Most polarizing movie
I'm firmly in the "love it" camp, and I run into people who hate it, but what really strikes me after all these years is that there's no middle ground. I've never met anyone who was indifferent to JVTV, or who felt it was "okay."
And I can't think of another movie that has engendered such an all-or-nothing response from viewers.
Here's my stab at an explanation: it's caught between two worlds.
On the one hand, it's an incredible piece of art from all concerned: the script, the acting, and the incredible art design.
But on the other hand, it was imbued with elements of a wacky comedy. At the time it was made, Tom Hanks wasn't "Tom Hanks" yet -- and the studio didn't quite know what to do with him. This wasn't the "Philadelphia" or "Saving Private Ryan" guy. He was still the "Bosom Buddies" and "Bachelor Party" guy. Hadn't even made "A League of Their Own" yet.
So what we got was an odd amalgam of "Shanley's deeply moving carpe diem parable" and "Hanks's yuk-yuk sendup." Note that I'm not indicting Hanks here -- I think he knew what he was about. But if it had been made even five years later, do you really think we would have had a Muppet shark that growls like a tiger? Would the Waponi have been so over-the-top?
A person I know, very knowledgable about film, said he'd admired this script for years -- and only later saw the movie, finding it "terrible."
Do you agree that this film is tremendously polarizing? What's your take on why?