Both 1 & 2 were violent, so why is this one so much more repellent?
I don't know, what is it? Is it the lingering and gratuitous sadism towards so many characters, including some innocent bystanders? Is it the suggestion that the general public (including children) are as cruel and violent as the criminals? Something about this movie is repellent and unsavory. The first film was razor sharp and satiric, while this one just seemed angry and bitter, going out of its way to make the audience feel dirty and complicit somehow. Maybe it's Verhoeven leftist political beliefs, putting the blame squarely on the capitalism-run-amuck OCP. The film at the end us oddly uplifting. This one just seemed angry at the world with no ultimate message other than humanity sucks.
share