This is one of the more ludicrous things I've ever read on this website. Your assessment that the movie's failure at the (domestic) box office was because "...the music score was louder than the characters [sic] dialogue" is...insane. For the very basest of arguments, I offer this: It's quite a popular opinion that last summer's Christopher Nolan feature "Interstellar" had rather the same problem: the music at times overpowered most everything - including dialogue. Well, that movie did alright, making $671 million worldwide, so your idea that a (professional) movie's (professional) sound-mix can affect it's box office success is at BEST] un...sound?
Also, it's apparent you're not a music fan, so I don't hold this against you, but saying "...the music should have slightly lower key [sic]" is way, way off. The music's key is a completely different concept than the music's volume...Key having to do with note. As in, on a piano, each key is a different note - a musical piece's key being the root note of the composition. You follow? The music's volume in this movie's case is just...well, how loud the recorded music was mixed into the film.
I myself found no problems with the music's mix in the movie, though I'm basing this from the movie's Blu-ray release, and who knows, maybe they fixed any problems with the mix here. Hell, I found no fault in "Interstellar's" rather bold mix, for that matter; the music was LOUD, to be sure, but the whole experience worked. At least for me.
That's all! Have a good day.
X B. Cross X
reply
share