Did Clarence ever know who Robocop was?
I getting the feeling no. But I was wondering if I maybe missed some little details. I know Emil definitely knew. Maybe Emil told Clarence when they all met up again?
shareI getting the feeling no. But I was wondering if I maybe missed some little details. I know Emil definitely knew. Maybe Emil told Clarence when they all met up again?
shareEmil's mentioning it is a possibility, but Clarence might have recognized Murphy when his helmet was off.
That one's just up to the viewer.
-----
It's already mutated into human form! Shoot it!
I think Clarence put 2 and 2 together when RoboCop/Murphy confronted him at the steel mill during the climax (when RoboCop/Murphy tells him he no longer intends to arrest him, that is when Clarence remembers and realises he is a goner).
shareI think Clarence put 2 and 2 together when RoboCop/Murphy confronted him at the steel mill during the climax (when RoboCop/Murphy tells him he no longer intends to arrest him, that is when Clarence remembers and realises he is a goner).
He's surprised because he believes RoboCop to be programmed to not take things personally. Hence why he released Clarence at the coke factory earlier in the film
shareThat's a good point about the steel mill.
Emil caught on when he heard Robo say, "Dead or alive, you are coming with me." It's possible that Clarence remembers Murphy's voice, and that's how he put two-and-two together.
I like the ambiguity, but having Clarence realize who it is makes the revenge angle a little more substantial.
-----
It's already mutated into human form! Shoot it!
Yep, it's clear from his reaction he had heard that line before.
shareAs Clarence clearly sees Murphy's face at the end and would recognise his voice, I have no doubt that he knew. Plus Emil would likely have told the rest of the gang.
shareGood point. It makes sense that Emil would tell the gang about RoboCop's identity. Boddicker doesn't seem to recognize Murphy but I think he must've known.
DISPLAY thy breasts, my Julia!
I don't believe Clarence knew because he never did or said anything to indicate that he did. For me that's actually a flaw with the story, I would have liked Clarence to have known or acknowledge who Robocop was.
shareI doubt it. Murphy was just another murder to Clarence, and he never seems to recognize him at any point afterwards.
shareI don't think he knew, which just goes to show what a psychopath Clarence was. Even after seeing RoboCop without the mask on, he never recognized him because Clarence forgot all about Murphy after he killed him.
Would you like to know more?
Clarence is such a sociopath I don't think he can remember all the people he's killed, nor would he care.
shareDon't know, but i don't think he would have cared either.
That guy has got to be one of the worst scumbags in movie history.
He knew, for sure, the film just doesn't make a flat out point of it. 1) He sees his face at the end at the steel mill. 2) The "You're taking it kinda personal..." line is misconstrued-- it's a sick joke being cracked by Clarence at Robo/Murphy's expense, a sign of recognition. 3) Emil very likely would have mentioned it to Clarence at some point before the final showdown, especially considering he would have had to explain why he was hospitalized/arrested. "Remember that guy we killed? Right well he's now a pissed off cyborg out for revenge on us, just an FYI." The biggest thing is definitely Clarence seeing Robo's face at the end, however.
share1) He sees his face at the end at the steel mill.
2) The "You're taking it kinda personal..." line is misconstrued-- it's a sick joke being cracked by Clarence at Robo/Murphy's expense, a sign of recognition.
3) Emil very likely would have mentioned it to Clarence at some point before the final showdown, especially considering he would have had to explain why he was hospitalized/arrested. "Remember that guy we killed? Right well he's now a pissed off cyborg out for revenge on us, just an FYI."
The biggest thing is definitely Clarence seeing Robo's face at the end, however.
I don't really see it as conjecture so much as the writer being clever and not overburdening his script with redundancies. For example, not having TWO "It's YOU... I know you... We killed you!"scenes. From a structural standpoint, it would be superfluous to have yet another sequence like that. Robo discovers who he was, and then 1 of his killers recognizes him. Done deal, everyone knows 'who's who'. You're kind of meant to infer the rest of the gang knows who Robo is once Emil survives and rejoins them. He has that information, why would he not share that with them? Especially since they're literally about to go battle Robo at the steel mill? Ironically, I'd argue that you'd actually need an additional expository scene and another subplot just to explain what reason Emil could possibly have for NOT bringing it up. I find it an easy assumption to make. The fact that there's no line of dialogue hitting the nail on the head doesn't mean the inferences aren't there-- I think it's set up very logically.
To your point of Boddicker not necessarily recognizing Murphy's face-- Maybe he didn't, but if your argument is that "hes killed too many people to remember", then why does Emil recognize him? Emil would have forgotten him just as easily, based on that logic. And hell, Emil recognizes Robo without even seeing his face, just going by a single catchphrase and his voice-- you telling me Emil, a dumb grunt in Clarence's outfit was able to put that together, but Clarence, the brains of the operation, couldn't recognize Murphy seeing him full on, face and all? C'mon... now that, I feel, is a leap in logic.
Again, I think it's interesting to question the idea that maybe Clarence didn't recognize him, but all the signs point to yes, and in truth, it would take more coincidences to explain him NOT recognizing him. Best example I can give you, to sum up my point: Random scene, man goes grocery shopping. Shot of him staring at a Keurig coffee maker, licking his lips. Cut immediately to the next scene-- he's home, savoring and sipping from a fresh cup of hot coffee. Can we assume he made the coffee himself? Yes. Is it also possible his wife came home and made it for him instead between scenes? Also yes, but far less likely. While we don't see him actually make the cup, we can assume he did, based on the inferences.
All this said, I'd be VERY interested in finding out Ed Neumeier's take on it.
To your point of Boddicker not necessarily recognizing Murphy's face-- Maybe he didn't, but if your argument is that "hes killed too many people to remember", then why does Emil recognize him? Emil would have forgotten him just as easily, based on that logic. And hell, Emil recognizes Robo without even seeing his face, just going by a single catchphrase and his voice-- you telling me Emil, a dumb grunt in Clarence's outfit was able to put that together, but Clarence, the brains of the operation, couldn't recognize Murphy seeing him full on, face and all? C'mon... now that, I feel, is a leap in logic.Overall I agree with you, but it's worth noting that one of Emil's comrades was gunned down right before Emil's eyes. In addition, the slayer also points his firearm at Emil, mortally threatening him. Emil was invariably going to remember every word that the assailant uttered to him. Whereas Clarence and the others just walk in, not caught off guard at all, resolve the situation and move on with their lives, and the only thing Alex told him was "Buddy, I think you're slime." Clarence may or may not have committed those words to memory, but regardless, RoboCop never uttered them to him. share
I totally agree with this point...
Clarence knew and his 'personal' line is meant as another of his wise-cracks!
TS
I'm with the "Emil would have told him" crew on this.
Robocop's a world famous technological first, and then Emil realises that he is the guy they killed weeks/months previously. Then Robocop almost kills Emil and imprisons him. At some point offscreen, Emil gets out of prison, possibly with Clarence's help. The fact that this new, famous, supposedly invincible supercop who has been cramping their operations and who they now have orders to go and destroy is also a guy they already killed is probably one of those details he would mention.
Also, in an off screen conversation after Jones tells Bodicker OCP practically is the military, I would imagine Clarence might ask, "so, is there anything else we need to know?" to which Jones may well (if he knows this fact) reply "Oh yeah! You already killed him a few months ago! He might be a tad annoyed about it."
That's the reading of it I take, and I take Clarence's "taking this kinda personal" line as very pointed.
I'm a freelance illustrator.
Check me out here: www.curtisallen.co.uk
He didn't know.
The structure of the film displays that Emil is the second person to confirm to Robocop after his nightmares that he was human once. The first being Lois, who says "Murphy, it's you."
Robocop learns on his own that indeed he was once human and murdered, and finds out who did it.
Throughout the movie he is still just Robocop. Lois is the only one that shows him any humanity, and slowly he regains it with her help. When he takes off his helmet, she tells him, "it's good to see you again, Murphy."
When the final confrontation happens with Boddicker, he calls him Robocop. He didn't know. Murphy was faceless to Boddicker as he was to the world. He was just a machine. This stays true to the whole theme of the film.
By the end, when all is said and done, Robocop's character arc is complete. He accepts himself as human again.
"Nice shooting, son. What's your name?"
"Murphy."
It's so well done I get excited talking about it.
[deleted]
Clarence given all the cops he has killed and his Sociopath/Psychopath psyche he would have blanked out on anything about Murphy. Psychopaths can not understand peoples facial expressions the same way as a non Psychopaths. An angry face means little to them and a scared face and so on. they can recognize an individual on their facial traits; other people they have ties to.
Clarence after his car wreck at the Steel Mill he must have got a case of amnesia but he still walked away unscathed and unloaded on Lewis. He might have made the sick joke in reference to Murphy at Robocop. Could be out of coincidence or confusion.