Terrible Narration


Sorry to Ms. Joanne Woodward but her reading of the narration was painful to listen to. I guess she got her direction from Scorsese so maybe he's to blame. Either way it was boring and detracted from the film. For me anyway.

reply

I am a huge fan of Joanne Woodward's, so it isn't about her to me at all. I just don't think a film should rely on narration to convey plot details and the building of characters. It violates the "Show, don't tell" maxim. There are all sorts of ways these ideas could have been conveyed cinematically without a narrator. Narration feels like a cheat to me and it pulls me out of the film.

reply

I'm not a fan of narration, especially when the words unfold in the action of the actors. As for telling the story, I would have opted for romantic. It would contradict the emotions played out, since most had no idea of romance. But maybe it's straightforwardness compliments the conflicted emotions. No one is whom they seem to be.

If we can save humanity, we become the caretakers of the world

reply

To me - the narration set the mood for a lousy movie.

A good movie only needs minimal spoon feeding of plot to the audience. In this movie it was overbearing and annoying.

reply

I also respectfully disagree. Had there been a category for narration, Ms. Woodward would easily have won the Oscar. Her quiet, well-bred delivery was very much on point, even while sharing a private joke with her "guests." I felt as though she was giving me a very much needed and welcomed private tour of another culture -- which it was.

reply

Ms. Woodward's narration was the glue that held this very fine film together. I can't imagine a better choice than her...she acts while not acting in the slightest, and that's genius.

reply

Her voice is perfect for Wharton's prose, many excerpts of which were recited verbatim from the text.

reply

Hated her delivery.

reply