MovieChat Forums > End of Days (1999) Discussion > Would Satan really be heterosexual?

Would Satan really be heterosexual?


Satan is pretty much sold as a ladies man in End of Days, but I think that Satan would have no morals and fornicate with whichever sex he pleased..no matter which form he had taken
Is this just a mainstream sell out to placate the homophobic masses?
I think so.

reply

So you're saying homosexuals have no morals?

reply

[deleted]

He might be gay, he might be bi, he might be straight, he might even fly model planes, & he may even like surfing...but for the purpose of the movie he needs to get a WOMAN pregnant.
Gay guys might want to be allowed to marry each other, but they can never give birth! So he has no choice (in the movie).

I would have like it better if he got her pregnant the way Kang (or is it Kodos?) got Marge Simpson pregnant... :)

Either way pretty crappy movie shamelessly cashing in on the Y2K scare, I'm glad I didn't pay to watch this stinker at a theater.

reply


okay, i'll take the bait...

how did the kangs (or the kodos) impregnate marge simpson?

It's mercy, compassion and forgiveness I lack. Not rationality...

reply

he sprayed her face with his seeds, which surprised (kinda disappointed) Marge who was resigned and expecting "something more" haha.

reply

See this is what I don't get. Because Satan is not portrayed as in a homosexual light, the movie is a sellout to homophobic masses. If he was portrayed as having sex with men, then it would be deemed as signifying that homosexuality is evil.

You need to stop putting hidden agendas and meanings to things that have none. Satan bones a few broads in the movie. There is nothing more to it than that. Don't like it, watch a different movie.

reply

regardless if he'd be straight, gay or bi...he needed to sleep with a woman to get what he wanted which was to birth a child.

reply

Satan SHOULD have visited the fertility clinic.

reply

You may have a point. Since it's a sin against God for another man to lie down with another man (homosexuality) Romans 1:24-28. And Satan is an anti-christ, he would probably would go both ways.

reply

Good luck living in the dark ages, lol

reply

In Medieval theology, angels were believed to be able to change genders at will.

Lucifer was a fallen angel.

http://ocdviewer.wordpress.com

reply

If we look at priests and such, Satan would be the opposite, so he likes young girls :P

reply

I KNEW IT! A movie about Arnold Schwarzenegger fighting evil forces to prevent the birth of the anti-Christ at the turn of the millenium while at the same time falling for and saving a woman who was chosen from birth to bear the child, and some laaaaame *beep* on IMDB was going to call someone homophobic.

Join me on my journey to Hollywood! - http://famous-elysium.blogspot.com/

reply

would have no morals

so your saying its wrong to be gay -& no one disagreed - cos it is wrong -i see

did you know 99 % of people are straight - y dont we foucs on something more interesting

reply

[deleted]