MovieChat Forums > Will & Grace (1998) Discussion > I preferred Nathan to Leo

I preferred Nathan to Leo

posted 10 years ago by PsychiatricPezDispenser
22 replies | jump to latest

I honestly so would have preferred Nathan to be the one to randomly come back into Grace's life than Leo. Leo totally brought down the quality of the show while he was on.

[–] !!!deleted!!! (64820750) 9 years ago

I wish they would've kept him too. Leo wasn't bad but people just naturally liked Nathan. Leo, IMO, tried too hard to get the audience to like him. Idk how to explain it, but I felt like his jokes looked so scripted and he said them like he wasn't even acting. Just like he was anticipating the audience to laugh. Nathan just did his jokes and they were seemed genuine...maybe it's just differences in their acting but I get what you mean.

Also, Leo cheated on Grace. That already makes him unlikable.

[–] fiero-49251 9 years ago

Even though Leo's been in movies and TV, he's more a "crooner!" The skillsets are totally different and Nathan's been doing comedy for 20-30 years! ;-)

- - http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/fiero425.html - - homepage

[–] Gothish 9 years ago

loved Nathan. Leo was a bore.

"Two gin and Frescas"
"Shaken, not ridiculed"

[–] m-brouzell 8 years ago

Hated both guys but Leo was the worst character on the show. Harry Connick Jr should be banned from tv most annoying actor ever.

[–] m-brouzell 8 years ago

Hated both guys but Leo was the worst character on the show. Harry Connick Jr should be banned from tv most annoying actor ever.

[–] BlairAbbey 8 years ago

Agree 100%. Nathan was my favourite.

[–] purplebear17 8 years ago

Nathan was a jerk Leo seemed nicer.