Massive Flop
I really liked this film,I was surprised to read that it lost $34.5 million. wtf happened there??
shareI really liked this film,I was surprised to read that it lost $34.5 million. wtf happened there??
shareStory of Andy Kaufman doesn't sell? Not a big surprise, actually. Andy was an eccentric guy, and his act wasn't for everyone. If Andy had to choose between being a mainstream success and being true to who he was; well we know which one he would have chosen.
shareHaving watched and enjoyed the episodes of Taxi with Andy Kaufman as Latka I was intrigued when Man on the Moon came out.
But the film, if one is to accept it as a kind of biography on Kaufman, basically revealed him to be a ginormous azz hole.
I didn't mind Kaufman's eccentric behavior or his bizzare comedy style. I think that was just the way he did his act. But the crap he would pull on his own family - pretending to be dying and whatnot, that was just too much. In the film his own family had gotten fed up with his antics and were leary of any new sob story Kaufman came up with. When told of his "death" or "illness" you can see they were just so exhausted with him already.
This whole notion that tricking people can be funny only carries you so far. Sooner or later you're gonna piss people off. And you're gonna piss people off even more when your comedy routine is as lame as Kaufman's evidently was.
The more I watched the film the more I thought that Kaufman might have been suffering from some mental defect.
It seems that he had this idea of what he thought was "funny", and he was so totally convinced that it was "funny" that nobody could get him to see just how unfunny he actually was. On practical application his comedy routines were mostly flacid. Original? I guess. Offbeat humor? Most definitely. But was it really funny..? I guess that depends on who you ask.
His ideas of staged antics during interviews could be very funny if executed well. But Kaufman didn't.
The idea of wrestling females by pretending (or not pretending) to be some chauvanist I can also see as being funny if executed well. And here again Kaufman didn't.
Someone also mentioned Kaufman's ability to command some influence with certain tv shows with incredulity. That I totally agree with. I don't see how it was even possible for someone like Kaufman to get away with some of the crap and cheap theatrics he did. But whatever...
The parts of the film I thought that were really moving was the close friendship between Danny DeVito and Kaufman. It comes through very clearly that these two were such good friends and colleagues. This film might have been a love letter to the late Kaufman by his friends. For that reason alone I would say the film does a nice job at providing an inside look into Kaufman.
This film is for his friends. And that's it. Anybody else is basically outside looking in like someone on this message board already stated.
I had no idea the movie lost so much money. I wonder if the director and actors were paid very high salaries. I am surprised that information is not listed on imdb.
shareI was so shocked to read the losses also.
shareIt made more money than the Lenny Bruce movie...
shareMy theory is that Carrey came from huge hits. Ace Ventura, The Mask, Dumb & Dumber, Liar Liar... all a certain kind of comedy in a very short spot of time.
He made Truman after that and people thought it would be the same kind of comedy and character. It wasn't. Many got dissapointed and didn't give a chance to Man On The Moon right away.
I must say, I didn't know Kaufman at the time, so... maybe I'm completely wrong.
I would agree with that.
He did appear in one or two disaster in that period (Batman Forever, AV2.... even to a extent Cableguy.....)
I remember not liking Man on the Moon and Truman at first (as it was just not Carrey to me), but both over the years have really grown on me, and after these he got back on track with Me, Myself and Irene & Bruce Almighty etc.... but last decade or so he has lost his way and very little on his CV since 2000-ish I care for (Suspect Dumb and Dumber 2 is one last shot at trying to get the old magic back).
I liked it because I remember a lot of Andy Kaufman's stuff and I like Carrey as well, but it's obvious the movie wouldn't have mass appeal.
Andy Kaufman was a comic's comic, either deconstructing comedy or just making fun of the audience. It's hard to explain what he was trying to do.
Agreed! Carrey at his best. . . obviously a passionate project for everyone and not a potential "blockbuster". Before this, I didn't much care fr Carrey's juvenile male humor. he he channels Kaufman and renders a brilliant and enigmatic performance. Too bad it lost money (hopefully it made it up later) because it's a brilliant homage! Andy, alive or dead, smiles on this! And most of us only knew "Taxi". I think trying to figure out Andy is akin to trying to deconstruct a poem. It's not ultimately not helpful, and detracts from the real meaning.
From thenumbers.com-
Production budget $52,000,000
Domestic box office: $34.5 mil
International box office: $12.8 million
It must have some dvd revenue, but I can't find it.
Not a flop.
Think a number of things are at fault.
Firstly Kaufman had been dead for something like 15 years, and even when he was alive, I get the feeling his act was not to everyones taste. Also I live in the UK, and had no idea who Andy Kaufman was at the time (I knew he was in Taxi, and struck me as odd as to why this guy deserved a movie).
Also I think word of mouth harmed it..... at the time anything Carrey was in was a automatic hit (granted one or two disasters in there, but nothing career threatening), and early reviews were rather than Carrey being his usual self, this was just Carrey being Kaufman (personally I think this is Carrey giving the performance of his carrer, but to a lot of people it was just Carrey copying Kaufman).
And another factor was its release..... 1999 is a epic year for movies (look on those "so-and-so greatest movies of all time" lists, and there is at least 10 movies from 1999 alone on them......) this movie just got lost in all that (some other good movies were made that year which failed to make any great noises)