This movie feels like it should have been a bigger deal
Kirk and Picard team up and Kirk dies? Yet it basically is a footnote in the franchise. They must have really fucked it up
shareKirk and Picard team up and Kirk dies? Yet it basically is a footnote in the franchise. They must have really fucked it up
shareyeh the much anticipated crossover movie (Kirk meets Picard!), also the 1st TNG movie (essentially TNG The Motion Picture), and had the Enterprise D destruction, introduction never seen before Enterprise, time travel, klingons, Malcolm McDowell as the villain, just everything (culminating in the biggest event of all Trek - the death of Kirk).. The only thing really missing was of course the entire original cast (or spock & bones)
It should've been Star Treks Endgame but turned out more like Star Treks Eternals
when it came out in the cinema it was all the rage
share
At the end of the day (or is it millenium), viewers just don't like to watch their friends and heroes die. The Wrath of Khan is great but I never watch it because Spock dies (even though I know he comes back).
I don't watch The Search for Spock because Kirk gets Spock back but his son dies.
I don't watch Generations because Kirk dies.
I don't watch The Final Frontier because the whole movie dies.
As far as I'm concerned, "Generations" is easily the best of the Next Generation films and ranks with the best of the franchise. It was a big deal when released for Christmas, 1994 (or early 1995 most everywhere else), and very successful at the box office. While the next film, "First Contract," did even better at the box office, I prefer "Generations." "First Contact" is a crowd-pleaser (not that that's a bad thing necessarily) whereas "Generations" has more depth in the tradition of Roddenberry's original vision.
For instance, the concept of the Nexus is fascinating: No matter how much we want it, an illusory paradise is just that — an illusion. This concept and its implementation into the storyline is nothing short of brilliant. Who created the Nexus? Who else but the Talosians, the 'antagonists' of Trek's very first episode, "The Cage," a tale repeated in the Original Series’ only two-parter “The Menagerie."
There are several other highlights: The usual Trek humor, Data’s amusing experiences with the emotion chip, Malcolm McDowell’s outstanding performance as the mad Soran, his believable obsession and justifications, B’Etor & Lursa and the renegade Klingons, the startling obliteration of them and their vessel, the thrilling crash-landing of the Enterprise-D, the meeting of Kirk and Picard in the Nexus, the final showdown with Soran and Kirk’s death.
This “passing-of-the-torch” installment requires an attention span and an appreciation for high-concept sci-fi; it will bore to tears those for whom Star Trek means only neato spacecrafts and superficial space dogfights (not that there's anything wrong with that, lol). In addition, Generations has the gonads to make bold changes — killing off a major iconic character, and fairly prominent support characters as well, not to mention destroying the Enterprise-D.
As for the supposed plot holes some armchair critics whine about, they're actually pretty easily explained.
No
I would say the best generations film is First Contact & Nemesis after.
It did well at box office because it was hot straight after the end of tv show.
Nexus really doesn't make any sense neither does the poor story for the movie.
The movie started well with Ent-B but started to go silly when they was able to transport some of the people out that is when it started to make 0 sense on wards.
Easily explained ok if you say so many which cant be.
Explain how its claimed you cant get into Nexus via a ship because they get damaged/destroyed yet Kirk gets into it that way,
Explain how Klingons penetrate Ent-D shield dont target something important so ships fine but they dont change shield frequencies something they had to do for the Borg on regular basis so they allow themselfs to be hit multi times again when you look at locations none of them are major systems (Later on klingons are going to target bridge before they are hacked and destroyed)
Many others as well
My order for the TNG movies would be: Generations, Nemesis, First Contact, Insurrections.
I find the Nexus a brilliant sci-fi concept and cleverly inserted into the story, not to mention it interestingly provides the means for the two captains from different generations to meet (which is superior to the overdone time-travel method). The Nexus links to the very first Star Trek story, the original pilot "The Cage" and the 'antagonists' of that tale, the Talosians (an episode repeated, of course, in the Original Series’ only two-parter “The Menagerie"). You can't get much more Star Trek-ian than that.
I'll look at those other supposed plot holes you mention the next time I view the film and get back to you here. I'm pretty sure they can be easily explained by some technical loophole. It is, after all, science-fiction, not science-fact. As such, practically every episode and movie could be ripped to shreds if viewed with an exacting eye of rigid scrutiny.
At least there's no eye-rolling scene of the engineer bringing his wounded nephew to the Bridge instead of Sick Bay, as was ludicrously done in the hailed "Wrath of Khan."
Nexus really doesn't make any sense
Explain how its claimed you cant get into Nexus via a ship because they get damaged/destroyed yet Kirk gets into it that way
You are not correcting the errors which have been pointed out so not sure why you are quoting.
I did answer your main criticism:
Neither Kirk's Enterprise nor the ships carrying El-Aurian refugee came in intentional contact with the Nexus. The refugee ships were inadvertently snared by the mysterious energy ribbon and the Enterprise came to rescue them. The Enterprise was only able to save some of the refugees before the ships were destroyed. A total of 318 people lost their lives; only 47 were saved. Meanwhile the Enterprise incurred heavy damage and Kirk is declared lost in space, but was actually transferred into the Nexus. You can attribute this to James T. Kirk's acclaimed luck or, perhaps, the Nexus was able to receive him because the hull/bulkhead was removed prior to claiming him. Remember, the Enterprise wasn't trying to fly into the ribbon, it was simply assisting the refugees.
If this is what happens with inadvertent vessel contact with the Nexus, then obviously you shouldn't try to enter the ribbon by directly approaching it with that intent; that is, if you want to live. As such, Soran had to come up with a creative plan to get back into the Nexus, which took eight decades of research and planning. Even then, he was taking a risk, but he was addicted to the illusory 'paradise.'
Explain how the Klingons penetrate the Enterprise-D shields, but don't target something important, so the ship's fine but the Enterprise controllers don't change the shield frequencies, which is something they had to do when facing the Borg on a regular basis; so they allow themselves to be hit multiple times. Yet, when you consider the location of the hits, none of them are major systems. (Later on, the Klingons target the Bridge before they are hacked and destroyed).
You speak of "many other" supposed plot holes as well. I'm sure one of them is this oft-cited one, which happens to be easily explained:
Picard's purpose in leaving the Nexus was to stop Soran from annihilating the Enerprise-D crew and the entire Veridian solar system, including the 230 million people that live on Veridian IV. Since Picard could leave the Nexus and "go anywhere any time," as Guinan pointed out earlier, why go to Veridian III about a minute before Soran launches his rocket? Why not go back to when Soran was a guest on the Enterprise-D and apprehend him then and there? Writer Ronald D. Moore defended Picard's decision on the grounds that Picard didn't want to risk the dangerous and unexpected consequences that can occur when tampering with the timeline; hence, his journey back in time from the Nexus is only a matter of a minute or so.
For instance, the concept of the Nexus is fascinating: No matter how much we want it, an illusory paradise is just that — an illusion. This concept and its implementation into the storyline is nothing short of brilliant.
I respect your perspective, but he had to die sometime in the Star Trek universe and, after almost three decades from Kirk's debut, "Generations" was as good a time/place as any.
share
Yeah, but Kirk could have - would have - lived forever if Picard didn't get him.
Without the Nexus, Kirk would have died by the time of Next Gen, but I wouldn't have had to watch it.
Kirk's death was a statement by the creators in 1994 -- the Original Series films with the original actors are gone for good. Time for TNG's cinematic run, which lasted 9 years.
"Generations" is a quality installment in the franchise, filled with gems to mine. It's definitely worthy of repeat viewings.
I agree with you on both points, but it still comes down to to me, and what I don't want is to watch my heroes die - which is why I personally won't rewatch Generations. As great as Wrath was (I saw them all first run starting with TMP) and despite my enthusiastic ravings of Wrath of Khan to my friends imploring them to see it, I rarely rewatch it and never the part where Spock dies.
The movie was kinda given an "average" appraisal when it came out. Nobody seemed to love it or hate it really that much. Then with Red Letter Media skewered it back around 2009 or so, that led to a system-wide re-evaluation of the film. I agree with pretty much everything they said. I hate all the TNG movies because they took a somewhat slow, cerebral TV show and tried to turn it into a series of action-movies.
This movie did indeed drop the ball on coming up with a smart way to get Picard and Shatner together, and then it didn't have them do much together either that made any sense. Soren was a pretty weak villain too.
As weak as Star Trek V was, I'd rate this as even worse, because at least V had a few good scenes sprinkled in there, like when McCoy has to face his pain, etc.
I agree but it was still a good if not great film. Also with his ego, I'm surprised that Shatner didn't insist Kirk be in more of the movie.
share