Satan is pretty much sold as a ladies man in End of Days, but I think that Satan would have no morals and fornicate with whichever sex he pleased..no matter which form he had taken Is this just a mainstream sell out to placate the homophobic masses? I think so.
He might be gay, he might be bi, he might be straight, he might even fly model planes, & he may even like surfing...but for the purpose of the movie he needs to get a WOMAN pregnant. Gay guys might want to be allowed to marry each other, but they can never give birth! So he has no choice (in the movie).
I would have like it better if he got her pregnant the way Kang (or is it Kodos?) got Marge Simpson pregnant... :)
Either way pretty crappy movie shamelessly cashing in on the Y2K scare, I'm glad I didn't pay to watch this stinker at a theater.
See this is what I don't get. Because Satan is not portrayed as in a homosexual light, the movie is a sellout to homophobic masses. If he was portrayed as having sex with men, then it would be deemed as signifying that homosexuality is evil.
You need to stop putting hidden agendas and meanings to things that have none. Satan bones a few broads in the movie. There is nothing more to it than that. Don't like it, watch a different movie.
You may have a point. Since it's a sin against God for another man to lie down with another man (homosexuality) Romans 1:24-28. And Satan is an anti-christ, he would probably would go both ways.
I KNEW IT! A movie about Arnold Schwarzenegger fighting evil forces to prevent the birth of the anti-Christ at the turn of the millenium while at the same time falling for and saving a woman who was chosen from birth to bear the child, and some laaaaame *beep* on IMDB was going to call someone homophobic.