Of any alias's he supposedly used at any of the jobs he supposedly impersonated. There are a few things that check out: he was wanted for cheque fraud and he has a successful company based on his knowledge of bank fraud BUT: the jobs, years, names, places and amount of money he swindled do not hold up. Check out his Wikipedia entry under "veracity of claims". Frank has admitted his book was ghost written and details altered. He claims his stories don't check out because all the companies he swindled are "embarrassed" And so all records were destroyed. Ya. Right!
Most movies "based on a true story" have plenty of scenes, plot elements and characters that are completely fictional. Really, you could say "based on a true story" or "inspired by a true story" about almost any movie, since most movies have at least one element that is drawn from reality. (Someone buying groceries, someone driving, someone going to school, someone shooting a gun, etc.)
I see that claim ("based on a true story") as something of a joke and judge the movie on its own merits. If the movie works, then I'm satisfied, whether or not it accurately portrays some supposedly true story or not.
Look, it's quite simple: When Abignail's book first came out, a reporter did some fact checking and couldn't find any evidence of someone using Abignail's aliases who posed as a doctor or a pilot or any of the other things Abginale claimed he did. When confronted with this discrepancy, Abignale at first claimed that the companies in question were simply embarrassed and didn't want to own up to the fact that they were conned by a 16-year old, so they had destroyed all the evidence. When this excuse started to fall apart in the face of scrutiny, he changed his story and claimed that he had deliberately altered the details so as not to embarrass the companies. Around the time the movie came out, he changed his story a third time and claimed that, in fact, the writer of the book had embellished certain details but that the narrative was still mostly factual.
In other words, Abignale has been lying his butt off for decades and has come up with at least three different excuses for why nobody can verify any of his claims.
Wikipedia doesn't hold up, it can be altered by anyone. I know people who have purposely changed things on the site, just for fun. These people hacked Wikipedia, because they were tired of people using it as an encyclopedia (I am tired of the same thing, but don't care to look at the site, let alone take the time to change anything on it). You could say that you gave birth to Queen Elizabeth II is you want, and it will be up there until a moderator comes upon it and checks the veracity (or not). Just look at how many things do not have sources on Wikipedia, or the source material, that is on there, aren't primary sources (which is what we scientists will only use). Frank Abignale mentions the people that helped him write his books, as do most authors. It brings to mind the author James Patterson, who currently holds the title for having the most books published. Have you noticed how many of his books are co-authored though? Someone who can't get a book published under their name alone (or won't sell as many, if any books with just their name), in his genre, can contact him or his publishing house, add his name ABOVE their own, and there is the "new James Patterson" novel. Having someone co-write is another thing. You may have the idea, but don't know how to put it all down, that is why you have a co-writer and editors. If you read Frank Abognale's books, and not Wikipedia, you will see that credit is given where needed.
I think there's no doubt the authorities were glad to finally catch up with him and then glad that he came onside with them.
As others have indicated above, does every t need to be crossed and every i dotted in this story? The guy clearly was an extremely talented counterfeiter and conman. He made a successful career on both sides of the law out of his talents and this film attests to that.🐭
Exactly. When Abagnale was in fact in prison between the summer of 1965 and Christmas 1968, when he was supposed to be pulling off these major scams, his whole story collapses by this fact alone.
I think it would be more than a case of the companies being "embarrassed." E.g., Someone who was a patient at that emergency room when he was the intern and nursing supervisor, and had treatment that didn't work out well, could sue the hospital for negligence for letting an imposter be in charge.
Never any question of that. Frank Abagnale sat down with Stan Redding for a few interviews (I had heard two) and told his story. Then Abagnale turned it over to him and he wrote the actual book.