MovieChat Forums > Some Kind of Wonderful (1987) Discussion > Was this what the social structure was l...

Was this what the social structure was like at your high school?


So after watching this movie, along with a few other Hughes' ones like Pretty in Pink or, to a lesser extent, The Breakfast Club, something has been bothering me. In all these pictures he portrays high school cliques as divided very rigidly upon financial class. The rich kids are cool and popular and flaunt their money, the blue collar kids are shunned, left on the outside looking in.

This has been bugging me because this was nothing like how the social status was built at my high school, and because of that it seems really inauthentic and cheesy to me. I still liked the movies; regardless of wealth the message of being an outsider and wanting to be understood still rings true, but it seems like this economic hierarchy is just added to give us one more reason we should sympathize with/root for the protagonists and view them as underdogs, and it just seems forced to me.

So my question is, are most high schools actually like that? Is popularity based stringently on how much money a kid's parents make? If so I guess I should start cutting these films some slack, but it just seems so foreign to me. My high school was similar to the one portrayed in Some Kind of Wonderful I'd say, relatively middle class with a spectrum of family incomes from working class to upper middle class. And there were certainly cliques, there were popular kids, jocks, goths, theater dorks, etc, but membership in these groups had almost nothing to do with money or material stuff, it was attitude and interests that determined your place. And yeah, I s'pose the in-crowd tended to wear "trendier" clothing, but no one bragged about their exotic vacations or their big houses, because half the time they were working-class anyway and the other half wouldn't want to offend their friends.

Maybe it was just an 80's thing, I dunno.

Any perspectives would be helpful, I'm quite curious.

reply

I went to school in South Bend, IN in the 80s and it was a lot like this. The rich kids who didn't go to the private Catholic schools (mostly kids of the Notre Dame instructors, along with the doctor/lawyer kids) were mostly snobs. The usual cliques were the Preppies, (i.e. rich kids and yes Izod was king), poor kids, jocks, freaks (i.e. the druggies though of course drugs also crossed all clique boundaries), etc.

I don't know if it's a Midwest thing, (all Hughes' films were based in Chicago), but it definitely existed.

reply

I went to public schools in suburban Dallas (graduated in 1985) and family income wasn’t a major factor into who you hanged around. It was more a case of the extra-circular activities such as sports, drama, academic clubs you participated in…One thing from SKOW that reminded me of HS was whoever threw the most home parties had instant popularity and it didn’t matter if the beer bash was held at a mansion or mobile home. Unfortunately for me, my parents rarely left town.

reply

I guess it depends on what area you grew up in. I certainly did not see any cliques divided by financial class. Since we all went to the same high school, we all lived in basically the same neighborhood which meant we were all basically in the same financial class. THe more upperclass neighborhood was a mile or so away which had another high school which kids from that neighborhood went to. I guess in other areas there's less schools so it's kids from more different neighborhoods? That's the only sense I can make of it since it's seems strange that kids from poor neighborhoods would be at the same school as kids from rich neighborhoods.

reply

Great point to bring up about John Hughes movies.

I think that these were more or less a plot device for dramatical affect. Almost, in a way, he made them up that way because any other way would be less dramatical.

I think that in subtle ways economics influences who people hang with, but its much deeper. In these movies it seems a bit superficial.

I realized what you are talking about in watching this series of movies, but thought it was a Cali thing.

Notice that in 16 Candles and Ferris Bueller, those 2 movies are centered around upper class spoiled brats (especially Jake and Ferris) but there are no "poor kids" in those movies to root for. I kinda think it was better that way, though. But all his movies are American classics.

reply

Is it solely an American thing? It's quite a poignant theme in some dramas in Asia. Most notably perhaps in Filipino teen movies.

As for my own high school(s) - we moved from one place to another because of my parent's jobs. Hmm.... no such thing in the UK. It was different.

reply

Coppola did that even worse than Hughes in "The Outsiders." Still the brat pack though.

reply

At my high school (South Gate HS 1967-70)we had:

The "Cool" Kids (They were concieted ***holes)

The Soshes (Nerds, overly scholastic types. School Band)

The Beaners pre gang bangers (Self explanitory)

The Surfers (Pre FTaRH. NOBODY said "dude" Real surfers still don't)

The Stoners/Hippies

The Musicians (Mostly garage bands/Rockers) The band I roadied for cut an album. One of their songs was used in the movie Lost in Translation.)

The Non Categorized (Complete misfits/outcasts)

There was crossover sometimes. I ran with the Surfers Stoners Musicians.

"They sucked his brains out!"

reply

I think it was just an 80s thing. It was the material age. All my years in school and it never really mattered how much money your parents made, nor if you played sports or not. In fact, most of the football players at my school were cool guys and liked a lot of geeky *beep* The elitists at my high school were actually the smart geeky kids. Bunch of a-holes. If they didn't think you were smart enough, or if you simply weren't into the same anime they were into, they ditched you. I felt like I had to buy a Magic the Gathering deck for them to speak to me.

But one constant has always remained....being good looking matters. Good looking guys and girls could get anything they wanted. They were always popular, and most of them were nice people. If you weren't that great looking you were at a severe disadvantage. They got all the parts in plays, teachers took it easy on them, no one really picked on them, they were given more opportunities, they were all over the yearbook, and they weren't even part of a club. They just looked good so they got more pages. Since most of them were nice people who didn't have an elitist attitude because everyone liked them, it was hard to even hate them at all.

reply

I went to a semi rural junior high in the late '90s and a rural high school in the early '00s (only ever two black students at any given time it seemed, and graduating classes of under 100).

If you couldn't afford to wear (relatively) "expensive clothes", or take a plane vacation every year, you weren't welcomed into that clique.

I never wanted to join them since they were airheads and ***holes.

reply

my high school was made up of like 80% jocks/"popular" kids and they didnt ACT like they were all that but just KNEW they were the "kings & queens" & i never felt respected by them ever. They just stayed in their jock-y cliques & didn't want to accept anyone else into their world. very superficial.

reply