Portrayal is the big issue in this movie: the portrayal of Middle-Eastern people as a group of violent terrorists. The audience is manipulated into believing that even small children are enemy combatants who must be destroyed, and that their deaths are to be viewed as necessary--and celebrated--casualties of war. People can say that these children ARE enemy combatants-they has guns in their hands and were shooting in cold blood at marines. Within the world of the movie, there might be an ethical thought process.
But in the real world, this is undeniably racist. It's propaganda; it states that all Arabs--men, women, and children--are terrorists. All of them are bloodthirsty and a threat to good, strong, righteous, victimized American soldiers. Hitler might have painted a different picture: a Aryan soldier is arrested for killing an innocent Jewish family. When his case is investigated, it turns out that the family had cheated him and his wife and children of all their money, and were planning to poison them to stop the good Aryans from exposing them.
The parallels are strong and extremely frightening: is this what the American media has devolved to? Is our government actually trying to send the message that all Middle-Eastern peoples are dangerous and fair victims of war? Innocent civilians are killed everyday by bombers or American soldiers. Are we supposed to view the deaths of millions as "collateral damage", when we hold up the deaths of 3000 as a crime against humanity and a country?
9/11 was an enormous tragedy, and it--and its victims--should always be remembered. But we have to keep in mind that the deaths of Iraqi civilians are no less valuable than American civilians. America is the most powerful country in the world, and its has vastly neglected the responsibilities that this power gives it. 9/11 should not be an excuse to cause more suffering: it should have been a wake-up call to the way our shortcomings have affected the rest of the world, and what we can do so that other countries do not feel the need to attack us. So many lives would be saved by this, instead of the millions that have been lost.
This has gone off on a random tangent, and I'm sorry. Overall, my point is this: when people hold up racist portrayals of people, let's at least have the decency to admit the racism and try to heal the hurt it's caused.
People ask us if we love each other as much as it looks like we do, and we do. --Adam Pascal
the portrayal of Middle-Eastern people as a group of violent terrorists
Have you been living under a rock these past 75 years?
No, actually. Because the phrase "Middle-Eastern people" refers to the mass population of the Middle East. People who live the Middle East; Middle Eastern people. Yes, a select number of individuals from this population have committed horrible and violent crimes against other humans. A select number of individuals from the United States--and the UK, and Sweden, and China, and South Africa, and pretty much everywhere on the globe--have done so as well. They have the same psychos and criminals as we do, only born in a different country and taught to hate different things. What right do you have to single them out? 2)
But in the real world, this is undeniably racist. It's propaganda; it states that all Arabs--men, women, and children--are terrorists
Is it? Where does it say that?
It says that when it depicts a crowd of Arab men, women, and children firing guns at American soldiers like a bunch of--I don't know--terrorists. How many six-year-olds do you know of who like to shoot people and kill in cold blood? And don't throw the whole "they're taught to kill at age 3" thing at me, because it is not Islamic, or Arab, or ANYONE'S custom to teach a little kid to shoot and kill. It's an extremist thing for guerillas, and your prejudice shows through when you hold victims of abuse up like that as a generality for all Middle Eastern kids.
3)
a Aryan soldier is arrested for killing an innocent Jewish family. When his case is investigated, it turns out that the family had cheated him and his wife and children of all their money, and were planning to poison them to stop the good Aryans from exposing them.
Hitler would undoubtable have done so. However, your comparing Americans to Nazis is a particularly disgusting (and racist) peice of Godwinning:
And rather brazen, given that Arabs/Muslims sided with Nazis during WW-II and actively participated in the holocaust through the Muslim division of the Waffen SS under the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem
First of all, I'm glad you feel happy and superior about your whole Godwin thing, because you are a cool internet hax0r. I can phrase it in Tutsi/Hutu situations if you want, or Stalin, or any other situation where one group uses racism, hatred, and blatant propaganda to influence others to hate another group. Hitler is simply the most widely recognized; history's long, there are plenty of others.
Second, how ridiculous can you get? "You can't use a holocaust reference against anti-Middle Eastern propaganda, because the Muslims and Arabs helped Hitler!"
Okay, sure. So if someone starts massacring Germans, we can't say "genocide" because of the Holocaust, which happened years and years before most of the population was born. The white great-great-great granddaughter of a slave owner is sold into slavery in modern times: can't say "slavery" though, because her ancestor owned slaves. Woops, didn't know.
Propaganda is propaganda, and racism is racism. The people being harmed by it today are just as valuable as the people harmed in the Holocaust by propaganda and racism. Prove that I'm wrong, why don't you.
4)
the deaths of Iraqi civilians are no less valuable than American civilians
Fair enough. This movie isn't about Iraq. It's about Yemen.
And if you bother to put what I said in context, instead of snatching phrases out like a two-faced idiot politician, you'll note that I said that in a discussion about 9/11 and its affects on the world today. I was talking about the current war in Iraq, where the civilians happen to be Iraqi. But sure, if it makes you feel better: the deaths of Iraqi, American, AND YEMENI civilians are all equal in horror, grief, and needlessness.
5)
Overall, my point is this: when people hold up racist portrayals of people, let's at least have the decency to admit the racism and try to heal the hurt it's caused.
You mean like Arab society, the most virulently and institutionally racist in the world? Where Iranians are regarded on par with flies and monkeys? Where hatred for Jews is indoctrinated into 3 year olds? Where the protocols of the learned elders of zion are sold in every streetcorner? Where Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi immigrants are forced into labor camps and subjected to degrading and dehumanizing conditions? Where racial nationalism and Arabocentrist supremacism leads the Arab Janjaweed to conduct genocide of 250,000 blacks in Sudan?
I don;t see any Arabs admitting to this. Compared to all that, this film is nothing. Forgive me if I don't weep over you.
Arab society, the most racist society in the world. Okay, then...what about India, where Untouchables are treated WORSE than flies or monkeys? How about America, where kids were and are still taught to hate ANYONE of a non-Caucasian race and a non-Christian religion? Where there are TV shows and organizations and huge groups of people who use phrases like "God Hates Fags" and move away when black families move into theri neighborhoods? Where people sell pamphlets about burning in hell and striking down those who deny Christ? Where you can't get a job or a house if you happen to be the wrong race in the wrong place? Where street crime and hate crimes, much of it race and religion related, is higher than thousands of other countries?
The Middle East is not perfect, and there are many horrible parts of it. BUT THE SAME GOES FOR AMERICA. America is not perfect; in fact, it's notorious for bragging about tolerance and freedom when millions are denied both every day. And I'm sure you don't see any Arabs weeping, because if you did you might have to admit your own twisted racism and fake patriotism.
In other words, stop kvetching, stop blowing people up, and stop teaching your children to hate minorities. Then talk.
I'm sort of confused: of the two of us, you are the only one who seems to be on a hating-minorities and blowing-people-up tangent. And I won't stop kvetching, thanks; it's the only way to get people to listen to you in the country, apparently.
Pretend to give a damn about anyone other than yourself and your prejudices and superiority. Then talk.
People ask us if we love each other as much as it looks like we do, and we do. --Adam Pascal
reply share
First of all, I started this thread ABOUT A MOVIE. A movie that has racism themes and portrayals. Maybe you can throw out enough statistics and facts to prove that the racism is "justified" or something, but that doesn't make it not racist. And one of racism's worst qualities is that it lumps all the people it's directed against together. One statement cannot stand for millions. It's impossible.
Second of all, you're pulling the oldest computer Nazi trick of all time: wait until someone makes an assumption based on what you've written, then pop up with "U PIG I AM NOT THAT I AM SUMTHIN ELSE SHUTT UP!!!!1!!"
Okay then, you're not American. My apologies. If you've suffered badly at the hands of Arabs or someone related, I'm sorry, and I can understand how this might upset you. But my perspective is different from yours. If a black teenager killed a member of my family or kept threatening to kill me, I'd hate him. But no matter what I hate, that doesn't mean every single member of a race or culture deserves to be shot down.
I'm not going to pretend to see your side of it, because I don't know anything about you and I can't see what you see. My OP was just what I saw. And you don't know anything about me, so maybe accepting that will help you understand why I said it.
People ask us if we love each other as much as it looks like we do, and we do. --Adam Pascal
Yes. Sure. Totally. And hating things stubbornly without bothering to listen to anyone else is the right thing to do. The world has turned out so well when people take that route. I hope it makes you happy.
People ask us if we love each other as much as it looks like we do, and we do. --Adam Pascal
Yes, a select number of individuals from this population have committed horrible and violent crimes against other humans. A select number of individuals from the United States--and the UK, and Sweden, and China, and South Africa, and pretty much everywhere on the globe--have done so as well.
And many others have celebrated it. Very few have condemned it as they have condemned the reactions to 9/11. People from Sweden and the UK and the US have not celebrated the collateral damage in the middle east.
It says that when it depicts a crowd of Arab men, women, and children firing guns at American soldiers like a bunch of--I don't know--terrorists. How many six-year-olds do you know of who like to shoot people and kill in cold blood? And don't throw the whole "they're taught to kill at age 3" thing at me, because it is not Islamic, or Arab, or ANYONE'S custom to teach a little kid to shoot and kill. It's an extremist thing for guerillas, and your prejudice shows through when you hold victims of abuse up like that as a generality for all Middle Eastern kids.
How many movies show this kind of thing? A SELECT FEW - in your own words. So, why are you also generalising? Yes, they are victims of abuse. Probably, so was OBL.
First of all, I'm glad you feel happy and superior about your whole Godwin thing, because you are a cool internet hax0r. I can phrase it in Tutsi/Hutu situations if you want, or Stalin, or any other situation where one group uses racism, hatred, and blatant propaganda to influence others to hate another group. Hitler is simply the most widely recognized; history's long, there are plenty of others.
Agreed on this but the scales are vastly different, so the comparison may not be fair.
Okay, sure. So if someone starts massacring Germans, we can't say "genocide" because of the Holocaust, which happened years and years before most of the population was born. The white great-great-great granddaughter of a slave owner is sold into slavery in modern times: can't say "slavery" though, because her ancestor owned slaves. Woops, didn't know.
Agreed.
Propaganda is propaganda, and racism is racism. The people being harmed by it today are just as valuable as the people harmed in the Holocaust by propaganda and racism. Prove that I'm wrong, why don't you.
Disagreed. Humans are one race although the word racism is used quite freely nowadays. Besides, this movie is a story and not propaganda. Nazis killed unarmed Jews, unlike the story in this movie. Nazis tried to exterminate jews for a feeling of superiority and hatred. The actions taken by the army in this film were protective in nature against an armed attack.
And if you bother to put what I said in context, instead of snatching phrases out like a two-faced idiot politician, you'll note that I said that in a discussion about 9/11 and its affects on the world today. I was talking about the current war in Iraq, where the civilians happen to be Iraqi. But sure, if it makes you feel better: the deaths of Iraqi, American, AND YEMENI civilians are all equal in horror, grief, and needlessness.
Well put and agreed, except that you are talking about civilians which is out of context once you saw the complete movie.
Arab society, the most racist society in the world. Okay, then...what about India, where Untouchables are treated WORSE than flies or monkeys? How about America, where kids were and are still taught to hate ANYONE of a non-Caucasian race and a non-Christian religion? Where there are TV shows and organizations and huge groups of people who use phrases like "God Hates Fags" and move away when black families move into their neighborhoods? Where people sell pamphlets about burning in hell and striking down those who deny Christ? Where you can't get a job or a house if you happen to be the wrong race in the wrong place? Where street crime and hate crimes, much of it race and religion related, is higher than thousands of other countries?
The Middle East is not perfect, and there are many horrible parts of it. BUT THE SAME GOES FOR AMERICA. America is not perfect; in fact, it's notorious for bragging about tolerance and freedom when millions are denied both every day. And I'm sure you don't see any Arabs weeping, because if you did you might have to admit your own twisted racism and fake patriotism.
Partly agreed. But a war situation is still a war situation. And please visit India. At least in the towns and cities, you will find it hard to identify an "untouchable". I know many Indians living in the US. They feel safer there than in India, so I'm not sure where you get your statistics from. There are the double standards, yes, but frankly, in Yemen, that trial would NOT have happened. They would have protected their Childers, guilty or not.
reply share
Sorry, but just because a crowd (a relatively small one at that) turns violent in one scene in a movie that does not make the movie racist. Bad things happen in this world and just as it would be foolish to think that all Middle-Eastern people (which aren't exactly a "race") are like the crowd, it would also be foolish to think that all marines (or all black people) were like Jackson's character.
People who cry racism when there is no racism do a disservice to all people.
So let the healing begin and stop spreading your message of hate.
By claiming racism in this film or in any other instance where there is no racism you demonstrate a hatred for the truth and for those who have actually suffered from racism and for those who strive to be color-blind and treat people based upon the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.
Now that I've explained that to you, can you tell me how this film, which showed a small, but violent crowd of people attacking a foreign embassy in their home country as well as the suffering of innocents who were wounded in that very same country is in any way even remotely makes a "racist" statement against all people in the Middle East?
How is it not just as "racist" against Americans? Remember, there were Americans depicted in the movie who destroyed evidence and who lied under oath and also threatened to lie under oath. Childers was also depicted as someone who imagined he saw more weapons in the crowd than there actually were. He was also defended by a lawyer with a drinking problem who really wasn't that successful in his career - a loser if you will and everyone including himself knew it.
I believe anyone who saw racism in this movie is a bigot themselves. They tend to see small samples of certain types of people as representative of entire geographic regions of the world.
It seems to me that any depiction of anyone other than a white male that is less than perfect must be racist - and that is your message of hate.
By claiming racism in this film or in any other instance where there is no racism you demonstrate a hatred for the truth and for those who have actually suffered from racism and for those who strive to be color-blind and treat people based upon the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.
...what?
I'm sorry, I honestly don't understand. Claiming that racism exists where (you think) it actually doesn't shows hatred for the truth? What truth? The truth of not-racism? Also, I very much doubt that seeing racism in a movie is akin to hating those who "strive to be color-blind." I grew up in Cambridge, Massachusetts, I have met those who strive to be color-blind, and let me tell you, there's a little "truth" there and a LOT of wibbling and political dodging and just general denial.
Look, I don't really understand much of what you're saying. However, I do wish to respond to one thing: your claim that the film is just as "racist" against Americans as it is against Middle Eastern people.
There is a difference between "righteously going to war, defending your people, and struggling to maintain your honor even when others are all against you" and "pulling out a handgun that you constantly have on your person and shooting point-blank at enemy soldiers." The Americans in the movie are portrayed as fighting the good fight, their actions justified completely in the end. The Yemeni are shown as being wholly villains, just prop characters who exist for the Americans to fight. A little one-legged girl is shown to be a cold-blood killer, and anything that happens to her is justified; that doesn't sound racist to you? I don't want to alarm you, but the fact is that not every Middle Eastern child is an enemy combatant. Actually, very very few of them are. There is also a difference between fighting in a war and having to live in a war zone.
I believe anyone who saw racism in this movie is a bigot themselves. They tend to see small samples of certain types of people as representative of entire geographic regions of the world.
...that's because the movie SENDS THAT MESSAGE. Here's a sample of good 'ol American GIs being fired on by "peaceful" Yemeni who turn out to be evil, bloodthirsty murders. That is RACIST. Imagine a squad of white police offers being in a firefight with a black family: at first it seems that the family is being mercilessly slaughtered, but then it turns out they had semi-automatics AND fired first. And you should know that I'm not the only one who thinks this movie is racist. The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee described it as "probably the most racist film ever made against Arabs by Hollywood." Paul Clinton of the Boston Globe wrote "at its worst, it's blatantly racist, using Arabs as cartoon-cutout bad guys".
Wow, it's awful how the world teams up to spread a message of racism-sightings and hate.
People ask us if we love each other as much as it looks like we do, and we do. --Adam Pascal
reply share
You're right about one thing - you don't understand much of what I'm saying.
Have you seen many movies before? The scene with the girl firing was not how things really happened, but rather how it was being remembered by a character in the film.
Did you ever see the episode of All in the Family where they had to hire someone to come fix something? Archie, Meathead and Edith all retold the story as they recalled it. The stories were very different. This movie is not sending any of the messages you think it is sending. It does send the message that war sucks and innocents are sometimes hurt and even killed. It also sends the message the politicians are callous liars.
You see what you want and the AAADC (never heard of them) sees it as an opportunity to criticize the US (no surprise there)l.
It's no surprise that you're from one of the most racist parts of the US.
Was the Yemeni doctor a villain too? He's the one that showed Hodges the suffering that resulted from US troops. Were we supposed to think all those people were evil? If we were, do you really think the movie succeeded in that?
You'd think this was a KKK or neo-nazi propaganda film the way you and others describe it. If anything, it serves to remind us that not all people in Arab countries are cold-blooded killers - there are children and those who are innocent. Just because it depicts the reality that there are terrorists as well does not make it racist.
But, I might point out that in Northern Ireland I remember --years ago- a picture of a child throwing a brick/rock at British soldiers and a comment that spoke of it being in imitation of the adults. Children will follow the actions of the adults around them, who they are trying to impress and obey. So, it is not unrealistic to have children attacking the American troops along with the adults if the adults were to so act.
But, I'm not trying justify their slaughter.
And, the real danger in America is the fascist beast seeking some way to obtain power. Such elements must not be allowed to use anger at the Arabs to gain power and commit mass murder.
For this reason alone (and more), Arabs humanity must be protected. Who knows the life you save may be your own.