MovieChat Forums > Lethal Weapon 4 (1998) Discussion > Lethal Weapon 4: Is It The Weakest In Th...

Lethal Weapon 4: Is It The Weakest In The Series?

posted 2 years ago by TMC-4 (20150)
1 reply | jump to latest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iRw68kMimg

After the success of LETHAL WEAPON 3, it was a given there would be a LETHAL WEAPON 4. But the next sequel proved to be surprisingly difficult to get into production. Until Warner Bros. realized they were heading into 1998 without a surefire summer hit on their hands. They gave LETHAL WEAPON 4 the greenlight and the movie was thrown together in a mad scramble. Twenty-five years later, it’s time to look back at the results of that rush job in this episode of REVISITED.

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/10hy2pr/why_did_lethal_weapon_4_get_such_bad_reviews_at/

[–] rateater (10032) a year ago

it has great villains in my opinion. which some people felt part 3 had terrible villains.

they shouldn't have waited that long. 94-96 would have been better. times were already changing.

it's great to be able to catch up with riggs and murtaugh again after the original trilogy. i was definitely left wanting more after part 3.

some of the action films were excellent. the boat shootout stuff near the beginning, the chinatown chase and action, the final fight at the end.

everyone is back. basically the whole cast. an amazing feet.

they look so well groomed and fashionable in the movie that it feels like they still fit right in with the modern world of today.