MovieChat Forums > Dead Man Walking (1996) Discussion > "You're supposed to be human" - OK fair ...

"You're supposed to be human" - OK fair enough, but what does that entail?


In one of the responses here to a question of if we are supposed to feel sympathy for Poncelet or if we are to think he should die and we shall all be grateful for it, one of the responders answered with "you're supposed to be human" but put a full stop afterwards and didn't expand or explain.

And OK I do agree with you. But what does that mean, especially in this case? To be human? To think that Poncelet deserves to die for what he did or to think that perhaps, while he may deserve punishment including many years if not lifetime in prison, that even the killing of someone like him is STILL wrong? And how does either position make one human?

Also, we in life are often told and taught certain things. But we've had some otherwise good people at times speak very ill of criminal perpetrators like him and think that by rights yes they do deserve to die and that no sympathy should be shed. Others rightly spoke of what we can or cannot do. But then, are there no grey areas or exceptional circumstances in life and are we, as human beings, sometimes right?

And who is RIGHT here, overall? And basically, being a human in this case means what? And how does one balance the desire for vengeance and that of the right punishment?

Forgiving criminals and letting them go is bad. Killing them or being too harsh is also bad. So where and how do we find this balance to be human? Inquiring minds want to know. :)

P.S. And was the Sister one and was she fully right? Thanks. :)

reply

PLUS FOLKS...

Just go in today's day and age for any film that deals with revenge against particular group of vicious and evil and say criminally responsible for dastardly deeds especially men and see that there are MANY viewers out there who cheer their violent comeuppance mostly in a form of a painful death and think "those bastards deserve it" and no one so much as QUESTIONS them and people who do disagree happen to be or be put into category of ignorant (and mostly as such MEN) folks whose opinions they find offensively worthless.

So how, bearing that one, however small, or not, aspect in mind, are we supposed to, within such matters staring right at us, simply be human, and is it not wrong to be compassionate towards violent criminals as such?

reply

And does killing someone who is a rapist and a murderer REALLY make you "no better than them", like that? Aren't those individuals very bad and dangerous? Do they really deserve to live (even if hopefully punished by law)? Where is the line between heroism, justifiable homicide and just sinking down to their level even if you put them down? Who decides and who is right here?

And HOW COME if it really IS so bad and possible and people KNOW IT TOO, then law, which is supposed to be above them, still organized death penalty in the first place or is it just another example of humanity, and legal system created by human beings, being far from ideal?

And what if you kill them in self defense for example?

As much as I sort of understand where folks are coming from, the overall issue feels very frustrating to me and also, God forgive, but if I or my family were in any way victims of such matter, I may not know how to react and I will be too distressed to be "rational". And that would make me no better than they are or, for example, I would be ON THEIR LEVEL??!!??!!??!!????

In wars for instance lots of bad things happen, but in WW2 for example, the Russians were defending themselves against Nazi invaders and killed many of them in defense and they were branded as heroes. And no professional sources or even civilized people would dare claim that they in the process (other matters aside notwithstanding, then again, loads of things happened in such times) fell down to their level. And should we be against defense killings like that too? Or is it DIFFERENT, even if it still involves taking another life, or is there something fundamentally different about death penalty that sets it all aside? My God, law's not perfect but still...

reply