this is one of the worst films i have ever seen!
i personally think this film is terrible, the acting is some of the worst ive seen, cant believe this is actually getting a kind of remake... awefull!
sharei personally think this film is terrible, the acting is some of the worst ive seen, cant believe this is actually getting a kind of remake... awefull!
shareexcellent film, possibly keitel's best....certainly his best performance.
This coming from someone who was born before 1982.
Do not feed the troll.
He has not replied, nor will he ever. But he's checking back hourly to see if anuone else acknowledged his worthless existence.
Never be complete.
People not liking a film does not make them a troll, though I often wonder why people come to message boards of films they despise to bash them. Seems like something born of jealously, they don't understand why others like the film and it bothers them so they react with hostility. Instead of actually just not liking a film where you would not waste your time on a message board, I don't know. As for the film itself like someone else said it is meant to be unpleasant its not supposed to even be enjoyable to watch its for students of film and art (and no I don't mean that literally).
shareVince- did a great job summing up whats going on here. Here's another way to say it;
'What a gross and ugly movie, I hate it'
'you don't get it cuz yer dum'
'If you think that's art, you have poor taste.'
'If you think you have taste then you don't know art, blah, blah, blah ...
If civilization is destined to fail, I'm certain it is because of one of these two things;
A) Failure to achieve peace in the middleeast
2) Failure to achieve peace on IMDB message boards
What the hell are you talking about?! This is Harvey Keitels Best leading actor performance in film history!!! (For Christ sakes he won the Indiependent Spirit Award for Best Actor in a leading Role) whereas Steve Buscemi who played Mr.Pink in Reservoir Dogs also won the same award not in Keitels category but for best actor in a supporting role!!!!! :)
shareIf this is one of the worst films you have ever seen, I can only assume that you have not seen that many movies.
I have literally seen thousands of films that are far worse than this. Yes, thousands....
My vote history: http://us.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=9354248
I find this film to be highly entertaining as a black comedy.
shareI completely agree. This is coming from someone who "knows art" as compared to the people "who don't". It is very slow, and hard to get into; don't know why the mexican guy just gave him $30,000 for no reason?; he did not redeem himself; Harvey Keitel naked is not a pretty sight; and the only "acting" Keitel is actually doing is screaming in the same pitch in a few scenes sometimes for minutes at a time.
Not only did the movie give me a headache, but it also made me want to put a grenade in my mouth and blow my head in 150 different directions. I think I have mental issues after watching this movie. It sucks that bad.
Also a 92' film with Keitel in the lead, I'd suggest Reservoir Dogs instead of this piece of garbage.
"Are you gonna' bark all day little doggy, or are you gonna' bite?"
"This is coming from someone who "knows art" as compared to the people "who don´t"".
And then he goes on to lambast the film on the basis of Harvey Keitel looking bad naked - and substituting further criticism for sharing lurid fantasies involving hand grenades. Hilarious.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
"don't know why the mexican guy just gave him $30,000 for no reason?"
No point in arguing with someone who did not bother to think about what this film was really about. But the money is worth discussing.
First of all, it's NY, therefore, in all probablity, the guy was Puerto Rican, not Mexican. But since we don't have absolute confirmation, let's just say he was Latino.
Since one of the first scenes was LT trying to swipe a bag of coke without turning it in, I thought Mr. Cigar Box had been selling a similar misplaced package for LT and they were splitting profits. Anyone have a better idea?
What a great, in depth review! By the way, the word is "awful" without an "e". You twit.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
Your taste is in your ASS
--Ju know what a "Hasa" is Frank!?! Dat's a PIG, that don't "FLY STRAIGHT"
Just finished watching this. While I can appreciate Harvey's acting I really didn't like the movie at all. You pretty much know he's a goner 20 minutes into the movie, and at times it was just exhausting to watch given how exhausted and burned out he was coming down from everything he was on.
I certainly don't mind drug movies or corruption of the law topics, so it wasn't really the material or premise that I didn't like but overall I was just bored through most of it and disinterested in everyone.
Oh well to each their own I guess and while this movie had a certain artistic aspect to it, it by all means didn't do it for me
Well Roger Ebert whom is regarded as the best film critic to ever live arguably of course! But I miss his reviews because I relied so much on whether to view! He gave me many surprises which I would normals have not even consider seeing! Roger Ebert scored the movie 100 out of 100!
share