MovieChat Forums > Eyes Wide Shut (1999) Discussion > Naked Kidman is the only reason to watch...

Naked Kidman is the only reason to watch

posted a year ago by jk90us (8243)
9 replies | jump to latest

But that’s a damn good reason.

reply

[–] BKB (11305) a year ago

She has a great body, nice breasts.. The rest of the movie is pretty dull and feels like the only reason Tom Cruise was Cast was to prove to moviegoers at the time that he wasn't Gay..

reply

[–] daredevil1 (241) a year ago

Her acting is absolutely terrible, and she's not even in it that much. Not only could anybody have played her role, most anyone else would've been an improvement.

reply

[–] jk90us (8243) a year ago

Yes but she was A list at the time so she brought clout to the production.

reply

[–] Gd5150 (11965) a year ago

Nah, the party scene with all the weirdos in masks needs to be seen by everyone so they can understand what controls our political system.

reply

[–] Chickenfeet69 (103) a year ago

Who controls our political system? Guys in masks, and cloaks?

reply

[–] jk90us (8243) a year ago

I’d rather a naked Kidman did.

reply

[–] fc31 (6122) a year ago

But there are so many naked women in this movie, it is like a buffet of women.

You only see one?

reply

[–] jk90us (8243) a year ago

I prefer the ones I know vs. generic extras.

reply

[–] Melton (5571) a year ago

Nakidman is a bonus in an already great film.

reply