Satan is pretty much sold as a ladies man in End of Days, but I think that Satan would have no morals and fornicate with whichever sex he pleased..no matter which form he had taken
Is this just a mainstream sell out to placate the homophobic masses?
I think so.
Miss the entire point to the story much?
"Spock is the shiz-nit!"
Satan didn't only sleep with his intended mate in the film though.
We got a pointless sex scene with a mother and daughter for example. This is seemingly a Satan that is okay with breaking incest taboos but is pretty mainstream and traditional in what gender he likes.
Saddam is satan's boyfriend, DUH!
It is freee. . . http://cashcrate.com/1479712
[deleted]
[deleted]
As a spirit, does satan even have a gender? Satan promotes sin anyway.
shareSince the Devil as presented needs someone to bear his child around the time of the millenium, uh, he kind of HAS TO screw a woman on New Years Eve. If you really want everybody having all sorts of sex with either sex after the child is born in this scenario, then that is the only time you'll get unending fornication between all genders in all forms. After all, the new baby signifies hell on earth. After Hell is on the earth, you'll get whatever fornication you wish because there would be no rule and no law.
shareThe plot of the movie is not just Satan wanting to f^u^ck girls for the sake of that, but to procreate a children, so thats why he needs a woman and not a man for that.
share[deleted]
Your logic with animals is flawed, as homosexual behavior has been tracked in hundreds of different animals in hundreds of different species. There was a rise in homosexual behavior in siberian tigers, for example. Also certain species of chimpanzees and various monkeys actually commit acts of "penis-fencing."
Yet they reproduce easily.
[deleted]
You're wrong. Very. Firstly, homosexuality very definitely has been identified in animals. And secondly, it is believed that the genes that favor homosexuality in men may also be responsible for increasing fertility in females with the same gene. Which means if a woman has it she is likely to have more children than other women who don't, and if she passes it to a son he may be gay and is less likely to have no children but if she passes it to a daughter she'll be particularly fertile too and more likely to have children, and so it goes.
What if a squirrel wants a sausage?
[deleted]
You said they are "bisexual not fully homosexual". You're wrong. There are gay animals, and often they don't reproduce. Sometimes they even steal the offspring of heterosexual animals and raise them as their own.
What I said was simply the passing on of theories by researchers in the field right now. If you think you know better you should give them a call.
What if a squirrel wants a sausage?
[deleted]
Proof of what?
I did read the thread. You were saying that homosexuality would be a problem for animals because they wouldn't reproduce. The other poster was saying there are homosexual animals and those species still reproduce. He's right. No one is talking about individual animals. Except maybe you, but you keep referring to a species in its entirety and since there is no danger of all tigers being gay, I'm not sure what your point is.
What if a squirrel wants a sausage?
No he is right, if an animal (not human) is fully homo, it will die out...There are extreme exceptions to this rule as there are species that have the ability to change sex..If we did not know how to artificially inseminate, and we were all queer, we too would die out....
You Have a Hard Lip, Herbert..
Better Living Thru Chemistry
No, he's not right. I'm pretty certain the guy was talking about individual animals and not whole species. It wouldn't make sense to call a species bisexual when in fact they are largely heterosexual. He was saying that when homosexual activity is recorded in other species the individual animals engaging in homosexual relations are bisexual and not homosexual. That isn't even remotely true. Certain animals will choose only same sex partners despite the availability of normal hetero relationships. No one is saying the entire species is gay, and I really don't know where you got that from.
The other point I was making was that homosexuality at this point is believed to be passed on in males through the mother. Women who are genetically more fertile than average tend to be more likely to produce gay offspring. This is still speculative rather than hard science at the moment, but it goes to show how much more complicated things are than people realize. If the theory is true then it means that there would always be gay people but they would always be a minority.
What if a squirrel wants a sausage?
I thought we were talking about whole species of animals..If not then I misunderstood the post....
You Have a Hard Lip, Herbert..
Better Living Thru Chemistry
I completely "get" that he needs to procreate with a woman and produce a child.
He has many dalliances previous to the conception time. During these escapades it would have been fitting to have orgies with both men and women.
Maybe he needs to practice so he is sure to get it done right when it's time to do the deed...
share