ARE LOVERS OF THIS FILM JUST CHILDISH?
I'm getting increasingly confused by conflicting reviews. Nobody gives their age, qualifications, profession or favourite film. The "Lovers" and "Haters" reviews just contradict each other, for no apparent reason.
I'm 70, with an MA in sociology and psychology, am a retired teacher and my favourite film is "LA Confidential".
I've seen "28 Days" twice. The first time on TV and the second, just recently on rented DVD, having forgotten I'd already seen it.
The first time I saw it I struggled through it for being a devoted Bullock fan.
The second time, as I started to realize that I'd already seen it, I also found that I could not believe how utterly stupid it was.
The fact that the beginning is, for some reason, an exact copy of "Four Weddings and a Funeral" (which was very good) is by the way, but very unsettling, nonetheless.
If I can centre on just one of its many faults can I point out that a person who is drunk does not necessarily keep giggling inanely at everything she does wrong, including wrecking her sister's wedding cake. She is equally capable of becoming regretful and frustrated and saying *beep* or *beep* it!", very loudly, which might have seemed more convincing in this case, in the light of her being devoted to her sister and not really wanting to wreck her reception.
Is it then safe for me to assume that the "Haters" of this film are mature and that the "Lovers" are childish?
Having said which, does this, then, help me to know to whom I should turn for a reliable review of "Birth", where I notice the reviews are equally contradictory?
Half the films I rent on DVD turn out to be rubbish. It's not as if they are free. I'm starting to think I'd be better of getting books from the library. They are free and I can give them the once over before I borrow them. It's all very frustrating.