MovieChat Forums > Boogie Nights (1997) Discussion > Burt Reynolds Was Great In This -- Even ...

Burt Reynolds Was Great In This -- Even If He Hated It


The success of Paul Thomas Anderson (PTA) with making Boogie Nights at the young age of 26 got him "the biggest star in the business" one movie later -- Tom Cruise -- to appear in the ensemble cast of Magnolia.

PTA couldn't land anyone that major for Boogie Nights -- but he landed someone who HAD been that major. Burt Reynolds.

Reynolds had evidently been the Number One Movie star in the world during the late 70's and early 80s. He had the classic Deliverance on his resume, and the hit The Longest Yard, and the blockbuster Smokey and the Bandit. But he rather frittered it all away in the early 80's on a string of really silly, lousy movies like Canonball Run II and Smoker Ace. Add in some health problems, and by the 90s, Burt was over.

But still a name. And in Boogie Nights, he proved why he'd been so big to begin with./

There are a lot of good actors in Boogie Nights -- many at the beginning of their careers(Philllip Seymour Hoffman) some a ways in(William H. Macy.) And Mark Wahlberg was shooting for stardom.

But Burt WAS a star. Had been, at least. And his edgy charmisma makes him the planet around which all the other characters (and actors) orbit.

Reynolds famously hated Boogie Nights while he was making it, and fired his agent over having accepted it. And then he got the only Oscar nomination of his career. Supporting, though(as Cruise would be nominated for Magnolia.) Robin Williams beat Reynolds (For Oscar Bait Good Will Hunting) and Reynolds looked visibly peeved in the Oscar audience(well, maybe I imagined it.)

No matter. Its the work on the screen that matter. And Burt is the center of Boogie Nights.

He's a few years past the brawny muscular stud of Deliverance, well a couple of decades, actually. His hair is white -- including the frosting of big hair on top of his head that is really one of his hairpieces. The black and white beard and moustache -- and big swirling eyebrows -- give Burt a slightly Satanic look -- he's a smiling devil luring Wahlberg into a promised life of sex and wealth..but at what cost.

Burt's life of physical roles seems to have taken a toll. He moves in Boogie Nights with the aching stiffness of a football player whose tacklings have rendered walking a hard, painful thing to do.

But for all of Burt's frailty and age in the role, the authority he had -- and lost -- comes back in Boogie Nights. He always had a great voice -- deep and commanding and sexy -- and he doesn't do his high pitched goofy laugh here. Jack Horner is a tough man working in a very tough world -- making porn films with damaged people under the supervision of the Mafia.

Burt is clearly the "daddy" of his family of misfits -- sex workers who can barely function off stage.

But I think, in the end, the truly fascinating thing about Jack Horner and Reynolds' portrayal of him is that this macho, authoritative, supremely manipulative man proves to be: utterly delusional.

I mean, he thinks he is making "great films." He looks at a few completed reels with dramatics that look like a really bad Super 8 junior high production(the bad acting, the lousy sets, the terrible fight choreography) and it becomes clear: when nobody is having sex in Jack's movies, they are REALLY lousy movies. They aren't really movies. But Jack thinks they are. He sees classic work where the rest of us see schlock.

Jack Horner's delusion about the "movies" he makes (and tries to protect against the coming 80's video tape era) is the weird key to the character. In all other ways, he projects -- or tries to project -- a normality, and a professionalism about his work. But when we see how seriously he takes his ridiculously acted and written films, we get it: he's nuts. He is an insane man leading a group of broken people.

Speaking with authority, Jack Horner says that he is a film director who wants to make a porn movie where "the viewers sticks around to see how the story ends." But THAT goal is delusion, too.

Its almost cartoonish. One wonders if ANY porn director EVER saw his films as true art, or even competent Super 8/16 mm filmmaking.

Meanwhile, back at the porn: I would suspect that one reason Burt Reynolds hated his role in Boogie NIghts is because of all the "dirty talk" he had to say about the mechanics of sex films. A Number One Movie Star NEVER would have said language like that back in the day(though Paul Newman came close, in the hockey film Slapshot.) . But of course, Burt wasn't Number One anymore when he made Boogie Nights.

Anyway, with the courage and dedication of a acting professional who accepted a part and decided to do it well, Burt Reynolds says all those dirty words in Boogie Nights, and sells them -- and rather shocks us. I can't picture Robert Redford talking like that.

CONT

reply

Totally agreed. He should have won an Oscar for his performance. Unfortunately it was a bad year to be nominated in that category. RObin WIlliams pulls off a performance for the ages in "Good Will Hunting" and gets the Oscar. I don't think anyone begrudges that but it still shouldn't lessen what Reynolds did in "Boogie NIghts". He was fantastic.

reply

I was adding additional posts when yours came in.

Glad to see you agree.

It was a much more daring performance than what Williams(certainly good enough) did in Good Will Hunting. A classic GOOD group of nominees at the Oscars that time. Hard to choose.

Williams' end was tragic, but something tells me that Burt Reynolds probably was really bugged having to lose to "Mork" that night.

reply

Of course! Reynolds was never nominated before or since. Well until he passed I mean. I read a bit of your initial comment and it's true, Reynolds went up and down in his career. He was HUGE for about 5 years (78-82) - then quickly faded away. A lot of that was bad choices in roles, but it was also because people thought he had AIDS. In fact he didn't. He had lost a ton of weight after breaking his jaw in the movie he did with CLint Eastwood - "City Heat" if I remember correctly. Anyway, he had disappeared by the late 80s - then came back on TV in the early 90s with "Evening SHade". A win for "Boogie Nights" would have been a nice cherry on top of his long career. It was just the wrong year to be nominated. You could have went with either guy (as the winner I mean) and I don't think anyone would have been upset.

reply

I thought it was Nicholson for “As Good As It Gets”.

reply

Reynolds real-life seething rage (which came out in bitter interviews about how Pacino and DeNiro and Nicholson got all the Oscar love he deserved) pokes through in Jack Horner as well. Jack's probably got a fair amount of self-loathing about what he does for a living -- we don't know his roots, but we can guess he WAS a male porn star. (nterestingly , we never see him have sex either with live-in "Mama Bear" porn star Julianne Moore or his other female proteges -- maybe Jack's beyond sex now.

And that rage comes out -- with the great force Burt Reynolds was capable of on screen -- when Mark Wahlberg starts yelling at him by the swimming pool in front of other people and gets fired for his trouble.

Rumor has it that Burt Reynolds was REALLY that raging and angry when it came time to film that scene -- and he took it out on "kid" director PTA. In one of his autobios, Reynolds wrote about how much he loved and respected "old time tough guy directors" like Robert Aldrich ("I miss him every day," wrote Reynolds of Aldrich's death.) Conversely, Reynolds said he HATED "these young film school brats who think they know everything" and he saw PTA to be exactly that kind. Oh, well, their backstage fights gave us very realistic rage on screen.

Amusing: evidently despite their fights on Boogie Nights, once Oscar came calling, PTA offered Reynolds a role in Magnolia. Reynolds said no, and later told an interviewer "I made my Paul Thomas Anderson movie and one was enough."

I wonder what Magnolia role Reynolds was offered?

Tom Cruise's?

Nah. Maybe the Philip Baker Hall role -- the game show host.

I guess we will never know.

But we DO know that Reynolds was great in Boogie Nights...and reclaimed some of the movie star authority he had lost.

reply

Burt was pretty good in this film but his best performance will always be 'Lewis' from the movie Deliverance.

reply

This is why it's good always to be professional. Reynolds still put in a fine performance despite not liking the movie.

Looking at Reynolds career, he had pretty bad taste. Once he was one of the biggest stars in the world and had his pick of projects, he usually went with dopey low brow action/comedy movies like Gator and Stroker Ace.

reply

This is why it's good always to be professional. Reynolds still put in a fine performance despite not liking the movie.

---

Yes. Its true with a lot of them. One reads about co-stars hating each other but showing up to do scenes together as lovers or the best of friends. "Its the job to fake it and make us believe it." Reynolds was professional in Boogie Nights and ...his one Oscar nomination. Moreover, he made us BELIEVE in the messed-up, half-insane character he played.

One actor who could NOT keep his contempt under control for the movie he was in was Peter Sellers in the Bond spoof "Casino Royale"(1967). Sellers was late to set, fought with other players(notably Orson Welles), screwed up his line readings on purpose...finally the producers simply fired him and patched together some footage with a body double and killed his character off 2/3 through the movie!

I found another quote from Reynolds as to why he disliked his Boogie Nights character -- "I don't like men who have no respect for women." So he really hated this man he was playing.

---

Looking at Reynolds career, he had pretty bad taste. Once he was one of the biggest stars in the world and had his pick of projects, he usually went with dopey low brow action/comedy movies like Gator and Stroker Ace.

---

Its a fascinating study in destroying one's own career. When you look it over, after years in TV series and B-movies, Reynolds "exploded" as a serious actor in the VERY serious "Deliverance" of 1972, then acted in a lot of stuff before getting a major entertainment hit in "The Longest Yard," then acted in a lot of stuff before getting his blockbuster -- Smokey and the Bandit. Those three are the keys to his career. Most of the rest of the movies he did "Just OK" -- Shamus, Fuzz, The Man Who Loved Cat Dancing, WW and the Dixie Dance Kings, the very ill-fated Lucky Lady(a shot at a big Xmas entertainment with Gene Hackman and Liza Minnelli.)

CONT

reply

But after Smokey hit so big, it got better -- but it also got worse.

Hooper was a hit about Hollywood stuntmen. He was Cary Grant-suave in Semi-Tough. And Burt tried a serious romantic comedy about divorce -- "Starting Over" -- that got some Oscar buzz.

But then he started choosing all those awful comedies with no real commitment on his part: Cannonball Run and Cannonball Run II, Smoker Ace....even Smokey and the Bandit 2 was terrible.

Reynolds noted wryly "I didn't become a star BECAUSE of my movies, I became a star IN SPITE OF my movies."

The 80's had a solid action hit in Sharkey's Machine(marred a bit by director Reynolds jokey approach to serious material) and a big musical hit(his final hit) in Best Little Whorehouse in Texas.

His biggest career mistake, said Burt, was turning down the "side role" in Terms of Endearment that won Jack Nicholson a Best Supporting Actor Oscar -- the part had been WRITTEN FOR Reynolds! It wasn't in the source novel.

The killer movie in more ways than one was "City Heat" opposite Clint Eastwood in 1984. The script wasn't very good and Eastwood (even fading a bit) was now clearly a bigger star than the failing Burt. And somebody hit Burt in the jaw with a real chair by accident during a fight scene, and he ended up with major health issues for the rest of the 80s and simply no major movies anymore. He did a failed TV detective show and a successfully TV comedy series(Evening Shade) and eventually ...Boogie Nights.

reply