Furlong made $30K for this?
I hope Cameron and/or the studio gave the poor kid a bonus after it did so well.
shareI hope Cameron and/or the studio gave the poor kid a bonus after it did so well.
shareWhen Macauley Culkin did Home Alone he was paid $20,000. I guess there's nothing new about Hollywood paying kid actors peanuts.
Yeah but then he made $4.5 million for Home Alone 2. And $10 million I believe for Richie Rich.
shareAll inferior movies.
shareDon't think he cares with that pay rise.
shareWell he’d be stupid. His movies made over a billion and he didnt even make 20million.
shareYou can say that about any actor. Arnold only got paid $15 million for Terminator 2 and the movie made over half a billion at the box office, and closer to a billion with video rentals, DVDs and merchandise. Unless you're a producer or risking some of your own money, you're not going to get paid anything comparable to the box office gross.
shareI had thought they didn't actually pay the kid actor all that money for him to spend. I thought it was more that they put it into a bank account that they can't use til they turn 18. But what do I know?
shareTrue. The Jackie Coogan Law.
They can live off the earnings but the main sum stays in savings/investments.
That's how it's supposed to work, but apparently the law allows the parents to withdraw a certain percentage of the kids' earnings for "living expenses". Some stage parents have withdrawn a hell of a lot more than the law allows, and apparently there's no enforcement so the kid's only legal recourse was to turn 18 and sue. By then, the money is usually spent, so there's no getting it back.
So yeah, any money given to Furlong would probably have been claimed by his trashy family and spent while he was still a kid, but that doesn't mean he didn't deserve some sort of bonus when the film hit it big. That happens, some actors get paid extra to publicize the film, or get given extravagant gifts by the studio when a film hits big.
Ed Furlong wasn't the draw. Arnie was, the Terminator name was along with bringing back Linda Hamilton in a Terminator sequel.
Just like when everyone went mental over the guy from Captain Phillips. He got paid basic SAG rate for a no name.
This from an article,
"Abdi was paid just $65,000 for his work on the Tom Hanks film, a salary which he received two years ago. "
People were going bat shit about that. Like they expect a no name actor to get paid 20 million upfront for a film they didnt even know if would be successful.
Yeh they knew Terminator may be successful as much as they thought Predator 2 would be successful. But Furlongs name under the title doesnt really help that in any way so they get the usual SAG rate.
The Screen Actors Guild minimum for an actor is $60,000 — it’s the rate that Jonah Hill earned for “The Wolf of Wall Street and nobody went batshit at Scorcese or the numerous ovther cases where actors get paid minimum. Jonah Hill wasnt a no name, but the role could have been filled by 10 other people on his same level, just so happens he killed it and maybe the next film he asks for more if he is a supporting or side character.
Thing is if it is successful they get a bonus with all the interviews they get after promotion contract ends, merch and a whole list of things on something as big as T-2
Jonah Hill offered to work for SAG minimum because he desperately wanted to work with Scorcese and Leo, and he knew that role and that movie would be huge for him. As he explained to Howard Stern "I took the minimum on that role, so that I could get $20 million for 22 Jump Street".
shareThat's not bad for a 13 y/o for his first movie. It would be $65,000 today.
shareWow that’s not much. He should have gotten a backend bonus.
share