Warm, but unrealistic


I do enjoy this movie (when I'm not in a pregnant, crazy-hormone state!) but mostly because I adore the actors. There are definite problems with their storyline here:

1) Annie's career. There is no way an entry-level architect is either going to make enough money to be surrounded by half the stuff you see in this movie (though there is room to work with here...it's unknown what Brian would make) or be selected to a design team for something as huge as a Boston museum

2) Labor scenes - a little ridiculous. a) Annie did not have pain medication, but never screamed and told her Dad in the middle of a contraction to go ahead and go, she could handle it. b) Brian shows up at the last minute and an unmedicated Annie smiles and laughs and tells him she's so glad he made it? Hmm.....

3) Nina - Well, can I assume she had been given some sort of epidural to prepare her for her c-section? Her contractions miraculously stopped all the while George was telling her the story of their first date....


On the good side, Franck was hysterical as usual and the show really does give you a nice warm fuzzy. I can't believe they really tore down the house used as the Banks!


reply

Completely agree with #1 & 2. But I know from experience that if the baby was in distress, (which we know it was from the drop in heart rate), it is not uncommon for the mother to be given medications to slow the contractions. When I arrived at the hospital in labor with my twins, I was completely dilated, my water had broken, and my contractions were about 1 minute apart. The first twin was in breech position, making it necessary to have a c-section, however, my doctor was 30 minutes away. I was given 3 different medications to slow my labor, thus reducing the stress on the babies until the doctor arrived. It didn't stop my contractions, but it did reduce the frequency and intensity of them.

reply

I agree about this movie being unrealistic, with number 1 though, they did say in FOB that Bryan was independent because nobody could afford to hire him, so i'd say he makes a lot of money.

What i think is the most unrealistic aspect of the whole movie is how they supposedly run two successful companies, the shoe company George runs seems quite large, yet he never has any stress, working late etc. Both my husband and Dad run their own companies and work takes a HUGE part out of their lives, even if you have competent managers, you still have to oversee everything and work your a** off... he seems far too relaxed lol

reply

When did they tear the Banks house down? I drove by it just this past summer. It looked like they were doing repairs on the roof, but there was no indication that it would be torn down.

reply

Really? YAAAAY! Actually my husband told me that, I'm so glad he's wrong...I LOVE that house!

reply

Yeah. I drove by it again. Its still there. If you are ever in the Pasadena area it is on a street called El Molina. It is around a mile from the little town called San Marino where they were supposed to live in the film.

reply

Well, as far as her career goes I disagree...the first moveie was made in 1991, so there is a definite time span of 4 years or so. (Dian Keaton even looks way older in the second one!!!) So maybe she was with her firm for a few years. Just a guess!! :)

reply

I agree with you that Diane Keaton looks older, but in what way??
I mean, her face looks the same....

reply

Hi!
I dont' get your question...yes she DOES look older like everyone else does...I mean she does look younger in the first Father of the bride because they were filmed I think 3 years or so apart. she doesn't look like 20 miles of bad road she is still beautiful...but just naturally older..I think it;s her shorter hairstyle that does it. When you get right down to it they all looked older!LOL

reply

I mean, she's a little bit insane in the second one. I saw her crack up twice, but the directors obviously didn't see that Diane was laughing so much she could of died.
It was obvious that Diane was laughing in real life, not for the movie.

reply

"2) Labor scenes - a little ridiculous. a) Annie did not have pain medication, but never screamed and told her Dad in the middle of a contraction to go ahead and go, she could handle it."

Why ridiculous? I had four babies, two without medication and I never screamed. I could and did handle it. Many women do. I feel for those poor souls who have such painful labours they become very distressed, but this is by no means the case for every woman.

reply

A nice movie.

reply

There is somethings in this movie that aren't accurate. One the running back and forth to the hospital every time she thinks she is in labor. You don't go to the hospital until your contractions are a couple of minutes apart and have been doing that consistently for at least an hour. You also call the Doctor before and let him or her know what is going on. At the time the movie was made women didn't go to a delivery room to have their baby anymore. They deliver them in their room.

reply

The third point reminds me of something I felt never really added up. At one point the doctor (Megan) tells George that Nina's baby could possibly be born before Annie's and then the next thing, Nina is having an emergency caesarian. (I can only presume the baby supposedly was in distress suddenly because - if it hadn't been - surely it would have arrived before annie's with no problems.)

With the second point, I suppose everyone has a different pain tolerance. I heard somewhere that if women expect that labour will be painful, they feel pain more acutely. (I've never had kids but I'm a terrible needle-phobic and - bizarrely - I've always had this idea I'd put up with any amount of pain to avoid needles.)



"If we go on like this, you're going to turn into an Alsatian again."

reply

Just on the 2nd point, you can't make that assumption. We aren't TOLD if she has or doesn't any pain meds. She more that likely probably did, we just didn't see it. They can't show every single little move.

Salem

reply

Perhaps Annie had an epidural.

reply

[deleted]