MovieChat Forums > Son in Law (1993) Discussion > I'm a farmer

I'm a farmer

posted 19 years ago by murfe03
34 replies | jump to latest

How about the part where he drove the combine and tore up the field and wrote "crawl" (somehow) and then pulls back and stops. The dad is there and looks at theo and says "were you worried there". In real life he would have plowed his ass under for destroying his main income and then getting out and signing country boy. What *beep* movie. The beginning is great when they are in colleg, but when she comes back looking and talking like a *beep* movie really went down hill. I still cringe when the grandpa does that pauly shore studdering talk in the end. Then the dad yells "lets munch on some grindage". What a crock.

[–] brechmacher 18 years ago

You know, it could be a reference to Aerosmith's "Crazy" video. Just a thought.

[–] ispitonyergrave 17 years ago

oh dude i LOVED that video. and cryin' too. but both of those videos came out in like 1996 or 97. son in law is from 1993.

and all you turds who don't like son in law, man, that sucks for you. i bet you don't like teen wolf or bill & ted either. turds.

[–] cdwillis 17 years ago

Actually Cryin' came out in 1993 just like Son In Law. Crazy came out in 1994 though.

[–] juxtaposdbologna 17 years ago

Well I have worked on several farms in my life and currently work at 3. And while I know farm life is hard work and people take pride in it, I thought this movie was funny and entertaining no matter how unrealistic it may seem. Of course that wouldn't play out the way it did in real life, that's why it's a Pauly Shore movie.

[–] GreenEyedBrit 16 years ago

Pretty much what I thought of it also....good summary

[–] colorado_rancher 16 years ago

Pauly Shore being mangled by the combine would have been a much better movie.

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] joe_cliff 14 years ago

Don't you be calling yourself a farmer!

You don't know what you got 'til you lose it.

[–] woolhatgrl 14 years ago

rofl!! that was great :D

"Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed nuclear accelerator on his back."

[–] ridgerunner72160-609-362419 14 years ago

I agree. Now that would have made the movie great if that Crawl jerkoff had gotten destroyed in the combine.

[–] JrnlofEddieDeezenStudies 13 years ago

One can't really be much dumber than picking out a film like Son in Law to take up 90 minutes of one's time when one primarily judges films on whether they show just what "real life" is like on a surface level.

http://www.rateyourmusic.com/~JrnlofEddieDeezenStudies

[–] nutsberryfarm 12 years ago

what hampers this movie is the fact it isn't 'bio-dome'. nothing more, nothing less.

Season's Greetings

[–] lithotomy 11 years ago

I know farmers 18,000 times cooler than you.