Only men getting killed in boardroom scene=bull**** feminist Dogma
by Sheldonshells» Sun Jan 29 2012 02:02:57
IMDb member since July 2006
Post Edited:Thu Nov 15 2012 12:06:09
Anyone else annoyed that all the men were killed in the boardroom and only the oh holier-than-thou, infallible, fallen to earth angel female was the one that lived?
They didn't particularly encounter too many "female" angels
Not to mention the VERY OBVIOUS angels have no real gender.
Gender is required to procreate.
God as God needs no real gender because God wills things into existance such as the baby inside Bethany. Realistically God as God can be whatgever God wants-a butterfly one minute, a Giraffe the next. For all anyone knows if there is a God, it changes shape as it feels & gender is only for those lesser creatures which cannot will future generations of themselves into existence.
I've seen arguments the God would appear to peopel in whatever form the viewer believes. For Bethany & the Muse, it took on a female form friendlier/more compatriot to their perceptions. Had they not been there, God might have appeared as a male.
Happy now?
Feminist DOGMA, anyone?
Not really.
Bartleby, Loki, & Metranon were genderless. Angels would likely appear in whatever form required to do the job.
What's even more ratbastardly sickening is how most of the men killed were for reasons involving harming, but not even violently harming, women. *vomits* What kind of abhorrent gender feminist propaganda delusion is this self-hating fool Kevin Smith guy (who has ONE good movie to his name I might add, that being Clerks, maybe Clerks II) infected with?
While pushing your male pity party agenda, you do realize that was a spoof on the male-dominated film industry. Walt Disney, etc?
How many women have headed Disney over the decades?
How many women have headed up ABC, 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers.......?
Get it now?
The hypocrisy of their putting out "family friendly" fare while being anything but the family types they are trying to sell their pap to.
Funny that ten years+ on justice department and FBI stats, Centers for Disease Control, the American Journal of Public Health, and many other reports, stats, and studies show women physically abuse and murder their children more
And who is with the little darlings the most?
Think they get on your nerves?
(and often get away with doing that, as well as murdering adults, as I'm sure you've all by now at least witnessed in the news more than a few times),
not near as much byt he stats I've seen.
[/quote] abuse their spouses and partners more, even female sex abusers are on the rise, females committing violence/assault is on the rise, women cheating on their men almost if not as much as men (despite recent sensationalist media spotlighting on celebrity male philanderers) tend to attract. I wonder if he could still get away with that kind of propaganda today. [/quote]
Yeah, poor baby.
Your 5 ft tall 100 lb girlfriend do that much damage to you?
Sad little boy.
Smitty seems to have a bad self-hating male streak and some extremely misguided ideas about men and women. This dungheap should be pelted, not with cigarettes (ha ha), but with rotten fruit for his self-defeating promotion of misandry and sexism towards men.
It's religious.
It's CATHOLIC religious.
A religion which is STILL refusing to allow women to be equal/priests.
Sorry. They've made their bed.
Well that's enough ranting for now. Any thoughts from men or women out there in IMDb land? And please, preferably not from gender/ideological feminist women or men, or men who aren't walked all over, self-hating chumps with no dignity or self-respect (which feminist agitprop movies like these more than likely contributed to making)?
Did you know originally God was a hermaphrodite?
Earliest Jewish scripture had all good coming from His wonderful, kind MALE side (as in the father proud of his son) & all evil came from Her violent, angry side (as in the mother punishing her child for no reason. Forget there is a Jewish proverb that one should punish one's child every day because the child knows what it is for).
Satan was originally a function, a job, like District Attorney who tested mankind's loyalty to God. Why do you think God has such a casual conversation with him in the story of Job? Don't you think if God's Great Enemy walked into His Presense, God would order Satan destroyed by any one of the hosts of angels likely surrounding God at the time? It was only after Jews were exposed to the Zoroastrian concept of an evil deity that Satan became evil. Satan is mentioned less than a dozen times in the Old Testiment (something like 6 I believe), yet over 300 times in the New Testiment. Because of Zoroastrians.
Lucifer, son of the Morning is the fricken King of Babylon. It says so in the scripture-that the person is to go speak this parable to the King of Babylo-Oh Lucifer, son of the Morning, etc.
The word Lucifer is taken from the Latin Vulgate, which translates הֵילֵל as lucifer,[Isa. 14:12]meaning "the morning star, the planet Venus", or, as an adjective, "light-bringing".
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid. -Benjamin Franklin
reply
share
Sheldonshells
10 years ago
While pushing your male pity party agenda, you do realize that was a spoof on the male-dominated film industry. Walt Disney, etc?
How many women have headed Disney over the decades?
How many women have headed up ABC, 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers.......?
Get it now?
I'm not pushing any male pity agenda. And the next line of BS you bring up in the above quote has already been addressed by me in an earlier post I made so I'm not gonna waste TOO MUCH time on it but I'll just add this:
Do you really think that men at the head and in the head offices of those corporations really says anything about the alleged prviilege and power of all the other everyday men in society? Do you think that this small minority of powerful men in high ranks at these companies, who were probably more than likely already born into upper middle/upper class families (*economic status and class is a far greater indicator of power/status than one's gender, please take note of this if of nothing else), somehow means that all men are in one big back-slapping boys club against women? If you even thnk that for a second then I seriously think you need your head examined--but hopefully not by a feminist indoctrinated psychiatrist.
Yeah, poor baby.
Your 5 ft tall 100 lb girlfriend do that much damage to you?
Sad little boy.
Sorry, but you're ignorant. Size is just one among many factors. A smaller woman can always pick up a variety of implements to use as a weapon and to make up for her smaller size. She hits you over the head with something like that and it can seriously injure or kill you. All the working out in the world would not build any more muscle or defence for your head, and men don't have thicker craniums than women on average. So there's no difference at all when it comes to smashing a hammer or a frying pan down on it, get it yet? They can also use element of surprise (like do somthing to a man in his sleep) or poison him, or hire a contract killer, etc. The domestic violence studies I alluded to all factored in these forms of violence and proxy violence and when they did it turned out women were MORE abusive. I'm a sad little boy? Pffff, you got a sad little brain, a brain which reduces all kinds of abuse and violence down to simply fisticuffs and who has the bigger biceps as if that's the end all and be all of it.
All the other junk you brought up in your post is just irrelevant and insignificant.
reply
share