Yes dogs die, death exists etc. But the reason this particular death fails and is so horrible is because the movie had been a comedy up to that point. Yes there were murders and such but the movie was still basically a comedy. The dog doing funny dog things. Being adorable. Turner becoming more attached to the dog as the movie progressed simply because the dog was so amazing.
What you're saying is objectively wrong. The suggestion that comedies can't be deeply emotional is wrong. Is the movie less of a comedy because Hoochs owner was murdered at the beginning of the movie? No. So why does a death at the end of the movie change the entire movie? The answer is, it doesn't.
Hooch's death completes his arc as a character. He sacrifices himself for Turner, something he would not have done at the beginning of the movie.
And then BAM they kill the dog. I mean, what the hell? It just came out of nowhere and it just didn't fit with the tone of the film.
No it didn't come out of nowhere. If you honestly think that, you have NO CONCEPT of writing and should stop commenting right now. It fit the film perfectly, if you understand character arcs.
And yes there were puppies at the end but so what? Turner had died. It's like saying that it's ok that your pet has died, you have puppies now. No the pet still died. You can't just replace it with a puppy or a kitten. it doesn't work that way.
Turner didn't die. Hooch taught Turner to love animals. Pets do die. It's unrealistic to expect Turner to not want to be around dogs when the woman he ended up marrying was a vet.
The puppy isn't a REPLACEMENT for Hooch. That was not the intention or implication.
The new home of Welcome to Planet Bob:
http://kingofbob.blogspot.ca/
reply
share