I'm with you. What a load of nonsense.
1. Its very concept.
Neo has dysphoria. loooooool. Where to even begin unpacking this wild claim.
2. Neo entering the real world and ditching his deadname.
Birth. So it's nothing to do with it being a rip off of GITS? Deadnaming. Of course the agents aren't going to acknowledge Neo as anything other than Mr. Anderson as he's just just a glitch in their system.
3. The red pill.
Estrogen may well have been a "chocolatey maroon colour". So why not make the pill that colour then? Instead they choose a bright, vivid red pill. You know, as it pops on screen and looks good. They had to pick two colours so why not pick two primaries.
4. Switch was supposed to be presented as trans.
Well this is just JK Rowling style ret-conning. If it was so important, why not go through with her being a woman when in the Matrix? Probably because it wouldn't have made sense. And you just have to love Netflix's reply to anyone that dares criticize this claim “Who are you to tell not only a creator, but also a trans person, what was or wasn’t present in their minds while making their own film?” What relevance is it if they are trans? Who is Netflix to criticize someone if they just don't believe a film maker making claims about something 20 years after the fact? Conveniently when a new film is coming out...
5. Bullet time.
Bullet time "represented the trans experience". Ahahahaha. What? It's a cool effect. End of.
6. It was spelled out for us all along.
Zooming in between the letters M and F. Yeah, because no films have ever zoomed into the centre of the screen before...
And if you think even for one second that disagreeing that The Matrix is a "trans-allergory" is transphobic, you are simply wrong. Just because someone thinks they're a different gender to what they were born as, doesn't shield them from criticism, nor does it mean any criticism is due to their trans status.
reply
share