MovieChat Forums > Dick Tracy (1990) Discussion > Madonna almost ruined this movie

Madonna almost ruined this movie


No one has hit upon it yet, but Madonna is an awful actress and has a hammy stage presence. That's great if you're a mediocre pop singer whose oversexed music videos help people forget how great your voice isn't, but it's really detrimental to efforts to play a female lead in a movie. She stunk up this movie like she's done all her others (Shanghai Surprise, Who's That Girl, Evita, Suddenly Seeking Susan, to name a few--A League of Their Own is the only exception, but that's only because she had a small role). She is sooooo melodramatic, and it would be awful if she were acting, but if you watch Truth or Dare, which filmed around the same time as this movie, she acts the same way in that too (the banter she has with Beatty in T or D makes you fully understand why he broke up with her-he probably regretted letting her be in his movie, but that's what you do in 1989 when you're shtupping who was then the world's most popular female singer). That leads me to believe that she's that corny in real life too. I won't begrude her songwriting or her musical ability on stage--she has a strong voice and gets 150% out of the skills she has. But let's face it, she's no Julie Andrews, Judy Garland, or Lena Horne. She's especially no Barbara Streisand or Bette Midler. What she has always been is a controversial and opportunistic, kind of like a white Diana Ross mixed with a little Marilyn Manson.

Imagine in Michelle Pfieffer had been Breathless Mahoney instead? Anyway, just had to vent my "Madonna sucks as an actress" beef.

reply

Every time Madonna came on screen I thought how much better Michelle or Kim Basinger would have been.

reply

You're right Madonna almost ruined this movie. Unfortunately several other factors ruined it before she could.

--
You have many question, Mr Sparkle. I send you premium -- answer question, hundred percent!

reply

Total agreement with OP. She is definitely the worst part of the movie, and the songs she sings are so horribly annoying.

-----
Before you jump on me, know this: I rarely think things through before posting.

reply

The best things about this movie are the production design, Elfman's sensational score, and... Madonna? Frankly, I wasn't bothered by her acting here. In fact, like a few others have mentioned, I found her acting to be better than everyone else's (only Glenne Headly impressed as much as her). I'm no fan of her, but she was believable to me.

Anyway, I'd give props to Pacino as well, but when you give an over-acting genius like him a cartoon role, it's going to get really loud and annoying (he was entertaining nonetheless).


Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!

reply

please someone tell me what in the hell hammy means.

also i think madonna's so hot in the movie

i assumed coming here i'd read omg madonna turned this film into masterpiece of hotness or whatever.

isn't it curious how things turn out?

reply

Without her, this movie would be forgotten.

reply

that's ridiculous... Dick Tracy is a great cult classic

reply

No, she wasnt good, but you're making her performance sound horrendous and she really wasnt that bad...

Someone else wouldve been better, but she really wasnt terrible

reply

Are you still in 1996 ? get over it

reply

lolwut?

Please stop.

reply