MovieChat Forums > Pirates of Silicon Valley (1999) Discussion > Bill Gates is still the richest man in t...

Bill Gates is still the richest man in the world.

posted 10 years ago by manco82
7 replies | jump to latest

But Microsoft is crumbling, mixed emotions!

[–] debunkerboy 10 years ago

MS isn't crumbling! MS is still growing year over year. Windows is on a slight decline and the trend isn't all that great for the OS side of things. But Office is still strong and the cloud services and other business side stuff has more than made up for the Windows slide. Apple and Google have stolen MS leader role for sure but the company isn't falling apart.

[–] charactercombo 9 years ago

On a yearly basis he rotates between himself, Jimmy Buffet, and Carlos Slim. While BG may not always be the richest person in the work, he at least readily give a portion of his fortune to other people in the world.

"No more talking from things that don't talk!" - Jaye Tyler

[–] insomniacmovie 8 years ago

On a yearly basis he rotates between himself, Jimmy Buffet, and Carlos Slim. While BG may not always be the richest person in the work, he at least readily give a portion of his fortune to other people in the world.

I didn't realize that there were enough Parrotheads in the world for Jimmy to overtake Bill.

[–] cyborgt800-1 10 years ago

Bill Gates is nowhere near the richest man in the world...he's just the richest that's too poor to be able to be obscure! Look at the Rothschilds if you want to see wealth.

The validity of my answers is highly dependent on the intelligence of the question..or lack thereof.

[–] Doc80 10 years ago

Do you need some more tinfoil?

[–] cyborgt800-1 10 years ago

Do you need glasses?

The validity of my answers is highly dependent on the intelligence of the question..or lack thereof.

[–] MillerJones (531) 3 years ago

As of 2021 he is still in the top 5.

How much wealth does a simple person really need these people should not be proud of this status.

Every one of these people are p***ks who want even more yet give nothing back.

I have to laugh at Rothchilds yes the family had wealth so what it's meaningless you are trying to compared a whole family which may have 10-20 members to one person also I suggest you look up the history of them