Has held up very well over 17 years.
Saw this movie again this weekend. Last viewing was in 1999. The movie has held up remarkably well and was even better than I remembered.
shareSaw this movie again this weekend. Last viewing was in 1999. The movie has held up remarkably well and was even better than I remembered.
shareThe movie has held up remarkably wellI agree. It's also somehow...inoffensive? That's not quite the right word, but I've had it on in the background a lot lately, it's been playing on cable so much. It seems to be Jude Law movies -
it gets better in the details with every brief viewing. Even without watching out the whole thing, it just gets better. Anthony Mangella was responsible for this brilliance and every move. it's really bittersweet. I don't know if we'll ever see movies like this again.
shareFYI: To "amountpastdue" --
I believe another IMDb poster attempted to correct you on the spelling of g ge Director's name. It is NOT Mangella --- It is MINGHELLA. It's listed right on the IMDb
You seem to be currently posting quite often about this Director and the film. So, if you are truly interested in commenting on
him, PLEASE at least spell
the guy's name correctly --
out of respect for the dead!
And, I mean that with the greatest respect for Minghella.
Agreed.
shareIt's gotten better but that's not surprising; Anthony Minghella was a genius.
shareAgree just watched it again tonight and wow it really does hold up perfectly. Always forget how damn great it is. Doesn't feel dated at all
shareI agree. It is a classic just like Deliverance, Godfather 1 & 2 and I like The Last of the Mohicans 1993.
I think it helps the fact that's a period piece set in Europe so it has an air of timelessness or other worldliness. I think what dates the movie is how young and skinny Matt Damon looks...
share