MovieChat Forums > Point of No Return (1993) Discussion > Were we suposed to feel sorry for Maggie...

Were we suposed to feel sorry for Maggie?


She had absolutely no remorse for what she did. She only pouted that she "will have to pay for it the rest of her life".

If the man she murdered had children, they are without their father the rest of their life. If he had siblings, they are without their brother the rest of their lives. Parents lost a son the rest of their lives. All are in pain knowing their loved one was murdered for the rest of their lives.

And she thought she should get to live like it never happened? She thought she should say "I don't want to live with it anymore"?

reply

I agree that Nina (Fonda) should've been executed for her crime, but...

The movie works in that it makes the viewer care about Nina and her plight; at least that's what it did for me. This is basically a story of redemption and we want Nina to reform and find happiness, but how can she when she's conscripted to kill people?

Did I say 'conscripted'? Enslavement is more like it since Nina HAS to obey orders or die; and the secret agency can get away with it because to all intents and purposes Nina doesn't even exist.

Also, the movie does stress that Nina is genuinely penitent; it just takes awhile for her to do so (which is what 'rehabilitation' is all about). Watch it again and you'll see.

reply

I watched it twice. I never saw her being truly sorry because what she did was horrible, only because she has to live with it the rest of her life. I never saw her do anything to redeem herself, no selfless acts, just what she had to do to get what she wanted.


reply

It's a movie about redemption. At the beginning, Maggie's clearly a drug-addled loser and is worthy of death for her crime. The viewer is not supposed to like her or respect her at this point. The fact that she's worthy of only death is precisely why and how the government is able to conscript her (condemn her) to the life of a government-backed assassin.

I and other viewers were able to begin rooting for Maggie because of her character arc: She clearly develops a conscience and struggles over the idea of killing people for a living, e.g. the gig in New Orleans.

What was her mistake? Murdering the cop, right? Does she come close to killing an innocent person throughout the rest of the movie (disregarding the entire first act, which details her being broken and rebuilt by the secret organization)? No. This is proof that she did learn from her mistake.

Moreover, she develops to the point where she doesn't want to kill anyone ever again, innocent or corrupt (the obvious exception would be justified personal killing, like if a dude is intent on raping/murdering her or a loved one).

What was the root cause of her murder? Her extreme drug addiction, right? The rest of the movie shows that she repents of this as well.

People have the wrong idea about repentance if they think that it's all about boo-hooing over a bad deed. What good is this if the person continues with the negative behavior? It wouldn't be genuine penitence, although it may indicate bondage/addiction to the behavior.

True repentance means to change one's mind (thinking) for the positive, which compels the person to make a 180 from the negative behavior in question. This is what Maggie does in the story.

Her redemption is further established by the love of the two men in life -- P.J. and Bob -- the latter who admits his love for Maggie to P.J. at the end. Their love -- and Amanda's -- assists in Maggie's reformation. Without love there is no redemption.

reply

True repentance also means recognizing what was wrong with what you did, not thinking "ok, I don't want to be punished anymore for it." It is a combination of both. Not just "what do I need to do to make my own situation better?"

reply

The filmmakers opted to take the subtle route as far as Maggie showing any remorse or moral anguish over killing the cop. It's possible that a scene was written and maybe even shot that depicted something to this effect, but they cut it for one reason or another. More likely, they wanted to show her rehabilitation as a gradual enlightenment and change as she performs her "penance" killing people for the government.

This is clear in the bathroom scene at the Mardi Gras where she can barely pull the trigger and, after she does, she weeps at her living damnation. P.J. enters the room and instinctively knows something horrible had happened, even if it was just Maggie experiencing ghosts of the past; actually it was both -- she just killed someone she didn't know from Adam and she was grieving over her past misdeeds that brought her to this living hell.

This scene reveals that Maggie had finally developed a conscience, meaning she had grown spiritually. It's after this occasion that she actively seeks an escape from her damnation, which -- again -- illustrates her genuine repentance.

That said, I agree that she was a pathetic, drug-addled loser at the beginning of the film and definitely deserved death, but the government blocked this for their own selfish purposes. Give Maggie credit: She could've remained a conscience-less killing machine at the government's beck & call, making great money and living "well", like The Cleaner (Keitel ) -- a lifeless, loveless shell of a human being; a living zombie -- but she refused to do this and even risks capture & certain death in order to find freedom to an uncertain and much less lavish future.

In short, she was redeemed.

reply

Oooooh, lots of controversial, or at least, SOME controversial thoughts and statements here. :)

reply