Watching the 3rd Season of P&P, I don't think the writing is inferior to the first seasons, or the tone and atmosphere have radically changed. I had come to expect a sharp decline, having read some of the commentary on this board and elsewhere.
I think there were a few reasons why people thought the series was "Pete"-ring out, which, by the way, I think had nothing to do with Nickelodeon execs not 'getting' the series or wanting to cancel it because of poor ratings. To me, P&P just had run its natural course, and really had to end at about the time. My views:
* Growing pains. By the 3rd Season, Big Pete had become almost an adult, and Little Pete a teenager. This means the series' brotherly dynamic had inevitably changed. Little Pete, with his voicing breaking, and going through a growth spurt, could no longer be the cute little subversive rascal, with his rebellions as merely a little kid's innocuous whims, and Big Pete would be off to college in a while, or getting a job.
* Lack of novel subject matter. Though much of the appeal of the series was in its surrealism and absurdity, its premise was always firmly rooted in the reality of young American teens growing up. This limits the number of subjects you can deal with. So there's trouble at school, conflicts with restrictive parents and bullies, the strain of being in a competition with your team, the first pangs of love, favourite pets, a first summer job, and saying goodbye to friends. By the 3rd Season, the series has run out of fresh ideas, which is why we get another, less interesting and more one-dimensional bully (Pit Stain), an episode about geeky Teddy which reads like a rewrite of 'Freak, Geeks and Johnny Unitas', another 'Summer Holiday' vignette, this time around the pool, and one more 'Nightcrawlers', but all without the fresh, warped, offbeat quality.
* Inconsistency. This is what plagues most sitcoms, as they have to suddenly invent hobbies, relatives and friends to keep things interesting, even though we've never heard of them before. Unless the writers are extremely smart and prescient, we are suddenly confronted with Little Pete having a pet lizard (2nd season), only to be killed off in the same episode, and even later we learn that Little Pete's brashness is largely informed by his 'lucky penny'. Why didn't we ever learn about this before?
* Loss of key characters. The departure of as essential and hilarious a character as Artie dealt the series a heavy blow (though it wasn't an illogical step, with Little Pete growing up and having to fend for himself), and then there was a lack of Ellen's dad, and some of the really good youngsters of the first season, like Clem (Aaron Schwartz) and Natasha (Heather Matarazzo).
reply
share