It is easier to kill the unsuspecting defenceless than the armed enemy, it happens during all invasions, insurrections, and civil wars, all sides commit such crimes.
From a practical viewpoint they should have thanked her for undermining enemy morale, most occupying forces try and enforce a non-fraternisation rule to avoid troops acquiring divided loyalties, or even a balanced view of the situation.
The structural effect is that we lose all sympathy for the resistance "fighters", who seem to have no effect on the occupation. I say "seem", in the context of the film, in reality I'm sure that was not the case.
reply
share