... given how the Judge realized or even suspected that his cough was so bad that it COMPLETELY prevented him from speaking and saying what he needed to say during that case (if it wasn't say Pacino's character's supernatural powers at work here), instead of simply stating "For God's sake man" and somehow stopping the court procedure...
Couldn't the judge maybe get that man to WRITE DOWN what he needed to say or even get say HIS lawyer or member of the jury to say what he needed and then afterwards, if his cough really is so non-stop and suspicious, get him a glass of water or even call a doctor or something for him?
And even if courts did have certain rules and whatnot and that minor details like this could affect the outcome, given how law and rules were created by humans, surely there could be exceptions and contingency plans around if during a court case someone was feeling ill and unable to speak and that, a bit like if someone is deaf for instance (see also that Cher 1980s flick "Suspect" from 1985 I believe) - they could get the person to write it down rather than just letting them get carried away with a cough and totally prevent an important or otherwise piece of information from getting passed on etc.
Besides, in real life (well...), how often or even does it at all happen when during a court case, someone, a member of the Jury etc, may have an important piece of information to say but let's say they develop either a headache, or a coma, or a cough like in this case that is so bad it prevents them from communicating (and who knows if maybe that person's drink in advance was spiked or something?) or something else, and the Judge and people around probably realize the person is unwell and maybe someone did do it deliberately to prevent them from speaking the truth, or maybe something else happens but it prevents the person from giving out necessary information...
Does something get done in the process to either help that person or help the court case? And couldn't someone in the jury present a pen and paper to that person and state - "OK, maybe you can't talk for now, would you like to write it down instead" or maybe even that man with a cough could do a sign gesture and show by hands that he wants to write it down.
Or was that man, besides his horrific cough (though it wasn't spelled out to be as such) under possibly Pacino's supernatural spell and was probably prevented that way from using body language period?
Not an answer to your query exactly (I don’t think?) but a slight honing in of the detail in this case…It was the defendants voodoo curse with the severed tongue and nails that disabled the prosecutor from speaking freely in the court room. Surrealism’s sake. As in- we would allow this behavior in a courtroom in this context b/c even the judge in the scene isn’t acting realistically. The voodoo spell is on that man’s “tongue” metaphorically and no one will “hear” him no matter what he does.
Just this, a little off topic but, on some occasions, even myself once or twice, in real life, I saw people collapse and faint for similarly non-important reasons in life, and the people around didn't just shrug the situation off with a "For God's sake" remark and just let the matter roll and leave everyone to their own devices but took often strong effort to provide help to the affected party.
And I wondered why in this film during that coughing scene no similar effort was made.
Heck, we even had some people try and provide help to others when they were COUGHING as well one way or another.
And if there was a trial, we would either get them to write down what they needed to say or give a glass of water or a medical assistance if we feel they are so bad that they either can't communicate important information or look like they're gonna develop at the very least a serious illness if no help gets provided.
And I bet that even if it WAS the voodoo spell, given who he was, Pacino's character at least helped to propel it, just as at one point, he was able to be in both places at once and project his own image in that court room.
Yes, I definitely agree. I totally think the voodoo practitioner AND Al Pacino’s devil were BOTH helping to propel that spell over the court room. Yup, I felt like all evil was being buoyed by Pacino’s character in some way.
Let me first say that I love this move and I've seen it many times. OK, having said that, I understand your point totally. I have always felt that the judge's reaction was not only inappropriate, but very unrealistic to an attorney in his court room having a coughing fit which was, obviously, beyond his control. The only thing I can think of, aside from bad writing, was that the curse somehow affected the judge and made him completely unsympathetic toward the attorney. In terms of the attorney putting something in writing, I'm not sure he could at that moment since the curse was making him cough so badly. In reality, if that would have in a court room, there would be a recess until the coughing attorney composed himself and was ready to resume.
Yes, I def agree with both of you guys regarding the judges unrealistic behavior in the courtroom scene. Crazy that he would say “good god man!” when the attorney is over there unable to speak due to an uncontrollable coughing fit. Lol. It actually made me laugh a little at how absurd it was. Yes, def unrealistic.. that’s why I personally chalked it up to the fact that the voodoo curse effected every one on some level. It’s a stretch, I guess, but one has to fill in those blanks that way so we can attempt to just go with the movie as we want to. It’s a campy enough of a movie that a scene like that wasn’t so incongruous overall, you know what I mean? While this movie is campy and an over the top sort of ride, it also manages to lay down a lot of sharp commentary on society.