Great film, but so many questions...
First of all, I thoroughly enjoyed this film. I'm not trashing it at all, but there seems to be a lot of questions that pop-up. Answers to any of these would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
1) Is Danny Snyder (Dustin Hoffman) "in" on the scam taking place, or does he just assume that King Benny is trying to protect the boys, and that's why he has given him a list of all the proper questions to be asked to ensure that Tommy and John will be found innocent?
2) Why is Michael so adamant about Danny being the defense lawyer? He says it's because Danny's something of a hack and a drunk, and that they need the situation to seem hopeless for Tommy and John. But wouldn't a really good lawyer be the better way to go? A better defense attorney would make the "not guilty" verdict seem much more plausible than a lousy alcoholic lawyer winning the case.
3) Fat Man and King Benny seem to know exactly what happened to the boys at Wilkinson (beatings, rape, etc.) I thought that the four of them had never told anyone, and that Father Bobby was the first person to be told the whole story. Not even Carol knew all of the details. Do Benny and Fat Man know about all the details, or are they just on board with defending John and Tommy because of the whole "neighborhood respect" angle?
4) How does Ralph Ferguson not remember Michael, Tommy, or John? I mean, if he didn't recognize their faces, which he probably wouldn't because their adults now, he must at least recognize their names. Especially considering that Michael is the prosecutor of the case. Ferguson must have heard his name mentioned somewhere, and thought it odd that Michael would be trying to put Tommy and John away.
5) Who is the father of Carol's baby? Is it one of the four guys, or not?