MovieChat Forums > Deconstructing Harry (1998) Discussion > What gargage

What gargage

posted 22 years ago by bouncingoffwall
16 replies | jump to latest

I enjoy Woody Allen films, as a whole, and rented this one thinking it would be a nice treat. I was wrong. I found the film to be crude and humorless. When it got to the part where the Demi Moore character was thanking God for the blow job she was about to give Harry, I realized the movie had reached a dead-end.
So I turned it off.

Woody: raunchy is one thing; trash is another. You wasted your time on the latter here. I give this film a 1 because I can't give it less. Can't believe this came from the same mind that gave us Manhattan and Annie Hall, and Mighty Aphrodite, to name just three.

Everyone else: Save your money and see just about anything else.

[–] flickfiend 19 years ago

What is "gargage"?

That is a question for the ages.

An existential thorn in one's side?

Nah!

__________________________________________________________________________
"There is no such thing as coincidence, just the illusion of coincidence."

[–] ninjaalex 19 years ago

The humour was very funny; yes in places it was crude but thats half the appeal. In his other works there has been crude or albeit more subtley done crude humour. But, at the end of the day I can't respect a man's opinion when he mispells garbage.

[–] clockwork_orange2001 19 years ago

I must admit when I first watched it I was a little disappointed, primarily because I had big expectations. The film definitely had brilliant moments and weak ones. All in all, I thought this was one of Woody's better films of the 90s. This film did seem to have an awful lot of profanity.

"I think that silent films got a lot more things right than talkies." --Stanley Kubrick

[–] 19 years ago

[deleted]