantee that if all three button-pushers shown happened to be, say, black---if, say, the movie compared white couples confronted with The Box to black couples---then people would not be so openly defending Kelly.

The 'oh, it's mythic, an evocation of the legends of Adam & Eve and of Pandora, wow, so profound!!1!' excuses would be exposed for what they are, if not for the fact that we're pretty much "okay" with dumping on females in this culture. Again, if it had been a contrast between black and white people (as opposed to between male and female), the bigotry would have been considered inexcusable.


...a somewhat less significant Number Three is the fetishizing of physical deformity. I'd concede that this is merely unpleasant, as opposed to hateful.

But on the whole, this is a nasty screenplay (and movie). It's a shame, as Richard Matheson's original idea is so thought-provoking and interesting.

reply

I believe you missed the overall point, sure you can get those ideas. But, you do forget that it is also the woman who is willing to lay down her life in order to not have her child suffer in anyway.

You completely bypass over the fact that Cameron's character lived the majority (18 years) of her life maimed and how she knows what it's like and would rather die (for her mistake) than see her son have to deal with that. If that's a terrible message, I'm not sure how many movies you do enjoy.

There were messages of unconditional love and presented the choice would you yourself give your life to make a loved one not have to suffer? Especially if they had to suffer for a mistake of your own?

It seems like you pointed out everything you could in order to throw the sexism charges at Kelly..while I'm not huge on his films..I believe this is misguided. The men did nothing but watched as the button was pushed and were too weak to make any action of their own. The women were the ones bold enough to make a decision one way or another. Also if you forget there were lines such as, "It's OUR choice" as it wasn't simply the woman deciding what to do.

Also, you failed to make any connection between the sexes matching up with the "button push" and who has to sacrifice their lives. That fit together well, some more thought should have went into your opinions on the film.

reply

Hateful screenplay.........,makes the word absurd sound like a big understatement.
Where do people come from with such ideas?Mmhh,no that is not an idea.

reply

[deleted]

When are you going to run for office? Maybe you should organize a protest with deaf/blind women and have a sit-in in Kelly's driveway. Also, you should have thrown the word feminist and misogynistic in there for a better intellectual flavor. Why did you leave homosexuals and undocumented immigrants out of that too? Seems to fit the rest of the message.

In all, I think you were reviewing a family member instead of a science fiction movie. I sympathize with you. It gets a little confusing when you stare at a box more than 50% of the time while you are awake.

reply

[deleted]

>>As if being blind and deaf were almost literally 'a fate worse than death.'

I think it is. I believe that many people think it is too. When you actually consider what a life in silent darkness would be like, I can't imagine anyone thinking it's better than death.

reply