This movie feels like it should have been a bigger deal - Star Trek: Generations (1994) Discussion

[–] bozo_500 (13105) 2 years ago

yeh the much anticipated crossover movie (Kirk meets Picard!), also the 1st TNG movie (essentially TNG The Motion Picture), and had the Enterprise D destruction, introduction never seen before Enterprise, time travel, klingons, Malcolm McDowell as the villain, just everything (culminating in the biggest event of all Trek - the death of Kirk).. The only thing really missing was of course the entire original cast (or spock & bones)

It should've been Star Treks Endgame but turned out more like Star Treks Eternals

reply

[–] legnadibrom (6214) 2 years ago

when it came out in the cinema it was all the rage

reply

[–] strntz (12224) 2 years ago

At the end of the day (or is it millenium), viewers just don't like to watch their friends and heroes die. The Wrath of Khan is great but I never watch it because Spock dies (even though I know he comes back).

I don't watch The Search for Spock because Kirk gets Spock back but his son dies.

I don't watch Generations because Kirk dies.

I don't watch The Final Frontier because the whole movie dies.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8732) 2 years ago

As far as I'm concerned, "Generations" is easily the best of the Next Generation films and ranks with the best of the franchise. It was a big deal when released for Christmas, 1994 (or early 1995 most everywhere else), and very successful at the box office. While the next film, "First Contract," did even better at the box office, I prefer "Generations." "First Contact" is a crowd-pleaser (not that that's a bad thing necessarily) whereas "Generations" has more depth in the tradition of Roddenberry's original vision.

For instance, the concept of the Nexus is fascinating: No matter how much we want it, an illusory paradise is just that — an illusion. This concept and its implementation into the storyline is nothing short of brilliant. Who created the Nexus? Who else but the Talosians, the 'antagonists' of Trek's very first episode, "The Cage," a tale repeated in the Original Series’ only two-parter “The Menagerie."

There are several other highlights: The usual Trek humor, Data’s amusing experiences with the emotion chip, Malcolm McDowell’s outstanding performance as the mad Soran, his believable obsession and justifications, B’Etor & Lursa and the renegade Klingons, the startling obliteration of them and their vessel, the thrilling crash-landing of the Enterprise-D, the meeting of Kirk and Picard in the Nexus, the final showdown with Soran and Kirk’s death.

This “passing-of-the-torch” installment requires an attention span and an appreciation for high-concept sci-fi; it will bore to tears those for whom Star Trek means only neato spacecrafts and superficial space dogfights (not that there's anything wrong with that, lol). In addition, Generations has the gonads to make bold changes — killing off a major iconic character, and fairly prominent support characters as well, not to mention destroying the Enterprise-D.

As for the supposed plot holes some armchair critics whine about, they're actually pretty easily explained.

reply

[–] MillerJones (526) 11 days ago

No

I would say the best generations film is First Contact & Nemesis after.

It did well at box office because it was hot straight after the end of tv show.

Nexus really doesn't make any sense neither does the poor story for the movie.

The movie started well with Ent-B but started to go silly when they was able to transport some of the people out that is when it started to make 0 sense on wards.

Easily explained ok if you say so many which cant be.

Explain how its claimed you cant get into Nexus via a ship because they get damaged/destroyed yet Kirk gets into it that way,

Explain how Klingons penetrate Ent-D shield dont target something important so ships fine but they dont change shield frequencies something they had to do for the Borg on regular basis so they allow themselfs to be hit multi times again when you look at locations none of them are major systems (Later on klingons are going to target bridge before they are hacked and destroyed)

Many others as well

reply

[–] Wuchak (8732) 10 days ago

My order for the TNG movies would be: Generations, Nemesis, First Contact, Insurrections.

I find the Nexus a brilliant sci-fi concept and cleverly inserted into the story, not to mention it interestingly provides the means for the two captains from different generations to meet (which is superior to the overdone time-travel method). The Nexus links to the very first Star Trek story, the original pilot "The Cage" and the 'antagonists' of that tale, the Talosians (an episode repeated, of course, in the Original Series’ only two-parter “The Menagerie"). You can't get much more Star Trek-ian than that.

I'll look at those other supposed plot holes you mention the next time I view the film and get back to you here. I'm pretty sure they can be easily explained by some technical loophole. It is, after all, science-fiction, not science-fact. As such, practically every episode and movie could be ripped to shreds if viewed with an exacting eye of rigid scrutiny.

At least there's no eye-rolling scene of the engineer bringing his wounded nephew to the Bridge instead of Sick Bay, as was ludicrously done in the hailed "Wrath of Khan."

reply

[–] Wuchak (8732) 9 days ago

Nexus really doesn't make any sense

As I pointed out, the Nexus was probably created by the Talosians from "The Cage" and "The Menagerie," who were obsessed with providing an illusionary sanctuary for qualifying people, like Pike and Vina. If not created by them, it was formulated by a race like them, with a similar perspective.

Since Star Trek is intrinsically about encountering the unknown in outer space -- and the myriad mysteries thereof -- the Nexus doesn't have to make perfect sense. It simply exists in the Star Trek universe and the protagonists have to deal with it. Great mysteries go hand-and-hand with space exploration.

Explain how its claimed you cant get into Nexus via a ship because they get damaged/destroyed yet Kirk gets into it that way

It's established later in "Generations" that Soran was unable to safely fly a ship into the ribbon, which explains his highly creative (and mad) scheme to destroy a star in order to manipulate the Nexus ribbon to the planet Veridian III. This is where he'll be able to safely enter back into an illusionary 'paradise,' which is like a drug to him and he's addicted. As such, it doesn't matter to him that millions of humanoids on a nearby planet will perish.

In the beginning of the movie, El-Aurian refugee ships were inadvertently snared by the mysterious energy ribbon. Kirk's Enterprise is able to save some of the refugees before their ships are destroyed, but becomes trapped by the ribbon. The Enterprise is heavily damaged, but ultimately freed. Unfortunately, Kirk is presumed dead since he went to the Control Room to help the ship escape after the trailing end of the ribbon tore open the ship's hull.

This entire opening segment showed that encountering the Nexus via a space vessel was very dangerous and trying to enter it this way was nigh suicidal. So Soren had to concoct a safer, surer way to enter the weird extra-dimensional realm that exists outside of normal space-time.

I'll address your other technical cavils once I give the film a rewatch; give me a week or two, thanks.

reply

[–] MillerJones (526) 8 days ago

You are not correcting the errors which have been pointed out so not sure why you are quoting.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8732) 8 days ago

I did answer your main criticism:

Neither Kirk's Enterprise nor the El-Aurian refugee ships came in intentional contact with the Nexus. The refugee ships were inadvertently snared by the mysterious energy ribbon and the Enterprise came to rescue them. The Enterprise was only able to save some of the refugees before the ships were destroyed. Meanwhile the Enterprise incurs heavy damage and Kirk is declared lost in space, but was actually transferred into the Nexus. You can attribute this to James T. Kirk's acclaimed luck or, perhaps, the Nexus was able to receive him because the hull/bulkhead was removed prior to claiming him. Remember, the Enterprise didn't try to fly into the ribbon, it was motionless in space, assisting the refugees.

If this is what happens with inadvertent vessel contact with the Nexus, then obviously you shouldn't try to enter the ribbon by directly flying into it or whatever; that is, if you want to live. As such, Soran had to come up with a creative plan to get back into the Nexus, which took decades of research and planning. Even then, he was taking a risk, but he was addicted to the illusory 'paradise.'

I'll get to your other nitpicks as soon as I rewatch the movie.

reply

[–] strntz (12224) 10 days ago

For instance, the concept of the Nexus is fascinating: No matter how much we want it, an illusory paradise is just that — an illusion. This concept and its implementation into the storyline is nothing short of brilliant.

The nexus is indeed a fascinating phenomenon. There are few such things in sci-fi as compelling as the nexus. Maybe the Krell power generator in Forbidden Planet qualifies, or the sentient HAL in 2001.

The reason I've only seen this film once is that Kirk dies in it. I spent 60 years watching James T. romp around the universe and giving The Shat a death scene ruins the film for me.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8732) 10 days ago

I respect your perspective, but he had to die sometime in the Star Trek universe and, after almost three decades from Kirk's debut, "Generations" was as good a time/place as any.

reply

[–] strntz (12224) 10 days ago

Yeah, but Kirk could have - would have - lived forever if Picard didn't get him.

Without the Nexus, Kirk would have died by the time of Next Gen, but I wouldn't have had to watch it.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8732) 10 days ago

Kirk's death was a statement by the creators in 1994 -- the Original Series films with the original actors are gone for good. Time for TNG's cinematic run, which lasted 9 years.

"Generations" is a quality installment in the franchise, filled with gems to mine. It's definitely worthy of repeat viewings.

reply

[–] strntz (12224) 10 days ago

I agree with you on both points, but it still comes down to to me, and what I don't want is to watch my heroes die - which is why I personally won't rewatch Generations. As great as Wrath was (I saw them all first run starting with TMP) and despite my enthusiastic ravings of Wrath of Khan to my friends imploring them to see it, I rarely rewatch it and never the part where Spock dies.

reply

[–] Aylmer (417) 10 days ago

The movie was kinda given an "average" appraisal when it came out. Nobody seemed to love it or hate it really that much. Then with Red Letter Media skewered it back around 2009 or so, that led to a system-wide re-evaluation of the film. I agree with pretty much everything they said. I hate all the TNG movies because they took a somewhat slow, cerebral TV show and tried to turn it into a series of action-movies.

This movie did indeed drop the ball on coming up with a smart way to get Picard and Shatner together, and then it didn't have them do much together either that made any sense. Soren was a pretty weak villain too.

As weak as Star Trek V was, I'd rate this as even worse, because at least V had a few good scenes sprinkled in there, like when McCoy has to face his pain, etc.

reply

[–] Dogiswhite (1288) 10 days ago

I agree but it was still a good if not great film. Also with his ego, I'm surprised that Shatner didn't insist Kirk be in more of the movie.

reply