I'm so sick of hearing this


"50 year old ugly guy and 20 year old hottie". So many people complain that it isn't believable because the mismatched looks and age.

It had NOTHING to do with their looks. They connected on a deeper level, maybe even a once in a lifetime connection.

That can happen with any person of any age in the strangest most unexpected place.

If you keep repeating about their ages and looks you are clueless to this type of connection and...

1) I feel sorry for you

2) I hope you are lucky enough to experience it

reply

Yeah, man. I'm with you.

I think the reason people keep reiterating that statement is because of factors extraneous to the film itself. They are actually annoyed by the trends in Hollywood which stop actress' careers after they hit their mid-thirties, but allow actors to play romantic leads into their twilight years. These people are right: there's a lot of sexism in Hollywood. On a systemic basis, it's an issue that should be dealt with and will, hopefully, change.

But, on an individual level, there's nothing wrong with telling the story of a May-December romance. Lost in Translation showed us an amazing connection and shining bond between two people in unusual circumstances. Harold and Maude is a rare role reversal of the same old-young paring.

People who complain are probably really angry or irked by "the system", and have allowed their judgement of Lost in Translation to be affected by that (external) reality.

reply

Brilliant post OP, I completely agree.

x

reply

I totally agree with you. Age has very little to do with a successful relationship and a sense of humour is sometimes more of a virtue than good looks. You can find your soulmate in the strangest of places.

reply

I feel this way as well. This movie shows a relationship that most people will never experience. You can see they were even confused by what they shared. It is not a relationship about lust. They are both at such different times in their lives, but are both feeling unfulfilled. Both starting out in new territories. It is beautiful that being in Tokyo at this one specific time they can open up to each other. They grow and learn and grow from each other, and know they will never find this kind of relationship again. That is what makes the end so sweet. They know all of this and they let it go.

reply

Re "2)," I don't.

This is just how shallow and stupid people are now. It's completely predictable that twits would be out here saying this ("50-year-old ugly guy, etc."). To paraphrase from the New Testament, "The shallow and stupid we always have with us."

reply

They connected on a deeper level

There you have the problem.
those who are only able to see and experience the superficial things in life don't even know what you meant with "deeper level". The next thing they would answer is probably something along: "Lel, go suck a bag of di<k you faggit!".

It is just the world we live in by now...

reply

My only argument to this is that he is a world Famous movie star and she is very beautiful and young. Youth and beauty to men and Fame and money to women are exactly the kind of superficial things that fool people into believing they are really seeing something deeper especially in the short term and it kept me from fully buying into this movie.

reply

That can happen with any person of any age in the strangest most unexpected place.
Definitely!🐭

reply

Well I guess so. However, they could have picked a better actor than acne faced Bill Murray. As well as someone who can really act and not some hipster icon.

reply

"Acne faced Bill Murray"

You don't get it....

reply

While Scarlett is just perfect, I think Bill Murray is way too morose for the part, especially at the beginning. First impressions count. What draws her to him? Like 'faint heart never won fair lady.' But therein lies the attraction for many wistful old men. He needs her. Needs her like no randy young ram needs her. As a salve for his tired old soul. It's all heart-renderingly beautiful.

reply