MovieChat Forums > Darkman (1990) Discussion > Screaming for a remake

Screaming for a remake


Would a remake be better than this one or worse?

reply

I don't know if a remake or a reboot would be better. Part of what made this movie great for me was Raimi's doing. Oddly enough, I don't like his Spider-Man movies or Xena & Hercules. I think Darkman has potential to be a good remake or reboot. I'd rather see a reboot myself rather than a remake or a sequel to Raimi's movies. And yes there is a difference between remakes & reboots.

Why do people complain about remakes & reboots anyway? Just don't watch them. The Original will always be there for you to enjoy.

DISPLAY thy breasts, my Julia!

reply

Darkman was good, but it was ruined by two sucky sequels. That's why a reboot would be a better idea.

reply

Agreed!

Actually I don't remember much of the sequels. Were they that bad?

DISPLAY thy breasts, my Julia!

reply

yep, they were that bad.

reply

This film doesn't need a remake; it's fine the way that it is.

I'm a totally bitchin' bio writer from Mars!

reply

I just want more Darkman. Sequel, reboot, tv adaptation. Hell even an ongoing comic series would be great!

reply

If there's one thing I've learned from the IMDb message boards, it's that remakes are the worst possible thing anyone could ever do and that even suggesting a movie be remade is equivalent to spitting in the face of God.

All joking aside, people get way too worked up about remakes. There have been some fantastic remakes in the past, some of them even better than their original. Yeah, there are more awful remakes than good ones but so what? There are more awful original movies than good ones and no one says we should stop making original movies.

The complaint I always hear is how it will "ruin" the original. How? I love John Carpenter's The Thing and I thought the 2011 "premakequel" was terrible. But you know what? I still have my copy of Carpenter's version and it's just as good as it was before. Planet of the Apes, The Pink Panther, Psycho, etc. are all still great movies. A bad remake does not ruin the original. If anything it just helps highlight what made the original so good in the first place. Is it really so hard to ignore bad movies? Are there really people who can't watch the original Godzilla anymore because Roland Emmerich made an awful movie 15 years ago? I don't get it.

Worst case scenario: A remake is terrible. You've probably read the reviews first so you know to avoid it. The movie bombs. Everyone hates it. The concept is poison for a decade or so before anyone even considers trying again. Pros: No more unwanted remakes or sequels. Cons: Disappointment. Example: Godzilla.

Best case scenario: A remake is amazing. You enjoy it as much if not more than the original. It's a critical and commercial success. Pros: It launches the careers of it's director and/or star(s). It's influence can still be seen decades later. It creates/popularizes a genre. It's a damn good movie. Cons: It may outshine the original. Example: A Fistful of Dollars.

Maybe it's just me, but I'd gladly ignore 100 "Godzilla" level remakes for the chance to see just 1 "A Fistful of Dollars".

Holy *beep* that was longer than I expected.

reply

The thing that made the original so good was Sam Raimis direction.

reply

If studios remade this it wouldn't be as intense...it'd have to be rated PG-13.

Even the most primitive society has an innate respect for the insane.

reply

Looks like the remake comes out in a couple of months but they're calling it Deadpool.

I kid.

reply

Not that Darkman is a great example of this BUT....

The backlash is the now remakes take all character & plot away from films in exchange for FX. With the rare exception, just about every remake since 2005 has exchanged story for action.

And yes, it is an age thing. Most adults that work around Hollywood, particularly writers & directors, still praise Chinatown as one of the best screenplays ever written.

The story is why movie viewers between 35-65, on average,love Chinatown upon viewing it, claiming that it is "riveting & suspenseful."

Most movie viewers between 14-25 today site Chinatown's lack of action & special effects as the main reason that the film is so "boring."

The call for remakes falls between the 14-25 age range & the vast majority support movies with action & special effects as the draw while claiming that plot & character development make films "dull & boring."

This can be shown from the reaction to "The Debt" & more recently "Trumbo" in the different age groups.

Furthermore the concept of satire in film is lost on post Generation-X movie viewers.

It all adds up to a lust for remakes among Millennial & later generations & an almost wholesale rejection of remakes from Generation X & Baby Boomers.



reply

Maybe you should stop watching movies for good. Get a new hobby like the choking game.

reply